You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose Official Website » 38 hours ago

Gotta love Team Brazil for providing unintentional humor all the time.

Why on earth has he chosen this point in time to finally establish his own personal website when there is nothing going on to promote?

Visiting the site itself, there’s nothing there and it’s a really dull site.  I mean they can’t even give an effort on the “about “ section .  I think there’s like 2 sentences on that section.

#2 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 2 weeks ago

James wrote:

That level of impact can never happen again. We live in an era of internet, smartphones, a thousand cable channels, and short attention spans

Those days are lost now where a show can cross race, age, socioeconomic status and just kind of be something people can rally around and talk about.  Ditto with album releases as events.


I think we should all be happy to have experienced it (face it we are all the same age here) before it got lost and extinct to the ravages of time and progression.

#3 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2024 “Taking Off” » 6 weeks ago

When was the last time Axl Rose talked about writing and recording and releasing new music?  That is all you need to now.

The other guys (and this goes for the last 30 years) can say whatever they want .  They are not the ones holding it up.

#4 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2024 “Taking Off” » 7 weeks ago

James wrote:

The whole thing (the CD saga) was just one massive swindle since day one. I no longer believe there was ever a genuine attempt at "moving forward". It helps explain the Helter skelter nature of the project.

It started on day one....

OMG and Live Era in 99

Look which one got the big push.

I didn't realize it at the time but that helped set the tone.

The reunion era was just a continuation...it was not a legitimate reunion/reboot of the "band".

Having said that, I thank them for releasing the few songs we have.

This is just guessing but I still think at some part/point in his mind that he expected Slash and Duff to come back and help him finish the record.  That's why you had all the stuff about the reunion that almost happened in 2005.  In retrospect, I have to wonder what the hell Slash was hoping to accomplish by showing up in Las Vegas at the House of Blues in 2001.

As far as the current band goes, it's basically a continuation of 1993 EXCEPT that the parts are a little different and that they haven't solved whatever issues led to them breaking up in the first place.  This reunion is just all for touring revenue and nothing else.  There is /will be no attempt to write and record new music as a band anyway, even with the spectre of AFD turning 40 in a few years.

#5 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 7 weeks ago

James wrote:

It's that awkward unique period between 70s and 80s where it wants to be the gritty 70s but the 80s is seeping into it.

I need to watch even more movies from this period.

Most of these are found within 1980-85.  After that I'd say the 80s seeps in and it can be gritty but that 80s cheesiness is a damn drawback, Black Rain which was released in 89 is a good example.

Anyway, stuff like Ms. 45, and Cutter's Way are classified as 80s films but they belong in the 70s. 52 pick up (released in 1986) is really sleazy and I don't suffers as much as other film released in the second half of the 80s.

#6 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2024 “Taking Off” » 7 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:

The reunion gave Axl the excuse to stop pretending. He's not interested in his career or making music anymore. Hasn't been for a long time. Best he can do is sign off on some microwaved chinese leftovers from Slash & Duff. Other than that he's got nothing going. Just turn up for the gig, do some Vince Neil and cash the check.

I've decided that GN'R fans aren't expecting new music as much as they are expecting them just to act like a real band again. What's up, what's going on, we're going to be doing this etc. It's like going to wall mart and just sitting outside hoping they'll open up. No lights in the building, no sign on the door, just some old twinkies mashed out in the parking lot.

When they stop touring we'll never hear from him again.

Dude lost his muse a long time ago (somewhere in the 2000s I'd say).  And he isn't even interested in doing a simple singing on a song if the other guys did all the other stuff and all he had to do was show up and sing.

#7 Re: The Sunset Strip » Best Films of the 2000s » 8 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:

Around the time of Iron Man, The Dark Knight and the Avengers I would say. I remember thinking the Avengers would bomb because there had been some similar movies in the past that did not do so well. That whole "crossover superhero" type movie. When that was a smash hit I think they realized there was an untapped market for generic super hero movies. Before that you needed something special. A great actor and a great director. After Avengers suddenly every other movie was making a billion. So late 00s, early 10s.

Yeah, directing lately is just not good.  I can't even name a modern director that I like that started from the 2010s and onward.   Once the old guys die off it's going to be dire and just not creative or fun.

Now they just hire the guy "that knows" how to director superhero films.  I guarantee a bunch of these directors don't have any successes outside of the superhero stuff. 

James wrote:

On top of the superhero shit still going,..and remakes too, we have the woke nonsense drowning the industry, ruining IPs,  and so many streaming services creating an ocean of shit just so they can have content for their apps.

It's madness.

Another thing... comedies aren't funny anymore.

Yeah, the remakes.  They don't exist as totally diferent stories from the originals they ape from.  Take for example the 1997 remake the Jackal.  It takes the framework of the 1973 original but makes it it's own diferent and distinct story (complete w/suspect Richard Gere accent btw).  I think I may have enjoyed the remake more than the orignal which is kinda dry and boring.

Now?  I don't really see different stories .  I see them substituting minorities into the lead roles but the story remains the same and is a copy.

Funny you should mention streaming.  The industry is trying to kill off physical media.  But you want to know where you can find interesting stuff (from the past and present)?  Yep, those "niche labels" that distribute and sell discs.  Want 70-80s horror?  Multiple labels provide that.  Indie stuff?  Classic erotica?  Foreign films?  Mainstream stuff that was underseen?  You can even find Looney Tunes all on disc now.

It's just as the years go by, I just can't "identify" with some of this modern stuff.  And it's not because I'm reaching old fart level.  Some of this stuff just isn't good to watch or they just get some of the basic stuff (like the cityscape part we've talked about ) totally wrong.

#8 Re: The Sunset Strip » Best Films of the 2000s » 8 weeks ago

James wrote:

Yeah it's not a very good decade.  You can sense the trouble ahead for the industry.

Just curious but when did this change?  I still remember in the early mid 2000s where it was similar to the 90s in that there were a lot of choices in the type or amount of movies that were in theaters.  Yeah, there were still franchises like LOTR etc, but  I remember seeing the Others, Gangs of New York, Lost in Translation and even something like Memories of a Geisha playing in the theater.  As opposed to now where it's just franchises and maybe "message movies".

Did this change start developing in the late 2000s or the early 2010s? where you really see the creative bankruptcy take place.  I took a look at some of the best of 2010s films, and shit my list is going to be a ton of foreign films.

#9 Re: The Sunset Strip » Best Films of the 2000s » 9 weeks ago

On pure enjoyment and rewatchable level I think this decade fared higher than I thought.

Battle Royale
Infernal Affairs
About a Boy
Collateral
Oldboy
In Bruges
Lost in Translation
Casino Royale
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (aka the one w/Gary Oldman)
Inside Man
Up in the Air
Kill Bill Vol I
Spirited Away
Femme Fatale

I need to watch In the Bedroom.  Apparently, Wilkinson (RIP) got robbed of an Oscar that year for that movie.  I came close to putting Mullholland Drive on there but I've only seen it once.  I wanted to put in another Miike film but I wouldn't place Ichi the Killer over some of the other films.  Late 90s- mid 2000s is probably his prime.  He has slowed down the past 10 years or so.  Also almost put the Prestige on there.  It's probably the only Nolan film that I can kind of see his genius in.  The other ones I just find good and not great.  Oh, Death at a Funeral is also fun in that Brit comedy kind of way.

#10 Re: The Sunset Strip » Most Recent Movie You've Seen » 11 weeks ago

James wrote:

Society of the Snow - Until a few days ago I had no idea this existed. It's an Alive remake...one of my favorite 90s movies.

It was ok but I hated the editing style. I also didn't like how they handled certain aspects of the story...the lone woman dying is barely an afterthought here yet in reality it almost killed their spirit.

Loved how the actors took it seriously and went on crash diets to lose a bunch of weight. Made it so much more realistic.

The CGI plane crash was inferior to the 90s version.


I was kind of wondering about this once since it got nominated for a best foreign film oscar.  Looks like I'll pass.

The Outfit (1973).  Revenge film starring Robert Duvall.  Made in between the Godfather movies.  And it delivers. It's not complex, just delivers what is sets out to.  Gritty and cool.  Suprised it isn't better known to be honest.

Missing (2021).  Japanese film.  Saw this on Tubi.  The premise is a little misleading and it takes a bit to get started but once it gets into high gear I was totally into it.  Reminded me of those 2010's Korean films I used to watch a lot of.

Hunt (2022) Speaking of Korean, this one is an espinoage thriller starring the guy from Squid Game (took me a while to place him).  There's nothing wrong with it and it's probably better than the majority of Hollywood fare getting pumped out in the same genre.    BUT some of these films can get overly complex plotwise and sometimes I swear I need a freaking scorecard/primer to keep track of the plots/characters floating around in the film.

Lost Souls (2000)  I went in semi blind on this one.  And guess what, I enjoyed it.  Probably at the tail end of Winona Ryder's prime.  I always kind of liked her which helps.  Anyway, it seems like Hollywood released a bunch of religious/supernatural type style thrilers in 99 and 2000.  I think this one kind of gets lost unfortuanatley.  I enjoyed this one as a film more than Stigmata (which may be better made). One of the biggest pluses on this movie is the cinematography.  It looks like one of those gritty 70s films, except it's set in 2000.  It's a bit of a slow burner.  I did get a kick out of seeing audio cassette tapes still in vogue in the year 2000.  NYC is prominent/a character which is always good. I sort of liked the ending too.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB