You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1761 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose joins AC/DC » 551 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:
tejastech08 wrote:

Why the fuck did we have to see GN'R fall apart over creative differences when they could have just followed the AC/DC model and pumped out an Appetite clone 6-8 times over the last 20 years?

You'd want that?

I'd pass.

What we got wasn't perfect, but at least there were pieces of music in between that was worthy of a legacy and I'm factoring in UYI material with There Was A Time ect. Going through the motions like Metallica ect. and the other major artists that stayed around, just meh.

#1762 Re: Guns N' Roses » Lana Del Rey to support Guns??? » 551 weeks ago

Bunch of the shirts were made for different people.

https://twitter.com/gnrla/status/722118401343234048

Bad news for any Guns N' Roses fans hoping to see Lana Del Rey warm up crowds on their tour.
The moody indie singer is NOT opening for GNR despite a flurry of rumors after Lana posted a pic wearing a jacket that read "Lana Del Rey Guns N' Roses 2016 Tour."
We're told Axl Rose gifted the personalized satin tour jackets to his friends and family. Lana was one of a couple dozen who got the hookup. Sources close to the unexpected pals tell us they've been tight for years.
We're told Lana met Axl through a mutual friend -- her ex-boyfriend Justin Murdock, billionaire heir to the Dole Food Company.
Lana ditched Murdock in 2012, but she obviously got Axl in the breakup.

Source: http://www.tmz.com/2016/04/18/guns-n-ro … ening-act/

#1763 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the tour - Rules SG would have in place » 551 weeks ago

Obviously Smoking didn't watch the Paradise City video or is dodging the question. Slash is speeding up the track, before the drums even kick in.

#1764 Re: Guns N' Roses » Lana Del Rey to support Guns??? » 551 weeks ago

-edit-

Actually I feel bad about linking to stalker sites tongue.

#1765 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the tour - Rules SG would have in place » 551 weeks ago

Is this the faster tempo? It doesn't sound like Frank's the one pushing them to play faster.

#1766 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the tour - Rules SG would have in place » 551 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:

Brain would've been great but people would complain on that choice as well.

If Adler was there, it'd be about Richard's tone.

I don't see why people could possibly believe that Frank on his own has enough sway in the band to dictate the way the rest of the band plays. It's a conscious decision, if there's really anything to it at all.

#1767 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the tour - Rules SG would have in place » 551 weeks ago

I know people don't like some of the comments he's made down the years, but he's the tour manager. He works for Axl, not like there's no reason for him to be there.

#1768 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the tour - Rules SG would have in place » 551 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:

No hanger ons back stage

No booze or drugs EVER around Slash or Duff (respect their battle)

I'm all for these two but the first one will never happen.

The other stuff will naturally work itself out.

I seen a very vague description of what people described as hangers on the other forum that seemed to include band members girlfriends, Lana Del Rey and a nightclub owner who hosted a few gigs on the previous tours.

I'm not saying they don't exist, I'm just what people's definition is here. I'm also referring to 2016.

CSS 2.0 wrote:

I disagree with that one as well. Each to their own.

Yep.

#1769 Re: The Garden » GTA V Online - GnREvo » 551 weeks ago

I think I'm going to dive into this again with the PS4 version (previously played through it on the PS3 a few years back).

Obviously I will not be playing it online, but would I have needed a PS Plus subscription anyway?

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB