You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1 Re: Guns N' Roses » Hard Skool: Does it date from ‘96? » 12 hours ago

All I know is that the Hammerstein shows rocked…

#2 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns n Roses=a joke » 33 hours ago

I’m with Dave, not sure what I want to hear at this point. Both tracks are leftovers. Record your own stuff or just let us hear the real deal from the other band

#3 Re: Guns N' Roses » Hard Skool: Does it date from ‘96? » 2 days ago

Honestly, do you really care who wrote it at this point? The only real proof you have is that it came out of the Chinese Democracy sessions….end of discussion…anything else is our societies newfound concern with “conspiracy” theories and believing idiotic random message board trolls or any former band members who may not remember what was originally played or thought about.

Silliness over 2 songs that weren’t good enough for Chinese after 10 years of work on the album!

#4 Re: Guns N' Roses » Which was worse: 1995-1999 or 2002-2006? » 4 days ago

Ditto…from Rio 2001 to 2002, we had songs and strong talk from Axl and Team Brazil about an album.

2002 to 2006 was just painful…

#5 Re: Guns N' Roses » Will the next single be something we've heard already? » 7 days ago

If this, then that…again, everyone was at fault from the label to management to the engineers/producers, and ultimately Axl.

The only people not at fault were all the new Gnr musicians who gave everything they had to make a GNR worthy album. Those guys and the fans got fucked. With the Best Buy deal CEO Rose parachuted out of the mess….the other guys were not so fortunate.

#6 Re: Guns N' Roses » Will the next single be something we've heard already? » 9 days ago

Good news is that football in the US is starting soon and I don’t have to worry about what outtake or b-side the new old newer older version of Gnr will release next! You know it will be another underwhelming effort.

#7 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why no photo shoots after 1991? » 11 days ago

All good….yes, there is a purity to simplicity! lol

#8 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why no photo shoots after 1991? » 11 days ago

The problem is what is “dated”? Is I’m So Lonesome I Could Cry dated? The song carries the day for me and if we are going to talk about tracklisting, how does Think About You and Anything Goes fit on an album with 10 other perfect hard rock tracks. AFD only needed one power ballad and definitely didn’t need a Hollywood Rose cover.

#9 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why no photo shoots after 1991? » 11 days ago

Did you really want GNR to be the Sex Pistols? If that were the case, then you don’t get Coma, Locomotive, Civil War, Estranged, November Rain, Breakdown, etc….those epics and that “dated” sound made them the Led Zeppelin of our generation and not one and done SexPistols.

#10 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why no photo shoots after 1991? » 11 days ago

axl92 Oh please….1991 can easily be considered the last great year in rock and roll history! There will never be another year like that….never. Think about it!

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB