You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#981 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 897 weeks ago

oh we could go on forever... we'll start a die hard 1 quote thread...

#982 Re: The Sunset Strip » Comic Book Adaptations » 897 weeks ago

Neemo wrote:

i dunno comic book adaptions to movies usually suck IMO...with a weekely or monthy story its hard to fit it all in a couple hours

also movies need the story to keep moving...sometimes comics milk a story line for far too long

the best adaption i've seen of a comic is the current resurection of the TMNT cartoon series...the first few episodes of that was pretty good a few years ago

man i was in love with that original comic...i still have the graphic novels 11

i was a little kid when the original comic came out... my FAVORITE...
i sent out for one of the little figures and never got it...
after they blew up, i lost interest....
the old blac k and white shit .... ahhh those were the days

#983 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 897 weeks ago

A Private Eye wrote:

Die Hard, not like I'd never seen it before but you just gotta watch it when it's on.

'You ask for miracles, I give you the F..B..I'

"come to the coast.. we'll get together.. have a few laughs...."

#984 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 897 weeks ago

curious case of BB and step brothers.... both great

#985 Re: The Sunset Strip » 24: Season 7 » 897 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:

I've never watched an episode of 24. Quite a few shows from this decade I never dove into.

Now that I'm done with Sopranos, I'm considering watching either this or Lost. Or maybe West Wing.

definitely go with 24....but stop after the first season...you WILL have a STRONG URGE to keep going but don't.... you'll thank me later

#987 Re: The Garden » Anyone else losing interest? » 898 weeks ago

downliner wrote:

Strike 3 for the admins. Just waiting on new material to surface to regain my interest.

hell... new ANYTHING...

#988 Re: The Sunset Strip » Comic Book Adaptations » 898 weeks ago

Von Solo wrote:

This current era of comic book adaptations was really kickstarted by the intelligent, respectful approach originally taken to the X-Men property by Bryan Singer and the fan response that followed. While its been an overall mixed bag, the general consensus among comic fans, myself included, is that a lot of these current adaptations are at least getting something right. Axlin08, I think your words hold truer to the comic movies of old, specifically the '80s and barren '90s (Judge Dredd, The Phantom, The Shadow et al.). Some would say the original Batman or Superman franchises. While later entried certainly ran those franchises into the ground, I largely stand behind the originals. For example, Singer's criminally underrated Superman Returns was a real harkening back to Donner's original Superman. It was essentially an homage with heavy religious symbolism, which apparently offended many peoples' idea about this iconic character. Movies like the upcoming Watchmen and even Sin City and V for Vendetta before it are showing a move by the studios away from the comfort of their superhero properties and into strict comic adaptation. That's something really exciting to fans. We've never seen anything like this coming out of Hollywood before. A movie like Watchmen being made on that scale and that faithfully (or so it would appear) is a real leap of faith for a commercially driven industry to take. It shows a lot of goodwill and faith in this existing fanbase. For once, comic fans should have little to complain about in the way of being taken seriously. They rule Hollywood.

i completely agree with you on superman returns... great film.. other than the fact that superman doesn't kick the shit outta anyone, and the whole "sequel to superman 3" angle that creates a shitload of potholes like.. i thought lois' memory of bangin' supes and everything was wiped out...so how the fuck would she know that the kid is his?

...and c'mon... superman was gone for 5 years+clark kent was gone for 5 years+ Pulitzer prize winning "journalist"= no fucking clue whatsoever that kent is superman???  hey... i'l take a leap of faith with that one.. that's classic superman.. but the kid thing?

i was very excited as to where they were gonna go with the next film... until...
i heard that they were again "rebooting" the franchise...ugh
it's too bad. that guy was amazing as clark kent... had every one of reeve's little nerdy mannerisms DOWN... he was great

http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Superman … -9376.html

#989 Re: Guns N' Roses » Where Do We Go Now? » 898 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:

At this point I wouldn't be surprised if videos, a media blitz,etc. is being saved for a reissue of the album this year. They can let it ride its current wave and hope for that second wind when the reissue comes out. .

that's exactly what i've been thinking ever since axl said "all the real artwork will come out soon" and such...
i still think all the real promotion will start when the album is rereleased after the BB copies are gone...

how ridiculous is this?
we spend YEARS speculating.." when the album comes out..." now... we're like.."when the album gets put out again... " 17

reminds me of "Road to Perdition"...
"why are you always smiling?"
"because it's all so fucking hilarious..." 16

#990 Re: The Garden » Anyone else losing interest? » 898 weeks ago

Tommie wrote:

Don't get me wrong though guys, I'll still post all day in our off topic threads...i just get sick and tired of all the unnecessary drama associated with GnR. 

For the decade before the album came out it was different.  I had to put up with all the dumb bullshit that surrounds the band/album, now that I have the album, I'm still interested, but I don't feel obligated to pay attention to all the minute details of the soap opera.

my thoughts exactly, tommie....
i find myself lurking alot more now and posting in off topic threads... until something HAPPENS... i'm here for the community.. not so much gnr shit.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB