misterID wrote:

Fuck, sorry guys, I pasted the wrong link on the Maher clip. No wonder there was confusion... Here's the real thing.

https://mobile.twitter.com/billmaher/st … 72/video/1

Go to 3:23. Scary accurate.

buzzsaw wrote:

You still have your fucking hard-on for me?  You know you really took someone down hard when they just can't let it go in spite of the fact I've hardly said a word in weeks. 

Yuck it up with you and your one supporter.  So many people have been laughing at you for months now that there's no way you'll ever recover from it.  Good day.

You have your head so far up your own ass...

Maher: "people complaining about Trump and Clinton being equally bad aren’t cynical, they’re just uneducated and apply their brainpower to “bullshit.”

I'm not sure I follow this - how did we get here? And who is your "one supporter"?

Holy shit, watch this and tell me if this description reminds you of anyone on this board...but he's not a millennial.

Smoking Guns wrote:

mitchejw wrote:

Wow what a sour response. I wrote that in about seven minutes on the toilet this morning.

While I may not be funny, I know about the electoral college. I know  that the Republicans have all the shit states that only have three electoral votes to pledge. If they're not three electoral votes little more than 4 or 5 electoral. college votes.

What's so difficult to understand about that? States Like North Dakota and South Dakota and Wyoming and Idaho and Montana. You know, all those inbred white states  that nobody lives in or wants to live in .

Pretty racist comment.

No shit. I don't want to hear anymore faux outrage coming from Mitch on this subject.

Smoking Guns wrote:

They were investigating Weiner and his texting of an underage girl and found the classified emails on his fucking phone. Holy shit.

It's so fitting for it to go in this direction.

So Hillary likes rigging elections? Why am I not shocked? Her comments about Russia meddling were very disingenuous.

Randall Flagg wrote:

AtariLegend wrote:

In the unlikely scenario it was 269-269, who do people assume the House would pick?

Sleazy Paul Ryan, Ted Cruz, another Republican or do would they just go with Trump?

The constitution says congress can only vote on the 3 candidates with highest amount of EVs. Since only 2 will get any EVs, it'd be between Trump and Clinton. They'd probably still vote in Trump.

Imagine if McMullin won Utah and the House picked him.

mitchejw wrote:

James Lofton wrote:

If you pulled that from the Onion it's their worst article ever. The least they could do is learn the basics of the electoral college.

Wow what a sour response. I wrote that in about seven minutes on the toilet this morning.

While I may not be funny, I know about the electoral college. I know  that the Republicans have all the shit states that only have three electoral votes to pledge. If they're not three electoral votes little more than 4 or 5 electoral. college votes.

What's so difficult to understand about that? States Like North Dakota and South Dakota and Wyoming and Idaho and Montana. You know, all those inbred white states  that nobody lives in or wants to live in .

Have you ever left Chicago?  Met the people that create all the food and shit no one in your city is willing/capable to make?  Montana and Wyoming are gorgeous. They lack the urban component that makes Chicago the deadliest city in the country. I'll take a week on a ranch in Montana every time over a week in Chicago staring at concrete and paying 2x as much for mediocre food.