You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#271 Re: Guns N' Roses » GN'R Twitter Updates » 845 weeks ago
Anybody else laugh as hard as I did when I read Axl using the words "cash grab"?
#272 Re: The Garden » The World is truly Fucked » 845 weeks ago
That's not even the best sex scene. There was one from the 1st season where they got garbage dumped on them and just kept-on-a-fuckin.
#273 Re: The Garden » The Wrestling thread » 845 weeks ago
Yeah, I'm pretty sure I read once that in his heyday Austin was pulling in 7 figures a year... and with the amount of merch he moved he deserved it.
Perscription or not, it wasn't responsibly, because I know the bit about the straw for sure, I'm just not positive that it was Oxycontin, and I remember it wasn't coke.
#274 Re: The Garden » The Wrestling thread » 845 weeks ago
I just saw something about it, but damned if I can find it now that I'm looking. I think they said they found a bunch of Oxycontin and a small straw in her kitchen, but don't quote me on that.
#275 Re: Guns N' Roses » Reading, United Kingdom - August 27, 2010 (Reading Festival) » 845 weeks ago
Well for all the BS I got to say. Guns N Roses never looked as tight knit and close a band since '87 as they did in Reading and Leeds.
that band shot of them all sitting on stage. 4tus breaking his legendary silence and even Dj's seeming fondness for his band mates really shone through. They looked like a family up there
The band looked tight knit in 92-93 too. I'm not saying they aren't, but looks aren't always reality.
#276 Re: Guns N' Roses » Leeds, United Kingdom - August 29, 2010 (Leeds Festival) » 845 weeks ago
^especially at a festival
#277 Re: Guns N' Roses » GN'R Twitter Updates » 845 weeks ago
Man, that's a rough crowd to win over. Period. I won't be shocked if there's a riot tonight.
Naah, People have to give a shit to riot.
That's the beauty of a festival, it's not 10,000 people just there to see them.
#278 Re: Guns N' Roses » Leeds, United Kingdom - August 29, 2010 (Leeds Festival) » 845 weeks ago
I see it like this:
The price of having a girl friend with big tits and a great ass is that every other guy in the room is going to hit on her.
The price of having a guy with the chrisma, frontman abilities, voice, and musical skills of Axl Rose is that sometimes he's going to tell people to go fuck themselves and get involved in drama like this.
It is what it is. Frustrating for the fans who miss out, but it's just the cost of doing business with GNR, the upside is the awesome records and great peformances we get on the nights this shit doesn't happen.
I would say you're closer if the girl with big tits and a great ass fucked most of those guys who hit on her, and didn't see anything wrong with her behavior.
#279 Re: Guns N' Roses » Leeds, United Kingdom - August 29, 2010 (Leeds Festival) » 845 weeks ago
jorge76 wrote:johndivney wrote:the root of the issue is an 11pm or even 11:30pm curfew is inherently wrong & people should be protesting the issue instead of letting it & rock n roll become standardised & homogenised. anyone who appreciates the freedom music, rock n roll, affords should be above nonsensical & detrimental rules that take away from the experience (that same rule of thumb applies to the setlist complaints btw).
rock n roll shouldn't be dictated to by money men, concert promoters or local councils. it should controlled by those who believe in it.Those things apply to rock and roll at every level. When I was a teenager my band decided we wanted to play in a Park, so we told a bunch of people, set up, and started to play. The cops came and told us we had to quit, we couldn't just do that. Even at 17 or 18 we said "Sorry Sir, We didn't know that" and went and probably played some more at somebody's house.
Playing local clubs, if you don't do what the clubowners want, they aren't going to want you back. You'll soon you'll start running out of places to play.
"Money men, concert promoters or local councils", are all part of what makes it the music "business".
why can't we change it? why does it have to be the way these people say it has to be?
GnR have a platform, or rather axl has a platform, cause he's got a catalogue of outstanding songs behind him & a strong brand name. it should be expected of someone with that power to be questioning authority & the rules of the bizness. he should be applauded rather than derided. it's the normal people like bono & jon bon jovi who have by and large sucked all the value out of classic rock by their adherence to the status quo's rules; they've thwarted not only rock n rolls evolution but are killing it by having validated a standardised way of behaving that's as phoney and fake as your next pop-princess or boyband. what we've ended up with is a world of the killers, arcade fire, the hold steady.
GnR have always existed outside those parameters. GnR have always been about freedom of expression - no matter how petty it gets it's still a damn sight more honourable than any of the boring rule-abiding sheep that are held in such high esteem by their fellow flocks.
Blindly following authority and blindly challenging it neither one do anyone any good.
Axl wants to rebel against the system he can pick legitimate battles.
#280 Re: Guns N' Roses » Leeds, United Kingdom - August 29, 2010 (Leeds Festival) » 845 weeks ago
the root of the issue is an 11pm or even 11:30pm curfew is inherently wrong & people should be protesting the issue instead of letting it & rock n roll become standardised & homogenised. anyone who appreciates the freedom music, rock n roll, affords should be above nonsensical & detrimental rules that take away from the experience (that same rule of thumb applies to the setlist complaints btw).
rock n roll shouldn't be dictated to by money men, concert promoters or local councils. it should controlled by those who believe in it.
Those things apply to rock and roll at every level. When I was a teenager my band decided we wanted to play in a Park, so we told a bunch of people, set up, and started to play. The cops came and told us we had to quit, we couldn't just do that. Even at 17 or 18 we said "Sorry Sir, We didn't know that" and went and probably played some more at somebody's house.
Playing local clubs, if you don't do what the clubowners want, they aren't going to want you back. You'll soon you'll start running out of places to play.
"Money men, concert promoters or local councils", are all part of what makes it the music "business". If Axl hates that business (and there's nothing wrong with hating it) he can stay at home and release albums to the internet like Izzy does.
