You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#6611 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 931 weeks ago
Back to the original question, I don't think Azoff was brought in to get Bucket back. He was brought in to resurrect and reignite the Gnr brand by whatever means necessary. I still think he has a dual purpose of releasing CD and putting together a reunion.
#6612 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 931 weeks ago
semantics...he is not a rock star by your definition...YOU are correct. By my definition, he is a rock star among rock stars....the general public are sheep. I discount them almost all together. He is respected amongst his peers-the true measure of what a rock star is to ME. I am done as well. 
ps I need a drink...almost happy hour on the east coast...Tommy's my boy and I got to defend him on these forums.
#6613 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 931 weeks ago
bands like Matchbox 20....being an example? And, I guarantee you they sought Tommy out.....not the other way around. Weak comeback. I can go toe to toe with you all day long if you want.:haha:
#6614 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 931 weeks ago
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsUFyKRu … hp?id=2876
Tommy on the David Letterman show in 1993....not the Mats
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e_DpGqgrKw
Tommy on mtv as interview for just him
what the fuck qualifies as a rock star?
#6615 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 931 weeks ago
so being interviewed by Billboard is meaningless because you and whoever you hang out with are fucking clueless when it comes to 80's alternative/indie/college rock? Have any of these musicians you've been around all your life been interviewed by Billboard? Billboard obviously thinks he is "rock star" enough to warrant a full length interview. Please, he is a rock star in the music industry.....not a household name.....but a well known name in the "MUSIC INDUSTRY" which is all I have ever claimed. You are the one with clouded judgement and some crazy fucking misconception that somehow you know everything about music and rock and roll because you studied it or play it or whatever. The reality stays the same......he was on MTV and the David Letterman show and Saturday Night Live and literally hundreds of other media outlets WAY before 1998. Those are cold hard facts. Just go youtube him and The Replacements. Get the fuck over yourself for a second and quit arguing semantics. I am talking straight up facts when it comes to things he has done in rock and roll and media outlets he has been exposed on.
#6616 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 931 weeks ago
James, that is scary..:nervous:
Buzz, he is not a household name in popular culture.....neither is Duff really...just Axl and Slash fill that role. But, he is a known and respected "rock star" in the music industry and trust me they were rebellious hard drinking rock stars. My point remains the same, if you did not know who Tommy Stinson was before 1998, then your overall knowledge of rock and roll is fairly limited. Simple as that. I don't care if someone in the jungles of Brazil knows who he is.....but he is a household name among musicians, critics, and music historians.
#6617 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 931 weeks ago
I am sick of this shit. Buzz, does Billboard give full length interviews to people who are not rock stars? Have you ever seen any current or former new Gnr member, outside of Tommy, interviewed by any major music publication? When was Duff's last full length interview with Billboard? He is every bit the rock star Duff ever dreamed of being. You obviously were pretty closed minded during your years of following music and you just proved your ignorance about music history when you say you never heard of him prior to Gnr. That is simply ignorant and shows that you have a very small understanding of the history of rock and roll.:thumbup:
http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/news/art … 1003792309
#6618 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 931 weeks ago
Tommy's role in the band is to be a consistent solid anchor. Yes, you could play his parts easily...just as you could Duff's. They are really similar type of players. Gnr is a guitar band and the guitar needs to be providing the flash....or Pitman or any of the other 8 members of Axl's orchestra. Tommy fits because some parts don't need to be flashy...just "solid". With all the other shit going on in these songs, the last thing they need is Les Claypool or Flea type bass.
#6619 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Azoff factor re-examined: could he be targeting Bucket, not Slash? » 931 weeks ago
I took Tommy's comments about Bucket as he felt that Bucket left them and he was mad that he left. Tommy is known as a very loyal guy and probably felt betrayed by his departure. I would assume he also knew that Bucket was all over the material and that his departure would be a problem.
and ps, if Tommy leaves, then we have absolutely no true "rock stars" left in the band. Say what you want, but Tommy is well known and very well respected in the music industry....much more so than Robin Finck. Tommy has been a legitimate rock star since he was 15 and will be an important part of promotion for the record. He is the only member in the band with a known track record in the media-as evidenced by a recent full length interview with Billboard, Spin, and multiple other music publications. 
#6620 Re: Guns N' Roses » A Random Forum Post about Finck » 931 weeks ago
We really don't know what kind of writer he is at all. He is 36 years old and has almost no copyrighted/publishing song credits to his name....the jury is still WAY out on him in that regard.:/
