You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#241 Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Duff SW blog Oct 21st. » 777 weeks ago

mickronson
Replies: 12

http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/reverb/2 … oct_21.php

The McKagan Family Business Is Booming, Despite Its Doubters

I have been away to London on business all of this past week. From what I understand, maybe that wasn't such a bad thing.

Chris Kornelis posted a story here last Thursday about the fact that my sweet wife is a part of a new reality show on the E! network. I received some e-mails from friends on my Blackberry pertaining to some of the dark and mean-spirited comments that followed Chris' piece in the comments section. I also heard from Chris that a lot of you stood up for Susan and our family. Thank you. The comments were bad enough, though, that the Weekly was forced to take down the comments board.

Let me tell you a little story: Back in 2002, I was living happily in Seattle with Susan and our two babies. I was an ardent student at Seattle University, and our lives were pretty much nerd-filled and stress-free.

I had pulled back from a scary life of excess that had almost killed me, and with the help of my girls (Susan IS one of my girls), I was settling down to a life I thought I could never attain: peace and academia and good friends that I grew up with.

But almost suddenly and out of nowhere, the lure of a great rock band in Los Angeles reared its presence to me. It was a chance to play with Slash and Matt Sorum again, and there was a lot of excitement around what this thing could be. I HAD to try it. I don't ever in this life want to wonder "what if?"

But Susan got worried, and rightfully so. Would old demons haunt me in a city that had more than a pound of my flesh? Would I act on them? And what about the kids? It's a big thing to uproot a family and just go.

Susan had my back, though. She knew that she could not be the one to hold me back if my musical passion called. Our lives changed from the tranquil lakeside setting in Seattle to a constant adapt-to-chaos situation in Los Angeles. Susan kept our household stress-free and steady for our daughters and me the whole time--as things were really starting to get crazy all around us.

When I relapsed on pills after 11 years of sobriety, Susan was the one there for me. She nursed me through my sickness and withdrawal and sought education on addiction, as opposed to being pisse -off and judgmental. She had never known me when I was drinking and using back in the day.

With the rise of Velvet Revolver, Susan began to be approached by a few different TV producers with varying ideas. She was, after all, a top model, and now a top mom and swimwear designer. They thought that there was perhaps a compelling TV story or series in there.

This gave Susan the idea to write and create a scripted show. The things that she had experienced out there with the other wives in VR were just too good and almost juicy . . . and FUNNY. She had caught the TV bug and now wanted to create a show. She had created herself as a model. She had created her own swim line. She had created herself as a kickass mother. Why couldn't she create this show?

Ah, but scripted shows are not the big and easy money-makers for the networks. Reality shows are. The production costs are minimal in comparison to their scripted counterparts. Susan's show idea went from basically a screenplay to a reality show with HER as one of its "stars." Trust me, she doesn't see herself as a "star," and thinks the whole thing is hilarious!

But then there is me. I do not like reality shows. No, I actually despise what little I have seen and think that some of this stuff has really poisoned our perception of reality. But then again, I have a ton of male rock friends who watch this stuff and fucking LOVE it. I don't believe that there is a real place for "rock guys" on an E! show, and Dave Navarro will be the first to tell you that if he could have done it differently, he would have never done the "Carmen and Dave" show. He has had to claw his way back into legit musical circles, as he sees it. (I think Dave is just so good at what he does musically that NOTHING could ever do THAT much damage to him).

So then that day came--the day Susan asked if I would be on her new show "just for one episode, baby. PLEASE! I know that you don't like this stuff, but they want me to ride a motorcycle and I thought we could do it together?" The show IS called "Married to Rock," right?

Since we had both immediately decided that our daughters would NOT be a part of the show (that would go against our ethos of privacy for them and for any "celebrity" that they might come upon, which would be of their choosing AFTER THEY ARE AT LEAST 18! Grace of course was BUMMED--but I digress).

How could I say no to my wife? How DARE I? This woman who has backed ME and taken care of ME and believed in ME? No, baby, whatever you need from me, I will do (of course, within reason).

We both decided that showing me with any band I was in would be fucking tacky and seen as gross commercialism. I suppose Loaded could USE a little gross commercialism, but not of this sort.

People may love this show or hate this show, and likewise Susan's participation in it. I'm in it for a few seconds too, but blink and you will miss me. I am not in this life to judge or react too hard to what people say to me either on fan forums or here at the Weekly.

First and foremost, I am in the McKagan family business, and doing right to those whom have done right by me and stayed with me through it all. And business is booming.

--

yeah, his wife is gonna be on tv in a reality thing called Married to Rock, btw.

#242 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Loaded update (new song on espn) » 777 weeks ago

according to friend of a friend, it was played.. not just the once I hope neutral

#243 Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Loaded update (new song on espn) » 778 weeks ago

mickronson
Replies: 9

"Allright! Let the games begin..As of tonight, ESPN and Major League Baseball are using a new LOADED song called "WE WIN" off of our upcoming record for their coverage of the ALCS,NLCS and World Series game coverage....This is just the beginning, stayed tuned for info on upcoming stuff...Hold on to your hats...There is a storm a brewin!"

so new album very soon and tour...  bets on Axl turning up to 1 of the shows?? 9

#245 Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Duffs latest blog. More Musings.....Responsibility? » 778 weeks ago

mickronson
Replies: 8

RESPONSIBILTY?
By Duff McKagan

About 19 years ago, I wrote a song with and for Guns N Roses, called ‘Get In The Ring’. At that point in our career, we had ceased to be the darlings of critics.  When our band started to ‘blow up’, it became apparent that there was an almost sudden sea-change in how our live shows and records were getting critiqued in the press. No big deal really; you just realize that this kind of stuff comes with the territory.

But what interested me then was: Why would a critic come to our show when it was often openly obvious that he or she didn’t like us in the first place? Why waste the time? Why spread a vitriolic point of view? Hence, the first line in that song-

‘Why do you look at me when you hate me?’

Flash forward to now: I write for a paper that has music critics. With my history, it interests me as to who our music critics are-in a purely educational way. I can’t lie; I actually do keep tabs and have barked loudly internally here at The Weekly when I feel vitriol and prejudice played a part in any review that I might happen upon. I’m sure that my ‘friends’ here at the paper have dwindled by a writer or two.

A year or so ago, I touched upon the subject of how online news and entertainment sites are sort of just plain taking over.  Print newspapers and magazines are dying off. For good or for bad, this is just the way it is. Information-Age economics have dictated a change in MANY areas (music downloads, online movie rentals, and etc).

In writing for The Seattle Weekly, I have benefited first-hand from this change. I have been given the chance to learn how to write to a certain degree-with some good tutelage and encouragement even. But still, I am certainly not a bona-fide journalist, or anything close to it. I’m just a guy who writes stuff.

I am a serious reader too. I believe that when given a responsibility like a weekly column, one should rise to the occasion. Seattle is a very literate city, and I feel honored to be writing for one of its respected periodicals. I have high expectations from others here too.

To do less than one’s best is just sloppy, in my view at least.

Although I certainly understand the importance of drawing readers to certain sites by having a juicy scoop or a story with conflict-the more ‘hits’ a site gets, the higher the advertisement revenue- I just don’t get why certain writers think they can either dictate from an Ivory Tower of judgment or just slander recklessly.

You have read these writers, and so have I.

For me, a site like The Seattle Weekly’s or, say, The Village Voice’s, should be a place to sort of come in from the storm. You all should be able to trust us writers at these quasi-esteemed papers. That is my view at least. The writers must earn the trust of the public though. When a writer pens a piece that is outwardly obviously intended to be prejudicial (good or bad), or badly researched, the whole lot of writers for that paper are somewhat soiled. Again, this is just my opinion.

Am I alone in this view?

I’ve got an editor here at The Weekly, Chris Kornelis. He is a smart dude and has at times ‘held me to task’ or otherwise questioned the intent of this piece or that. He has made me think and helped me to be better. He has his boss, and it goes up from there. Who holds THOSE guys to task? Those ‘editors of editors’? I trust that their experience and drive for excellence does.

I write for The Seattle Weekly because I love to do it. It is a sizeable challenge and it gives me a chance to interact on topics that I am curious or otherwise interested in. There are countless blogs and whatnot out there that have a whole lot less to offer than we have here. You can get biased or sloppily written ‘takes’ and articles on music at countless sites, I am sure. There are plenty of right or left-leaning political sites too, if you like steeper ‘slants’. Online newspapers like this one ARE the new paradigm for the straight-ish dope though, and as such, are the new gate-keepers of truth and insight. Or they should be, from where I sit.

If I don’t like, say, Mel Gibson…I will be responsible enough to pull myself out of the running if approached to write an article on his new movie (IF he had and new movie, and IF I didn’t like Mel Gibson). It would be biased and not very righteous of me to knowingly sit in the wings for such an easy attack-IF this was the case.

Neither should it be all peaches and cream, though. I like reading people’s thoughts and insights, especially when they are intellectual and researched and whatever else.

Being a writer now for online papers these days I think, brings with it, a new burden of self-restraint. There are enough crappy things going on around us in this world and a tainted and spiteful article about someone’s art just adds noxious noise.

#246 Re: Guns N' Roses » Duff Joining GNR (Oct 14, 2010) was awesome but dumb » 778 weeks ago

You are right.. Axl planned it all along, he stole a delorean and handed his 17 yo self a copy of AFD..

#247 Re: Guns N' Roses » Duff Joining GNR (Oct 14, 2010) was awesome but dumb » 778 weeks ago

Are you drunk? lol..  I'm still amazed it happend, out of the blue.  Though, I was half expecting ISE to be one of the songs, its just one of those 'Duff' songs, the bass intro and all that

#248 Re: Guns N' Roses » London, England – October 14th, 2010 (O2 Arena) » 778 weeks ago

DJ and Fortus maybe, but to recreate Slash, sorry you are quite ill, you need help.  He`s good, but I wouldn't call him the human dictaphone...

#249 Re: Guns N' Roses » Duff Joining GNR (Oct 14, 2010) was awesome but dumb » 778 weeks ago

Duff has a new album coming out..guest spot Axl wink wink.....I can dream

#250 Guns N' Roses » GNR fined $108,000 for breaking curfew. » 778 weeks ago

mickronson
Replies: 16

http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/st … ew_1173434

Guns 'N Roses Face $108,000 Fine For Breaking Gig Curfew

DUFF MCKAGAN's GUNS N' ROSES return in London on Thursday (14Oct10) has been marred after the band was handed a huge fine for running over its allocated time-slot.

The bassist, who recently quit Jane's Addiction, thrilled fans at the British capital's O2 Arena when he reunited with his ex-bandmate Axl Rose to play a string of the group's greatest hits.

But the rockers are now facing an estimated $108,000 (£72,000) fine from the venue's officials for playing past the 11pm curfew, according to Britain's The Sun newspaper.

An O2 Arena spokesperson confirms the band's promoters will incur a fine for the late finishes, which totalled three hours over two gigs.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB