You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#181 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 104 weeks ago

FlashFlood wrote:

If I’m Axl, I’d want the original The General out there before the Slash/Duff version. Have your cake and eat it.

Damned right. I want the original, too.

As Detective Columbo, my mom’s favorite TV character, used to say, just one more thing:

“It is widely assumed that I’m likely to have access to more leaks. I don’t. I’m not a hoarder, and I don’t care to have anything I can’t share. I know that there are about ten more Guns N’ Roses songs floating around among outsiders, but I forget the working titles that I had been given, and I forget the name of one guy I met that had them. I’m not just saying that; I really do forget these details. I didn’t care, because they did me no good. What I’ve heard left me somewhat impressed, as I recall, but I’ve heard no new songs more than once, and none all the way through. I can barely remember how they went. I do not have a photographic memory.”

The second disc of Chinese Democracy is circulating.

How do we hear it? What will it take?

These are direct questions to those who have already sat on the tracks for a decade.

#182 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 104 weeks ago

To better remember what happened 15 years ago around now I went looking for Skwerl’s article about the 2008 leaks on Antiquiet and it seems that site is gone? Eventually it turned up here:

https://steveleeds.wordpress.com/tag/guns-n-roses/

This part is interesting:

“The story I got from Steve was that a year prior, a friend of his, a courier of some kind, walked into Jimmy Iovine’s office, and walked out with a CD. Ten tracks; these nine, plus another version of Better that I never bothered to get from Steve.”

Oh, and this:

“Jarmo from the GNR fansite Here Today… Gone To Hell came across news of the leak. He immediately notified Fernando Santos, who checked it out, and then did a Whois lookup on Antiquiet.com to get my phone number so he could talk tough to me.”

And this, which suggests that THE BAND TAKES ACTION ONLY WHEN LEAKS OCCUR:

“Chinese Democracy was finally released on November 23rd, 2008, exclusively at Best Buy, about 20 weeks after my leaks. That’s from no concrete plans, to going up on shelves. Pretty quickly, especially if we’re talking about the poster child for album delays. What did we know about that deal? Best Buy paid a large up front sum for the exclusive, at least seven figures, by all reports. We obtained evidence showing that the value of that exclusive was determined largely by the media hype my leaks had created. UMG had shown Best Buy charts of Google traffic for Chinese Democracy that started spiking in June, and was riding high. The iron was hot, so to speak. And before Best Buy got on board, the only heat source was the fire under my ass.

We started noticing a peculiar trend. Maybe it was all coincidence, maybe none of it was, or maybe something in between. But every time there was a major development in my case, there was a promotional event that seemed to capitalize on it. I would attend a scheduled court appearance, and a single would drop. Or the album art would be revealed. Or there was a tour announcement. I forget what lined up with what; at the time, I wasn’t sure if it was calculated, or our imaginations getting out of hand. So I wasn’t paying very close attention to that thread, but it was one that David and our PI would point out regularly.

What I do believe is that UMG used my leak to their advantage.”

Consider what happened with the storage locker leaks preceding the “Absurd”/“HS” single.

Which suggests that if we do want to hear “The General” …

A leak may indeed be what takes to get an official release.

#183 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 104 weeks ago

Scabbie wrote:

To remove an article from a German magazine where the bassist of the band sugggests there maybe news this week shows how paranoid band management must be. pathetic

I wonder how this will go over with Duff if he hears about it. I also honestly wonder what he and Slash decide to do after this year’s shows. Seattle was added to the end of the tour and it’s Duff’s home town.

Is he privately wanting out of the band, but also wanting one last show in the town where he started, and which was the location of one of their very first shows?

#184 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 104 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:

The lack of music sucks, but he wouldn't be Axl if he wasn't a madman. All great artists are somewhat mad in my opinion.

He'll go down in history with about 70 songs to his name. Not very prolific, but on the other hand most of them are very good songs. The only band I can think of with as many hits in a slim discography has to be the Beatles.

I give The Beatles a ton of credit. They did two successful feature films and wrote hundreds of songs known around the world from 1962 — 1970. Pretty much the span of time from Live Like a Suicide to The Spaghetti Incident. Not to mention a tons of interviews, music videos, John’s books, writing hits for others (including The Stones), their involvement with the “Yellow Submarine” film, solo projects …

They ultimately made greater use of the time they had. And produced probably three times as many songs.

Now that the Duff interview has been removed from the Internet my hope for new music is dropping rapidly. Did not expect this (apparent) rug pull.

#185 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 104 weeks ago

James wrote:

A Stones comparison to Axl/GNR...

Imagine the Stones breaking up after Undercover...which they basically did....but then absolutely nothing for years. Jagger releases Wandering Spirit, and then years later the Stones reunite for a nostalgia tour and release Doom and Gloom as a single.

Look at everything fans would've missed out on.

Christ. That puts a lot in perspective.

#186 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 104 weeks ago

elevendayempire wrote:

Also a bunch of those albums are the (Taylor's Version) ones, aren't they? Which are just re-recordings of old material.

Three are re-recordings, but what about the re-recorded Appetite? Why didn’t we ever get that?

Or any of the many UYI demos and outtakes that we know of from bootlegs that were not released on the box sets?

Swift is releasing new music like crazy. Plus she releases remixes on streaming services (I looked them up). Where are the GnR Brain remixes?

Swift is a prolific artist in a way I wish Axl would be. She seems to love sharing her music, and won’t let anything stop her. Yes, Axl went through hell trying to release ChiDem but Swift had her own record company hassles which is why she is re-recording her early albums. She hasn’t had an easy time. She is just (apparently) more resourceful and persistent than he is.

He is one of the best artists of his generation. He has amazing human insights to share in his work. He should be as relevant in 2023 as Taylor Swift is but looking only to the past and not releasing new stuff gets in the way.

#187 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 104 weeks ago

The irony.

You know who IS selling out stadiums? And just released her SIXTH album since 2019?

Taylor f’ing Swift. She wipes the floor with Axl in terms of bullheaded determination and generosity when it comes to sharing her talent as a songwriter.

Totally different style, of course. But for her to just drop 22 new studio recordings in the middle of the best-selling concert tour of all time (which is to say she didn’t NEED any extra publicity) … while we are crossing our fingers for two songs?

Ridiculous. Again, I agree with James. GnR need to pony up some music because in 2023 they are losing fans and relevancy.

#188 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 104 weeks ago

Axl S wrote:

I just wish the band would release something unleaked. They complain that their shit keeps getting leaked before release - they're the ones who control whether this stuff comes out or not. Each day they let pass without releasing the unleaked material is a day closer to it eventually leaking one day.

I don't feel cheated though about them releasing things I've heard officially though. That's stupid.

This is so true. The only reason the band even has fans and glimmers of media interest anymore is that every few years we get a leak that excites us and the press.

Otherwise what is there to talk about!

The leakers have done the band’s test marketing. If a particular release does not do as well as expected, a follow-up might surpass expectations. The Beatles didn’t stop working when “Magical Mystery Tour” flopped compared to the previous movies. They kept releasing new music.

GnR apparently has at least an entire album with Axl vocals on it. Allow Duff and Slash to contribute songs and they can easily get two albums ready to go.

Just release something already.

#189 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 105 weeks ago

monkeychow wrote:
Shacklermyrye wrote:

Axl didn’t sing the “ahhh” scream in “Absurd.” He just pointed in the air when the recording played.

I've noticed he often gestures at Melissa or otherwise to the screen etc when the scream is triggered.

My take now is that he's actually purposely drawing attention to the fact its a sample so as to avoid any suggestion that he was attempting to mime to a backing track.

Like not only is he not miming to it but he makes it so no one could be confused that its a sample.

Like being honest upfront that that part of the vocal is not live.

That is a really good point. Look at what KISS and Motley Crue and even WASP are apparently doing nowadays …

#190 Re: Guns N' Roses » If GNR releases nothing in 2023, is this the end for you? » 105 weeks ago

There is a lot of warmth to his stage interactions. He also went up to Slash to rest a hand on his shoulder which was great to see. Shows how their friendship has rebounded.

What was weird was his choice not to sing the scream. At the House of Blues performance he visibly loved the vocal gymnastics. Now he is … relying on tapes?

He should run around less to preserve his lung capacity. Same trap Mick Jagger got onto around 1981. Everyone saw him sprinting across the stage in that concert that aired on cable TV (on HBO, I think?) and expected it of him, whereas in the ‘60s and ‘70s he tended to stand at the microphone.

Still curious to see if they spring a new song on us.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB