You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#911 Re: Guns N' Roses » Moscow, Russia (2 Show Discussion) » 731 weeks ago
Ali wrote:russtcb wrote:Ah. I've heard this exact quote from another person before and it's as incorrect now as it was then. See, you're not seeing anyone here complain about a show their not at. You're seeing people complain about the state of arrested development that GN'R seems to be in.
I'm a big "set list defender" and even I think maybe it's time to stop playing the same ol' same old.
To clarify even further, complaining about a show they're aren't at would be more like complaining about the quality of Axl's vocals, the poor sound mix or the way a band member was playing something all based on a YouTube clip or something like that.
With all due respect, Russ, I have to disagree. A comment like "100% cash grab" implies to me (at least) that the band came out and played with no to minimal effort and just went through the motions so to speak. The problem with that is that cannot be discerned through a setlist alone. Hence, I do feel that is criticizing a show one is not at.
As far as the arrested development, I don't see how that can be stated to be the case when we know for a fact they have been working on a new album, per Richard Fortus. If one means the setlist specifically, that is another story, and obviously that hasn't changed much since the NA tours. But, the Russian and European crowds didn't get to hear "Estranged" or "Civil War" in 2010.
Ali
The term "cash grab" in this particular thread was used specifically about the set list. The way you can tell is that no one spoke about GN'R performance or effort. The thing that was being discussed was the set list.
And if all you have to lean on as proof that they're moving forward is a quote from Richard Fortus saying they're working on a new album, you are armed with quite the weak argument.
And you're preaching to the choir in regards to the "well, they've added this, that or the other song since the last tour" however, the Russian crowd didn't even get Civil War and You're Crazy that those of us in North America did.
The long and the short of it is this; I believe users should be allowed to voice their opinion on the state of GN'R here. If it's negative and they've got an argument to back it up, then great, let's have a discussion. If you, I or anyone else disagrees and has an argument to back it up, now we're cooking.
But to stop by and accuse the user base of doing something they're not? That I won't let fly. To many intelligent folks on this board often well armed with a fantastic line of reasoning to watch them have to put up with that.
Not saying I'm of the intelligent kind, but I've seen GN'R in Rio 2001, Porto Alegre 2010, been following all the tours and concerts since Vegas 2000/2001 and I'm done.
I've said already that I've travelled 2000 miles to see them in Rio in 2001. I'm flying 6000 miles in June to catch Tom Petty in Hamburg.
While in Europe GNR will play THREE times close to me as a walk in the park (really, in Milan it's on the same block as my hostel) and I won't be attending because I won't handle money to Axl. He had my devotion, he had me following and believing in him for all of his craziness. I've justified his behavior, late starts, actions, his belief in Chinese Democracy but if that guy doesn't want to move on, who am I to shove it down his throat?
I'll only be excited by new music. That's all there's left now.
He was able to even lose his enigmatic figure. Today is far more common to see Axl Rose in concert than to catch a good movie on the Theaters.
#912 Re: Guns N' Roses » Moscow, Russia (2 Show Discussion) » 731 weeks ago
I need to make two points before continuing:
It's a known fact the guys in GNR today kick some serious asses when playing live.
The shows are fun to the people who attend them and 97% of the people that go to the concerts and/or the GNR fanbase are NOT hardcore and are NOT on the boards.
Knowing this:
SHAME ON YOU, AXL.
It's not anyone's responsability for you to MOVE THE FUCK ON.
It's not Universal's, Jimmy Iovine's, Beta's, Fernando's or Slash's. It's completely yours.
The setlist trash talk is easy and to some extent, at least until the american tour ended, I was ok with it and, to some extension, was comfortable with how things were. If you'd look closely, the band hadn't played/promoted cd on US, so a tour with the same setlist/stage setting/etc was only rational.
You'd think that coming to places for the second time would make the perfect scenario for Axl to start deploying the future, as he did in 2001 in Rio.
Even for Axl Rose that would only make sense.
If and only if he wasn't his worst enemy. Wanna go around the world cash grabbing? Is THAT your ideal of integrity and not selling out?
Is that how you prove the world how you love the new band and want it recognized as Guns N' Roses? Is that in what you believe?
If so, I'm sorry, but you're fuckin' delusional. You just lost me, dude.
#913 Re: Guns N' Roses » Moscow, Russia (2 Show Discussion) » 731 weeks ago
Same old, same old.
Not that I was expecting anything different.
#914 Re: Guns N' Roses » Officially Licensed Merchandising from 1997? » 731 weeks ago
Invite me over to this '06 BR session!
#915 Re: Guns N' Roses » Officially Licensed Merchandising from 1997? » 731 weeks ago
My t-shirt just got shipped... Anxiously waiting...
I thought this design was pretty damn cool and reminds me of the official artwork not released...
My other goal is to get the "How Are You?" grenade t-shirt...
#916 Re: Guns N' Roses » Officially Licensed Merchandising from 1997? » 731 weeks ago
that first shirt is generic lookin as hell
97. A world dominated by Green Day, Offspring and soft punk, emocore...
Dunno, the Style fits that era, not GNR...
#917 Re: Guns N' Roses » Officially Licensed Merchandising from 1997? » 731 weeks ago
Strange that the 2002 merch was available right at the start of the tour, with Finck, Buckethead and GN'R's designs.
Finck's was all silhouettes. This one is a photo. Perhaps the picture was taken during rehearsals or made available during the tour?
Anyway, that 1997 t-shirt is puzzling me!
#918 Re: Guns N' Roses » Officially Licensed Merchandising from 1997? » 731 weeks ago
You're welcome, Russ! The design you've mentioned is the one I've bought today! 
I'll embed the 1997 image here.
This Robin Finck t-shirt: is this from 2006?
I remember in 2002 there were a few with his designs, but nothing like this - and since this one has the beard and stuff I assume it's from 2006.
#919 Guns N' Roses » Officially Licensed Merchandising from 1997? » 731 weeks ago
- otto
- Replies: 55
http://www.ebay.com/itm/GUNS-N-ROSES-MA … 976wt_1270
I bought stuff from this seller in the past, he's the real deal.
Perhaps there was an album on the horizon and things were starting to roll so they were prepping merch?
#920 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Apocalyptic Love Full Song » 731 weeks ago
Sounds like a shitty Buckcherry song. Boring generic music and Myles voice is annoying.
This.
