You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#31 Re: Guns N' Roses » Wtf happened to…Madagascar » 212 weeks ago
I think It was Budapest 2006.
Yep, very good version:)!
#32 Re: Guns N' Roses » Appetite For Distortion - Episode 256: 90s and 00s Axl Stories » 230 weeks ago
Sigh. If only the red head had 1/10 the work ethic of Slash. The stuff on Snakepit is good with Axl singing it would have been great.
I think there is a difference between recording and releasing music. Axl has a record studio at home, so maybe he recorded hundreds of songs? I think the problem is:
1. Legal conflict with the record company. He still has to deliver 1 album and then wants to be independent. The label wants to renew the contract with leads to a legal vacuum (remind axl's "victory or dead" attitude...);
2. Afraid to failure when he puts out an new record (perfectiosm). Just lay some vocals like he did with the contribution to Baz his album (Angel Down) or rock the rock. That was pure rnr.
#33 Re: Guns N' Roses » It's happening. » 298 weeks ago
Tortilla_Man wrote:The "New Chapter" spot was a Live Nation commercial for a European Tour
Live Nation care about 1 thing, Ticket Sales
There is a new album, and the tour March onwards is a new tour.
It is badly advertised, I was hoping for better, but it is what it is.
The Miami concert is an outlier, I am assuming this is when the first new track is set to appear, I don't know., but it all appears to be well planned.
Awesome, thanks for the info:)
#34 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Album Thread » 298 weeks ago
Getting my hopes up 
#35 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Album Thread » 298 weeks ago
It's pretty pathetic that this band can't be normal when it comes to new music.
It's not hard to say hey, we are working on some new material. I hope you like it when we release it.
Axl did inform us in the past with several Chinese Democracy release dates, but the label refused to release the album. I guess he has learned from the past. However, with slash back in gnr, i guess the label is more interested to release a new album.
#36 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Album Thread » 300 weeks ago
kemmep wrote:wasted wrote:Yeah I also if GNR has contract with rec comp they can’t release a GNR record without them, otherwise what’s the point of the contract. It’s not just the they own the rights to material they paid to have made in some way.
I have read somewhere that gnr owes the reconrd company 1 more album & after that, i guess they are free to release music. When gnr is released from the record company, i'm curious what they will do.
Will they regularly release music? Can they use old recording sessions or does the record company not allow that? Who knows...
they can use old recording sessions but i think they need to pay the old record company since the record company were the ones that paid for them to be in the studio. cause if GNR themselves paid for studio time during UYI sessions then that music would 100% belong to GNR cause they paid for it. do you get a better understanding of that?
Hmmm, that would suck, cause they recorded tons of stuff during that period. Well, positive thing is: lets just start from scratch with slash & co.
#37 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Album Thread » 300 weeks ago
Yeah I also if GNR has contract with rec comp they can’t release a GNR record without them, otherwise what’s the point of the contract. It’s not just the they own the rights to material they paid to have made in some way.
I have read somewhere that gnr owes the reconrd company 1 more album & after that, i guess they are free to release music. When gnr is released from the record company, i'm curious what they will do.
Will they regularly release music? Can they use old recording sessions or does the record company not allow that? Who knows...
