You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1841 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Guns N Roses member Melissa Reese » 551 weeks ago

monkeychow wrote:

man I feel dirty just typing that....;)

Mikka probably would have got excited though reading that 18.

#1842 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Guns N Roses member Melissa Reese » 551 weeks ago

Didn't he also say he'd consider a female singer for VR at one point too?

#1843 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2016 Summer Stadium 'Not In This Lifetime' Tour » 551 weeks ago

elevendayempire wrote:
AtariLegend wrote:
elevendayempire wrote:

GN'R could be coming to the UK this year. Praise be!

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/report … xJCVPtj.16

I don't see how them filling out 3 dates at Wembley is realistic. It could be a bit dangerous to try and put 270,000 tickets on sale tongue.

If Robbie Williams can sell out Knebworth three days on the trot to 375,000 people, I'm pretty sure a reunited GN'R playing their first gigs in the UK (possibly in Europe) could manage 270,000.

Different demographics.

#1844 Re: Guns N' Roses » SG's and other EVO member's Videos from the Vegas Shows » 551 weeks ago

Someone posted a good audio recording of the first show on the other forum. Slash is definitely playing the riff of Riad clear as day multiple times before the band starts the jam/Rocket Queen.

There's members of audience that pick up on it right away as well.

#1845 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2016 Summer Stadium 'Not In This Lifetime' Tour » 551 weeks ago

elevendayempire wrote:

GN'R could be coming to the UK this year. Praise be!

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/report … xJCVPtj.16

I don't see how them filling out 3 dates at Wembley is realistic. It could be a bit dangerous to try and put 270,000 tickets on sale tongue.

#1846 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 551 weeks ago

That one time Ted Cruz filed a 76-page brief to ban sex toys and ‘autonomous sex’

Further proof Ted Cruz is the ultimate buzz kill: That one time he tried to ban sex toys.

The GOP presidential second-runner once pored over an impassioned plea to cease sex toys in Texas — and his 76-page screed against self-pleasure resurfaced Wednesday thanks to an expose from Mother Jones.

As Texas’ solicitor general in 2007, Cruz filed a brief in the US Court of Appeals upholding a lower court’s decision to criminalize the sale of dildos and other sex toys — or “obscene devices,” as Cruz called them on paper.

The case arose from retailers selling sex toys challenging a state law outlining the promotion of their products. The sex shop vendors argued the law violated the 14th Amendment’s right to privacy — by policing the privacy of the bedroom.

As part of his master debate against sex toys, Cruz and his legal staff argued dildos are not “deeply rooted in the Nation’s history and traditions,” and that selling them violates “public morals.”

Elsewhere in the whopping brief, Cruz argued sex toys show “no liberty interest relating to procreation,” and he defended the government’s right to discourage “autonomous sex.”

“There is no substantive-due-process right to stimulate one's genitals for non-medical purposes unrelated to procreation or outside of an interpersonal relationship,” Cruz wrote.

The appellate court wasn't’ feeling Cruz’s bad vibrations — and ruled against him in a 2-1 vote.

But Cruz carried on with his heroic quest to rub out sex toys, teaming with Texas attorney general Greg Abbott to file another brief requesting a hearing. The duo even asked to take the case to the Supreme Court before they finally pulled out for good.

Cruz would later became a Texas senator, while Abbott serves as the Lone Star’s governor.

Cruz’s war on dildos hasn’t come up during his presidential run, but he hasn’t grown any more sex positive, as he regularly speaks out against abortion, Planned Parenthood and birth control access.

But one person from his past questioned Cruz’s battle against “autonomous sex” — Craig Mazin, the college roommate infamous for spilling embarrassing details on Cruz.

Mazin tweeted Wednesday: “Ted Cruz thinks people don’t have a right to ‘stimulate their genitals.’ I was his college roommate. This would be a new belief of his.”

Source: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politic … -1.2600419

#1847 Re: Guns N' Roses » MATT SORUM 'Wasn't Asked' To Take Part In GUNS N' ROSES Reunion » 551 weeks ago

His was first. He sued her for punching him in the groin at a Christmas party, metal abuse, 100K in jewelry that she didn't return then she counter sued with Erin involved. Erin launched her own case. It all ended up dropped and settled out of court.

#1848 Re: Guns N' Roses » MATT SORUM 'Wasn't Asked' To Take Part In GUNS N' ROSES Reunion » 551 weeks ago

monkeychow wrote:

Stephanie and Erin said Axl abused them

...But Stephanie only made the allegations after Erin got involved with her case and it turned into a counter-sue? Again I'm not saying he's innocent, but there's a bit more to the general narrative. He wasn't found guilty in court.

monkeychow wrote:

suggests Axl has an occasional rage problem

Which is why it's so easy to believe and why people don't think Adler's a bad person (despite the fact he actually sentenced to jail for beating up multiple women).

As for Matt personally, I have nothing against him as a fan. The only thing Frank had over him was that Frank was already in the band and Matt would have demanded a bigger cut for himself; despite probably being irrelevant to ticket tickets. Just my opinion.

#1849 Re: The Garden » Back » 551 weeks ago

Hello welcome back jessica!

#1850 Re: Guns N' Roses » MATT SORUM 'Wasn't Asked' To Take Part In GUNS N' ROSES Reunion » 552 weeks ago

CSS 2.0 wrote:

All I know is that the trial was during the time of the Oklahoma City bombing in April, 1995 and that it was eventually settled out of court.

That spawned the track that went on to become "Berlin", that we'll probably never hear.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB