You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1181 Re: Guns N' Roses » Did you buy Chinese Democracy single on Itunes? » 869 weeks ago

madagas wrote:

they stopped playing it on radio all together because Slash isn't on the track....Universal pulled it and won't be releasing the album either until Slash records over the guitars....

come on, man.... we are waaaay too fucking close.
not. funny.

#1182 Re: Guns N' Roses » Bach says he is on Sorry.. Leak fake » 869 weeks ago

hmmm... the plot thickens...
i think he's just trying to throw us off

#1183 Re: The Sunset Strip » AC/DC "Black Ice" Album and Tour Discussion » 869 weeks ago

Johnson definitely sounds like he's going away from the monotone screech he's had for the last 25+ years...
his voice is actually dynamic, much like on Back in Black...
pretty refreshing...
a very solid acdc record.. actually, pretty impressive considering their age

#1184 Re: Guns N' Roses » Crazy Theory regarding CD and Reunion » 869 weeks ago

absolutely, axlin...
if izzy gave a fuck about money, he would have never left in 91...

#1185 Re: Guns N' Roses » Couple questions/comments about album » 869 weeks ago

Axlin08 wrote:

Oklahoma I believe was actually the working title of Riad N' The Bedouins.

see.. i heard that too and was shot down on another forum...
then again.. i was shot down when i said "song #2" was prostitute...
many times...

#1186 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Rolling Stone Review-Chinese Democracy » 869 weeks ago

great review.. i was half dreading the RS review... i thought there was a large chance they were gonna piss on the record....
what a relief...
thanks for posting, russ...

#1187 Re: Management » Freeze on New Accounts poll » 869 weeks ago

so, if it's a quality control thing, guys.. go for it

#1188 Re: Guns N' Roses » (OLD NEWS!)The Limewire Leaks Discussion » 869 weeks ago

axl also made no bones about the fact that he saw guns as a "constantly evolving thing"....
the rest of 'em were like.."what the fuck is this shit?"

nobody can argue this...
hell, even some of the illusion shit... and i'm not even gonna mention "my world"..
axl and axl alone had to talk them into doing stuff like NR, estranged, etc...
even coma was a hell of alot more straightforward till axl got his mitts on it.. had they put out AFD 2, there woulda been a HUGE backlash... in order to stay relevant past 1989, they HAD to evolve.. but axl tried to push them too fast and too far out of their musical comfort zone, and they bailed.. i agree that without every musician on those records, they NEVER would have been as great as they were... having said that.. it was AXL's vision that pushed the band to the level it had achieved by 1993...

#1189 Re: Guns N' Roses » Crazy Theory regarding CD and Reunion » 869 weeks ago

D-Machine wrote:

All of this is pure speculation of course, but I have always thought a reunion would happen.

1.Just the money factor. I don't care who you are, money makes the world go 'round and Axl hasn't made a whole hell of a lot of it since 1994 or so. I'd say he isn't as rich as people think once u think about lawsuits, living expenses, money he blew from the tour on planes, parties, late fees etc. I remember in Slash's book, he talking of all the money they lost on the parties and late fees and jets etc.

Also throw in the fact he probably paid a lot out of pocket for CD and the band members salaries.


Bring in the most famous manager for getting bands back together and u have yet another coincidence. I'm sure part of Axl sees the money Motley and Van Halen have pulled in, and that has to make him consider it.

I mean these days of seperate buses, dressing rooms, the only time he'd have to even see the old members would be on stage for 2 hours. Small price to pay for tens of millions of dollars.

If Tommy Lee and Vince Neil can mend fences and DLR and EVH can... Slash and Axl can.

Couple that with Scott Weiland and his comment about the reunion and how it would happen if they'd shut up about it. Contracts were ready to be signed??

Why would Scott make that shit up? VR broke up? Hmmmmmmmmm u think maybe that had something to do with it? Slash turning on his singer for taking up for him and insulting Axl.........

just very weird scenarios.

Also, why are the record label now releasing a record they didn't want to release 8 years ago? remember it was finished several times axl said but the label wasn't happy?

Maybe a condition for the label releasing CD is a reunion tour.

Axl can't keep a new lineup together, he'd have all the control and would be able to basically do a Gene Simmons/Paul Stanley and hire the members back as "employees" on salary.

I don't think there would be any backlash either as he'd probably help his image a ton by doing a reunion.


Next point is the very little promotion, no band posters, no band interviews etc.

I think u could very easily see a GNR lineup of:
Matt Sorum
Duff
Slash
Richard Fortus *Izzy probably wouldn't want to do a full tour
Dizzy
Chris Pitman

Fuck it, maybe even keep Matt out and keep Frank or Brain or whoever.

If CD is a massive success, maybe this won't happen, but if it isn't and there is a tour and it does as bad as previous US tours...

I think it will definitely happen.

makes more sense than any of us would like to believe...

#1190 Re: Guns N' Roses » Did you buy Chinese Democracy single on Itunes? » 869 weeks ago

just did it.. samnuts unwittingly sold me...
*legally buying new guns n' roses music*
ahhhh.. feels good...

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB