You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#181 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Gibson Introduces New Slash Signature Rossa Corsa Les Paul guitar » 643 weeks ago
As a hack, I can't see spending big $$$ on a lp.
I'm with you there!
#182 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Gibson Introduces New Slash Signature Rossa Corsa Les Paul guitar » 643 weeks ago
I agree jonesy...here is my gibson les Paul
That's awesome Neemo. See, it just oozes class.
I have an Epiphone LP standard, couldn't afford a Gibson, but still, I totally love it. I get pissed off when I compare US and UK prices on musical instruments in general, I play guitar and drums, and looking at list prices US vs UK just gets me angry!
#183 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Myles replaces Bach in Kings of Chaos » 643 weeks ago
When I read this I didnt automatically assume it was because of Slash and Baz's loyalty to Axl, but now you guys mention it, it does seem suspect. But either way, I thought the idea of Baz, with Slash, Duff, Matt and Gilby was pretty cool, and I would love to see it!
#184 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl/Slash Picture on Paradise City » 643 weeks ago
Now they are posting whole shows iv the old band wierd
That kicks ass, totally. Loving it.
AXL: This is a little baby of mine.....called Estranged...
And then DTJ.....yeah!
#185 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Gibson Introduces New Slash Signature Rossa Corsa Les Paul guitar » 643 weeks ago
I just love Les Paul guitars, they are such a timeless design. Anyone studying design should take note, its so good, such a classic.
Just think, Les Paul, Jimmy Page, Randy Rhoads, Slash, Gary Moore, Bob Marley, the list goes on.
Here's something, Nigel Tufnel and Les Paul jamming, its so damn awesome. And Tufnel sports the kilt too, epic!
#186 Re: Guns N' Roses » Fandom and Negativity and the Internet » 648 weeks ago
Thanks for the link to "Making A Better Internet" Will. The phrase bottom half of the internet is a good one!
I'll read that tonight, when I am not on the internet :-/
#187 Re: Guns N' Roses » Fandom and Negativity and the Internet » 648 weeks ago
Hey Apex, I totally agree with you on the point about "If people would take up their personal lives in a more hands-on fashion, they'd notice 15 years on an album is not really their problem; it's the problem of those directly involved, who already get all the bitching in the world behind the scenes".
I recently stopped watching the news, and avoided it as much as possible. I've been studying for some exams I'm taking, so am trying to block out stuff and focus on my studies, outside of work, when the kid has gone to bed. Not much time so I binned eating dinner in front of the news, watching the news before bed. Started listening to podcasts about my study subject rather than the news in the car on the way to work and on the way home etc etc. And I feel so much better for it, not worrying about the shit that going on out there, and thinking more about my goals, and my family, its pretty good.
I find when I am vegging at home, I tend to aimlessly surf forums, blabbermouth and news sites, get nothing done, and in that head-space, its easy to bitch about anything online, especially an aging rock star who's let it go. But in those moments I try and remind myself that perhaps I need to let it go. Who cares? Really?
#188 Re: Guns N' Roses » Fandom and Negativity and the Internet » 648 weeks ago
Great topic.
Take when you go for a meal as an example, when you dislike the restaurant, you're more likely to mention that it was rubbish to a higher number of people, than if you had a good experience. 'Oh dont go to such and such a place, it was awful, the waiter was a jerk, the food was rubbish and expensive'. It's almost as if you feel hard done by, by the experience, so rant about it.
I have thought about this alot over the past couple of years, with GnR and other bands in mind. The internet gives us unprecedented access to the guys in bands we love. We see almost too much. Before, back in the day, you'd read a bit about them in a magazine, see some very small interviews on MTV or whatever, and that was it. There was a detachment which made them seem cooler that they actually probably were as people, a bit of mystery thrown in too. The music did the talking, and was always first.
Now, with alot of these guys you get every thought blurted on twitter, multiple interviews a week, youtube footage of them being a dick etc etc.
Take Sebastian Bach for instance, back in the day he was the cool looking dude in the photo's, sounded great on the records, was awesome live and that was it. Now, if you follow blabbermouth you'll see an interview a day, and you realise he is a bit of a dick. The mystery has gone, that guy you thought was cool, actually, would probably really get on your nerves if you spent an evening with him.
Dave Mustaine, jesus, shut up already.
So, yes internet makes it easier to be negative, but its because we are exposed to more of what these guys are really like. And we will pick up on what we see as lies/falsehoods etc, and its very easy to make our distaste public now. Also perhaps a sense of annoyance that the guys I looked up to when I was a teenager, are a bunch of idiots in the main. (but thats my age, cynicism, and naivety of youth from a time when I did think these guys were awesome cool).
And on the Blabbermouth subject, I go there alot but dont post and in most cases the negativity is rightfully thrown at guys like Geoff Tate, Dave Mustaine, Kerry King, and some of it often appeals to my childish sense of humour.
On the other hand, bands and artists that appear to have integrity do get full praise on that site, look at the posts to the Carcass and Xentrix stories the past couple of days, not a negative post on there yet, nothing but praise, so far. The same goes for posts relating to Iommi, DIO, in the main Zeppelin.
I think integrity has a lot to do with it. Once any internet community sees a lack of integrity, for whatever reason, from people held up high within that community, its pounced upon. And perhaps rightly so.
#189 Re: Guns N' Roses » To Fans » 650 weeks ago
Then again...Who knows...maybe he's sick of the other forums where people are still posting about the band and is seeking interaction with the 4-6 people who have actually posted here in the past 3 or 4 days.
It has been quiet lately.
#190 Re: Guns N' Roses » To Fans » 650 weeks ago
I was just glad that I had a reason to pull that awesome BS smiley. It made my morning.
Just in case it is him though, I sent an email, but since he's busy he may not read it.
I wonder what " these things" are he's tired of reading online?