You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#201 Re: Guns N' Roses » Secret show: April 1, L.A.? » 493 weeks ago
I support ya even if I don't agree. You are certainly entitled to feel the way you do tho.
I think seeing some youtube videos in a couple days is going to soften that blow. I'm just happy the shows are happening.
#202 Re: Guns N' Roses » Secret show: April 1, L.A.? » 493 weeks ago
And just think.. in about 30 hours, there could possibly be video clips of Axl, Slash, and Duff all on the same stage playing the songs we love, streaming on YouTube.
#203 Re: Guns N' Roses » Secret show: April 1, L.A.? » 493 weeks ago
James Lofton wrote:monkeychow wrote:Sounds like GNR, market a show as the first time Axl and Slash have been together on stage in two decades, your fans pay thousands to go rather than wait for the inevitable global tour so as to feel the excitement of the first time , many traveling from overseas for thousands of bucks, and then you play a secret show before hand.
I love the music but this band literally has no respect for it's fanbase at all.
I disagree. Holding secret shows isn't disrespectful. It's basically a rehearsal and helps create extra buzz.
GNR has a loooooooooong track record of doing shows before any tour starts. No one should be surprised about any potential shows beforehand. Its par for the course.
I didn't consider Soundgarden's secret show disrespectful and I wont consider GNR's to be either.
People paid THOUSANDS....
Rock N Rio wasn't a reunion. This is 23 fucking years and the first time they were supposed to be together is April 8. You can't spin it any other way. It is bullshit. They don't need to rehearse for a crowd. They are all over 50, not 15. Show up like a badass and own it in Vegas. Vegas sold out fast as fuck cause it was to be the first show. PERIOD.
Its supply and demand. People are willing to pay those thousands. Vegas sold out because no one knew if there would be more shows or not.. maybe a once in a lifetime opportunity.
#204 Re: Guns N' Roses » Looks like rehearsals have started! » 494 weeks ago
For a 54 year old Axl Rose, he looks like one would expect.
#205 Re: Guns N' Roses » AXL In ACDC??? » 494 weeks ago
Jim Breuer should be the full in. Axl can do Bon songs but can't do full on Brian Johnson I don't believe.
He can do full on Axl. No reason he has to try to be anyone other than himself. Regardless of the band he is fronting.
#206 Re: Guns N' Roses » AXL In ACDC??? » 494 weeks ago
I'm not a hardcore AC/DC fan by any stretch, but I enjoy some of the music and respect the band.
This would be a great gig for Axl.
Love it or hate it, its going to be interesting to see. Looking forward to it.
#207 Re: Guns N' Roses » US Tour Cities » 494 weeks ago
So they are finally going back to St. Louis!
My mom lives in St. Louis. hmmmm.
#208 Re: Guns N' Roses » Vegas Shows Roll Call » 495 weeks ago
I'm looking for two nosebleeds on Apr 9.. I'm a Vegas local..
#209 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 495 weeks ago
Haha, what a throwback to the Hammerstein shows. Those were some epic shows and I'm glad I was able to go.
Tis true.. it was much the same.. no press, didn't even reveal who was in the band until the first night. So this is nothing new.
#210 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 496 weeks ago
Sorum, I respect his time in the band, but I think its better to move on without him.