You are not logged in. Please register or login.

mitchejw
 Rep: 130 

Re: Current Events Thread

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

Joe Manchin should get a Nobel. Pelosi’s linkage of the bipartisan infrastructure bill to the nonsense at least 3 democratic senators have said no to all but assures Dementia Joe is in for an even tougher tenure as President. When’s the last time he answered questions without a teleprompter or an aide pulling him off stage?

This is the consequence of getting in bed with corporate journalist and Twitter dipshits who are confused about basic biology.

Look at the hyperbole on you...jumping on that social media narrative on dementia Joe...can't wait for your next post were you bash media.

Joe Manchin is a conservative (like you)...I'm not terribly impressed with him...there's no way a Democrat could get elected in West Virginia without have some conservative values.

It is funny though, bc as Trump encourages the purging of moderate centrists from the Republican Party (something you never notice or comment on) you're praising a moderate/centrist Democrat.

The biggest reason that I'm not impressed with Manchin is because he, along with so many others who've been in Congress for decades, wrote blank checks for perpetual war that was accomplished nothing.  The biggest social welfare program in this company is paying people to go halfway across the world and hold a gun. I'm not impressed with his sudden concerns about how much things cost.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/joe-manchin- … 52095.html

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: Current Events Thread

Mitch, it’s an objective truth that Biden’s cognitive abilities have declined. He often is unsure of who he’s talking to or staying in topic. This is easily verifiable by observing any public speech of his as a long tenured Senator, or even his time as VP, and contrasting it with any engagement from the past 8 months. For all the hyperbole and venom tossed at Trump’s off the cuff and ever present style, you’re incapable of pointing to any domestic or foreign issue Biden has not only handled better than Trump, but spoken on the topic more eloquently.

You admitted your criteria for comparing Trump and Biden is the lack of personal angst you feel with the current occupant. Good for you, but it’s not an intelligent or a discussable position.

Biden’s mental acuity is absolutely a discussion point and something that matters. The major networks almost daily had some psychologist diagnosing Trump without ever having interacted or engaged with him. Maybe you don’t know anything about medical ethics and specifically psychological ethics, but that was bottom of the barrel behavior for a board licensed psychologist.

Biden’s voice is completely absent from the infrastructure debate, his handling of migrants is abysmal and the images are vastly worse than anything the media snapshotted against Trump (even the Obama cages), and he’s done far more damage to NATO and European trust in the US than any of the vitriol put forth by the Atlantic or other journals.

Clinton’s lawyer was just indicted for lying about the Steele Dossier that you and millions of others thought was a smoking gun while Brennan and even Comey disgraced themselves with ambiguous and provacative rhetoric to make book sales. That’s the reality of our shared history.

And you think calling Biden “dementia Joe” due to his complete absence from public questions and repeated demonstration of an inability to speak coherently, is a partisan attack.

I mean, c’mon. This man is the worst President since Carter and more  Americans are growing to dislike him daily according to every poll available. But you’re just an informed defender, while I’m the clueless partisan who can only point to objective truths to qualify his claims roll

Smoking Guns
 Rep: 330 

Re: Current Events Thread

Smoking Guns wrote:

Our country is a shit show right now, thanks Joe.

mitchejw
 Rep: 130 

Re: Current Events Thread

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

Mitch, it’s an objective truth that Biden’s cognitive abilities have declined. He often is unsure of who he’s talking to or staying in topic. This is easily verifiable by observing any public speech of his as a long tenured Senator, or even his time as VP, and contrasting it with any engagement from the past 8 months. For all the hyperbole and venom tossed at Trump’s off the cuff and ever present style, you’re incapable of pointing to any domestic or foreign issue Biden has not only handled better than Trump, but spoken on the topic more eloquently.

You admitted your criteria for comparing Trump and Biden is the lack of personal angst you feel with the current occupant. Good for you, but it’s not an intelligent or a discussable position.

Biden’s mental acuity is absolutely a discussion point and something that matters. The major networks almost daily had some psychologist diagnosing Trump without ever having interacted or engaged with him. Maybe you don’t know anything about medical ethics and specifically psychological ethics, but that was bottom of the barrel behavior for a board licensed psychologist.

Biden’s voice is completely absent from the infrastructure debate, his handling of migrants is abysmal and the images are vastly worse than anything the media snapshotted against Trump (even the Obama cages), and he’s done far more damage to NATO and European trust in the US than any of the vitriol put forth by the Atlantic or other journals.

Clinton’s lawyer was just indicted for lying about the Steele Dossier that you and millions of others thought was a smoking gun while Brennan and even Comey disgraced themselves with ambiguous and provacative rhetoric to make book sales. That’s the reality of our shared history.

And you think calling Biden “dementia Joe” due to his complete absence from public questions and repeated demonstration of an inability to speak coherently, is a partisan attack.

I mean, c’mon. This man is the worst President since Carter and more  Americans are growing to dislike him daily according to every poll available. But you’re just an informed defender, while I’m the clueless partisan who can only point to objective truths to qualify his claims roll

You think that  if someone isn't screaming at the top of their lungs is absent from the conversation? Mind you Trump held up a dementia test that he claimed he passed during the final stretch of the campaign in 2020. Dumb as fuk. Who was that supposed to impress?

If Americans want a raving narcisstic lunatic screaming about nothing all the time as a president then they'll gladly vote him back in , in 2024 when he's fatter, more demented than ever and ridiculously out of touch like never before.

A soft voice is what I crave at the moment...not some slanderous retard who appeals to the worst traits in all of us.

Re: Current Events Thread

Sky Dog wrote:

Mitch, your guy stinks. It has nothing to do with Trump. So far, he is awful on almost every front. Inflation, the border, Afghanistan, stonewalled on his own agenda. Dang, just admit it. Forget Trump, there has to be someone better than him and Biden.

misterID
 Rep: 475 

Re: Current Events Thread

misterID wrote:

So, progressives seem to think stalking Kyrsten Sinema, following her into a bathroom, and try filming her through a stall while screaming about immigration and supporting Biden is a really good idea.

College debt forgiveness doesn't help poor people.
Forcing everyone to pay for child care, even those who don't have kids, for people who can afford their own child care, is a bad idea.
If your climate agenda doesn't include nuclear, you're not really serious about it.

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: Current Events Thread

misterID wrote:

So, progressives seem to think stalking Kyrsten Sinema, following her into a bathroom, and try filming her through a stall while screaming about immigration and supporting Biden is a really good idea.

College debt forgiveness doesn't help poor people.
Forcing everyone to pay for child care, even those who don't have kids, for people who can afford their own child care, is a bad idea.
If your climate agenda doesn't include nuclear, you're not really serious about it.

Those who want to admit millions of third world economic refugees whose carbon footprint would increase exponentially in the US aren’t really concerned about climate change either.

mitchejw
 Rep: 130 

Re: Current Events Thread

mitchejw wrote:

Those who stick their head in the ground and don't know third world countries industrializing like us is going to happen anyway...and were never really concerned with climate change either...

Let's keep doing the same thing....

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 139 

Re: Current Events Thread

mitchejw wrote:

Those who stick their head in the ground and don't know third world countries industrializing like us is going to happen anyway...and were never really concerned with climate change either...

Let's keep doing the same thing....


You think Afghanistan and El Salvador are going to be firing up coal factories?  Become booming nations on their own?  If you genuinely believed this, then you wouldn't be advocating we admit millions of their people into our country because of some limousine liberal guilt at your core.  No one is saying do the same thing, ID put forth the importance of going towards nuclear.  That obviously went over your head, but those of us who actually read multiple sources and try to have an informed opinion understand nuclear is the only viable solution to our growing energy needs with the least environmental cost.

Once again you've proven you lack any opinion or topic for discussion, and are just out there to bait.  I feel really sad for you as a person your life is so lonely you need to get negative attention on the internet from people who think you need professional help.

mitchejw
 Rep: 130 

Re: Current Events Thread

mitchejw wrote:

Oh I'm sure your social life is glowing...

You're right RF....you're supremely knowledgeable on all topics....how did we get here again?

I've always thought that this might be the only purpose to your posts here.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB