nah, that stanza is the kinda crap fred durst woulda spewed.
DDM is a weird one, Axlin is ot$ when he says it's a mixed bag - like he what he quotes is amongst the worst things axl has committed to tape but paradoxically it also has some brilliant lyrics & an amazing delivery & of course possibly the best GnR solo outside of Nightrain

it really typifies the brutal honesty at the core of axl's work - some of it veers perilously close to cheese but mostly it's shockingly accurate

Trash collected by the eyes/ & dumped into the brain/Said it tears into our conscious thoughts

i think you're being a little generous with the truth there
how often did/have we hear/d OMG/Rhiad/Silkworms? did DOTF ever get aired or just appear in the setlist? TAY/TWAT/IRS have all been dropped, same with ITW i believe. take those four songs alone & recycle them with others in the setlist & a whole lot of complaints about the set would be forgotten - which really brings me to my point: how easy it would be for them, & how beneficial it would be to everyone, for them to change the setlist by three r four songs per night.

now what i don't get is the comparison to bob dylan & other bands. i know what you're trying to say but i just think it's irrelevant.
i believe GnR shouldn't be compared to what other bands do or have done. i think GnR should be calling their own tune - which is what they're actually doing, the problem is it's a boring one - & blaze their own trail, they should be making up their own rules & presenting their own live show without any influence from outsiders.

people were saying they were surprised @ the audiences reaction when Estranged dropped & about how that song has survived & flourished through the fanbase. well i wasn't surprised & i think GnR have another ten or so songs capable of having the same "holy shit!" moments @ GnR gigs. i have faith in the back catalogue & i know that people going to the shows would love to hear the likes of TAY/RNDTH/Civil War/Breakdown/Perfect Crime/DTJ. but it seems like Axl doesn't have that faith or he just doesn't care that much about what he is presenting to the fans.

Naltav said: "If 2006 is the last time you saw them, you'll most likely get plenty of songs you haven't seen live yet."

i say, even if 1986 is the last time you saw them, you'll most likely get plenty of songs you've seen live already.

we should be going into a GnR show completely unprepared for what's going to happen - Axl & the band shouldn't be the one's unprepared. obv we're gonna get SCOM/NR but there are 30 songs of GnR's own making they could play around the hits & that's where the unpredictability & spontaneity would come into it. they're meant to be a versatile rock n roll band not a bunch of overrehearsed showponies trotting out the same 18tracks per night in the same order.
there is so much scope for improving the live show but the band & captain don't seem to give a shit. get paid.

i'm pretty sure i remember an old Axl interview where he mentions the setlists & says about not wanting to play the same songs for the exact reason i stated - that fans come to more than one show.

i might've just dreamed that tho..

no offense but that is absolute bullshit
plenty of people will go to more than 1 show on a tour, & has been the case since the 60's. plenty of people'll experience the one show despite having tix for different nights, in thqt regard it's a lack of respect for the fanbase
& you don't have to follow every gig to know it's a lazy setlist. you barely have to have been following GnR the past 20/5 yrs to know it's lame that Brownstone/KOHD are still around.