You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#9001 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Official Site Updated » 895 weeks ago
Good point polluxlm....
I hope the reaction is better than Oh My God.... Oh My God that was Awful.
#9002 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Official Site Updated » 895 weeks ago
Its kind of like a long shitty hand job waiting for a nut, we are almost there. When we should be happy, we are really just relieved we don't have t wait anymore. Bring on the Sex!
#9003 Re: Guns N' Roses » Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed » 895 weeks ago
Maybe its a message about Slavery?
#9004 Re: Guns N' Roses » Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed » 895 weeks ago
i gotta stop posting in here ...fun times
excitign news GnR is in the media and we shall hear the first single on the radio shortly
Mysteron says the plan is to have CD out in 2008
can't complain
Neemo, I just noticed you are from Hamilton, as is my Guitar Teacher... Interesting. And I live in freaking Alabama. He is 32 or 33 years old. He is a cool guy.
#9005 Re: Guns N' Roses » Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed » 895 weeks ago
Neemo wrote:James Lofton wrote:$200??:nervous::nervous::nervous: Is there something in these articles I missed? You have to buy a bunch of accessories??
well you cant play the game if you dont have the accessories...if you have rb1 then obviously you got all the shit you need but if you dont then you need the box set which is like $170 or something plus taxes
Well, I'm not buying guitars and drum kits and other assorted shit. Even if I wanted to play this, the costs of that aren't worth the little time I would spend playing it.
And what if the song is as bad as Oh My God... I spent $17 on that fucking CD for that one Shit ass song. I can't imagine spending $200 for a Ryiad type quality song.
#9006 Re: Guns N' Roses » Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed » 895 weeks ago
Smoking Guns wrote:James, we are excited, but I am sick of getting teased.... This isn't a song between albums like Civil war Was to hold us over. we have been waiting since 1994, or 1999. Instead of trying to get new fans, take care of the ones you have and give US a proper single first. What is next, a cornrow helmet to wear while we sing a song on rock band we don't know? For Rock Band, they should have gone with a Classic that EVERYONE will want to play.
AC/DC has a new album coming out. They gave the game a classic, not a new song off the album....
Are you saying you would have preferred on old song on Rock Band? They are giving us a single, essentially. Buckethead fans got "Jordan" off Guitar Hero the day it came out. We'll get the same with "Shackler's Revenge."
If I wasn't a GNR fan, I would go with a sure fire hit, not an experiment. Does this GNR stand test of time like some of the songs on this list? Not sure. I am glad its a new song, the video game may not if the song blows.
#9007 Re: Guns N' Roses » Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed » 895 weeks ago
Smoking Guns wrote:WHAT IS NEXT? A GNR SINGLE IN A CRACKER JACK BOX?
That'd be awesome. I'm much more apt to buy cracker jacks than Rock Band.
Was that a fat guy thing to say?
Not at all. I love cracker jacks!
#9008 Re: Guns N' Roses » Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed » 895 weeks ago
James, we are excited, but I am sick of getting teased.... This isn't a song between albums like Civil war Was to hold us over. we have been waiting since 1994, or 1999. Instead of trying to get new fans, take care of the ones you have and give US a proper single first. What is next, a cornrow helmet to wear while we sing a song on rock band we don't know? For Rock Band, they should have gone with a Classic that EVERYONE will want to play.
AC/DC has a new album coming out. They gave the game a classic, not a new song off the album....
#9009 Re: Guns N' Roses » Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed » 895 weeks ago
i can't beleive peopel are so excited about this .... its not even an official band source....anyway its one track and i doubt we will here a perfect version of it for a couple weeks after the game is released as someone will have to score perfect for us to hear the song properly
anyway for me its album or bust and, like buzzsaw and smoking guns.....i'll beleive it when i see it
i caution everyone to not get too carried away we've all been down this road before
Neemo, its getting to the point of fucking lame. RELEASE THE MOTHER FUCKER. I DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT DAMN CARTOON VIDEO GAMES. WHAT IS NEXT? A GNR SINGLE IN A CRACKER JACK BOX?
This will now be the 10th song from CD we would have heard....
Maybe the plan is to never release CD in a propper way, but to slowly release each song one by one so we spend $400 for one song to punish all of us for downloading the leaks?!?!?!?!?!
#9010 Re: Guns N' Roses » Shackler's Revenge: REALLY confirmed » 895 weeks ago
So the bone they throw us is to spend a lot of money on a video game? Surely you jest... ha.
It better be on fucking itunes.
It better be able to hang with all those classic songs or it will get skipped over for more fun, famous songs.
If this songs sux it will be the laughing stock of the game. But I am sure it won't suck, but Let There Be Rock will be one of the most fun songs to play. They probably should have gone with a Paradise City or so if you are the game, but for GNR a new song is cool.
