You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#331 Re: Guns N' Roses » IF CD doesnt outdo Contraband » 911 weeks ago
You can't compare the two sales-wise. People buy less albums than when Contraband came out. Record sales have declined even further.
And who cares?
Exactly. 
#332 Re: Guns N' Roses » IF CD doesnt outdo Contraband » 911 weeks ago
Chinese Democracy will sale more than Contraband...period. I don't know about first week sales but LONG term it will sale better and with good reason...it's a better album.
Contraband sold in part due to a great single (Slither) but that was the best song on the album. Only a couple other mediocre songs were left (imo) so the album cooled off. With Chinese Democracy the first single is doing well and it is not the best song. Better will be out soon and Street of Dreams is a sure fire hit. There Was a Time, IRS, Sorry, and If The World are all possible hits as well. This album may take longer but will sell quite a bit more in the end and will remembered long after Contraband is forgotten. Liberturd...well I won't even comment on that piece of crap.
***This is NOT a dig at Slash fans. I am a fan of both Slash and Axl, no sides taken, just an honest opinion.
#333 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns ‘N Roses: Dynamics and quality win the Loudness Wars » 911 weeks ago
Very cool, thanks for sharing Russ! I definitely would like to see a return to quality recording myself.
#334 Re: Guns N' Roses » SEBASTIAN BACH Says 'Chinese Democracy' Is 'The Definition Of Great Ro » 911 weeks ago
The laugh I got out of it was Bach referring to the "Bach Sound System". I mean, if you're gonna brag about your sound set up, I'm assuming you'd throw a different turntable in the mix other then a Ion USB one.
I got to agree with you there Russ. That was funny, not that it is a bad system but certainly not the type you stick out your chest and brag about. 
#335 Re: Guns N' Roses » SEBASTIAN BACH Says 'Chinese Democracy' Is 'The Definition Of Great Ro » 911 weeks ago
So can someone educate me on if Vinyl sounds better than lossless audio or CD quality audio (leave lossy and compressed formats like mp3 to die) and if so why?
I'm 31 but swapped from records to buying CDs around the time I was 15 I think....i'm genuinely interested...cos I always loved the tactile ness of records more...so i could be pursuaded to go get me another player and start getting everything new that way.
Until a couple of years ago I worked in a company where I was fortunate enough to have people like Polk, Yamaha, Dennon, NHT, etc come in and demonstrate their new products all the time. I was heavily trained in audio and I'll answer this for you the best I can.
First let me say CD is SUPERIOR overall to vinyl. One reason is it has unmatched clarity, however with the clarity you get a harsh "bright" sound when compared to analog. Other reasons are cds are more compact, hold more information, have a longer lifespan.
The advantage of vinyl is it has a "warmer" sound and not as "bright" or "harsh" as a cd. When a vinyl record is in new condition (after awhile vinyl loses quality because the needle will wear the record, whereas a cd only has a laser reading it) I find it to be a better sound. It replicates "real life" sound a little more realisticly for the most part. There are exceptions in my opinion, cds can capture the female voice, strings, and piano a bit better. Bass, electric guitar, the male voice and drums seem to benefit more from vinyl. So if you like classical music or Mariah Carey then it will be tough to beat the sound of a cd. If you prefer rock or rap you will benefit from the sound of vinyl...UNTIL you play the bass at very high levels, vinyl recordings lose bass quality after a certain db is obtained and will distort quicker than their cd counterpart. I play my music fairly loud and it isn't an issue for me but you guys who prefer the "boom" of some rap music wouldn't be happy with this one drawback.
Of course this is simply preference just like speaker preference. Some people prefer "bright" sounding speakers like Infinity while others prefer more "full" speakers like Polk. It's the same basic thing. I do lean to the fuller sound of vinyl but my collection is 90% cd. The biggeset reasons for that is I play most of my music while in my vehicle and the recording process (transferring to other formats) is much easier with a cd.
#336 Re: Guns N' Roses » Better Official Single 12/02/08 » 911 weeks ago
If any song will help this album it will be Better. From the reaction I have received when playing the songs Street of Dreams should be the one that follows afterwards.
#337 Re: Guns N' Roses » Emo Dorks & The Hip Hop MTV Generation Today » 911 weeks ago
slips wrote:Gunslinger wrote:I personally thought bands like Alice in Chains, Soundgarden, Mother Love Bone, Pearl Jam, etc were hardly forgettable but I do respect a difference of opinion.
My question would be what bands of today would you put at the same level as those I listed?
Guns, Metallica, AC/DC, U2, Green Day.
???? Bands of TODAY. All these bands are of yesteryear. I don't mean old bands with new albums.
If you have an album today, doesn't that make you a band of today.
I guess it's a matter of opinion but I say not really. It's old bands putting out new albums. Not "bands of today". So...where are these bands of today that equal any of those I listed? I like music from almost all decades from the 60's until the 90's. However I can't think of even ONE solid band from 2000 up. If someone has a few they think is equal to the greats that came before I'd love to hear them. That's not sarcasm, I'm serious. I am always up for good music.
#338 Re: Guns N' Roses » Question to James and all the other mods about Beta and Fernando. » 911 weeks ago
um beta doesnt like me much
She WANTS you Neemo...confess! 
anybody can post here as long as they treat the members with respect...but no i wouldnt suck up to please the powers that be
Amen to that. That is one of the key reasons that this community has survived since its beginning.
#339 Re: Guns N' Roses » A Count of Musical Performers On CD » 911 weeks ago
Good post, it's mind boggling the time and cast that went into this thing.
#340 Re: Guns N' Roses » Emo Dorks & The Hip Hop MTV Generation Today » 911 weeks ago
Gunslinger wrote:Von Solo wrote:Some of us found the grunge movement and the majority of '90s alt. rock to be disposable and forgettable. What's the good old days to some is just more of the same for the rest. I don't think music's taken a downward spiral necessarily. I think it's just sucked that bad for that much longer.
I personally thought bands like Alice in Chains, Soundgarden, Mother Love Bone, Pearl Jam, etc were hardly forgettable but I do respect a difference of opinion.
My question would be what bands of today would you put at the same level as those I listed?
Guns, Metallica, AC/DC, U2, Green Day.
???? Bands of TODAY. All these bands are of yesteryear. I don't mean old bands with new albums.
Why not celebrate diversity. Isn't today all about tolerance, and having an open mind?
Saying the quality is lesser isn't intolerance...it's taste.
