You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1691 Re: Guns N' Roses » 11/03/2012 - The Joint - Las Vegas, NV » 706 weeks ago
I am not a big fan of the album version of the song but I must say it was a beast live...
#1692 Re: Guns N' Roses » 12 GN'R shows in Las Vegas » 706 weeks ago
the one with the royal straight flush is cool and simple...I like that one. Buzz and Russ will be hoping for a few of those shortly!
#1693 Re: Guns N' Roses » 11/02/2012 - The Joint - Las Vegas, NV » 706 weeks ago
hopefully not
#1694 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose - USA Today interviews » 706 weeks ago
agree..he is all over the board. Again, they all are. It's a bad divorce and both sides have heavily bias agendas.
#1695 Re: Guns N' Roses » Burton Cummings Axl/RRHOF Reference » 706 weeks ago
you could say Slash ruined the name by leaving/quitting....double edged sword...no one is "right"...except Bono of course.
#1696 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose - USA Today interviews » 706 weeks ago
Div.....and this is what we should have got instead of the mess we ended up with...more songs like this with tasteful guitar...stripped down arrangements...easily the best Nov Rain ever....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Svb_wAMuFL8
#1697 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose - USA Today interviews » 706 weeks ago
I don't think so but can't speak for Monkey...
#1698 Re: Guns N' Roses » 10/31/2012 - The Joint - Las Vegas, NV » 706 weeks ago
the LALD screams were pretty f'n awesome.
#1699 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose - USA Today interviews » 706 weeks ago
Sky Dog wrote:Mikka, they are all full of shit. I don't know why it bothers you so much ..still....at this point. I am so over analyzing what they say or supposedly said. I honestly don't care and can't understand why others do after all these years.
You are right, that they are lying time to time, or giving shady interpratations. But. I'm sure that the online fanbase only made it worse, since even the lies got spinned.
Although I sometimes get very emotional about this nonsense, it's more of a hobby for me, to see it (past and present) as clear as I can.
I guess I never respected or cared what the online fanbase thought. Honestly, I think the majority of online Gnr fans are idiots. That is why I settled here. We are idiots just slightly less than the rest of the pack! 
#1700 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose - USA Today interviews » 706 weeks ago
This is what's wrong with GnR today:
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/31/showbiz/m … ?hpt=en_c1
Take a look at the 9 pictures. Sorum and Gilby are featured while nobody in the new band is (though if you look really carefully at one of the pics you might see one or two of them blurred in the background).
This band can never move forward until they can overcome this perception. Everyone thought it would change when CD was released, but it hasn't. I know, you die hards want to blame the media for this, but the media isn't doing anything that the general public doesn't think already anyway. It's great that the new guys are doing these interviews for local tv and getting their pictures taken by signs in Vegas, but nobody really cares. Nobody is seeing them outside of the forums.
I'm not suggesting they give up, but it might be time to change strategies. Whatever they are doing isn't working.
Axl's fault. He is a day late and a dollar short as far as promoting his new band....should have been doing that in 1998!
