Bro-mero wrote:

Obviously the better team doesn't always win, but lets face it, the Packers are better. Your Bears bias is clouding up your unbiased judgement. The general population would agree with me that the Packers are a better team than the Bears.  We'll see who has the better record at the end of the year. And when the Packers have a better record than the Bears at the end of the regular season, don't go bitching to the forum and try to justify your precious Bears and their inferior season to the Pack.

End of story

Do they play the same teams the same weeks?  Record doesn't mean jack shit as long as it's close and there are certainly reasons teams lose that have nothing to do with talent.  The Pack could go 15-1 and I'd still tell you the Bears have more talent, and I'd still be right.  As you point out, GB was 10-0 and the Bears were 7-3, yet most in the industry were talking about the Bears playing as good as anybody at that point.  That's what you don't get.  Sure, some of that was probably just something to talk about, but things change.  It's not about records.  Ask GB if the NYG's record affected their game with them last year.  Ask SF the same question.

I think the issue is Cutler doesn't think he can beat the Pack.  That has nothing to do with talent. And I'm not going to waste my time explaining why because it was SOOOOOOOO freaking obvious that they were bet

You have so much to learn about sports that you probably shouldn't even be discussing it at this point.