You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#11191 Re: Guns N' Roses » Brain in Modern Drummer (May 2009) » 917 weeks ago

Watermarking is an infringement of copyright. Yeah, its illegal.

jarmo knows this. It's like the time George Chin told him to take his pictures off the website... Now I see he's blaming people for whining and telling them they aren't fans, while posters are calling he and Adz out for their hypocrisy and breaking their own rules of insulting board members. I see nothing has changed much over there. Is that ALL jarmo and Adz do now? How strange to be trolls on your own message board 16


One thing that popped out at me in this article is that we were all assuming that Scraped was the Brain song Dizzy was talking about called "Lies They Tell." But he said Scraped was a Buckethead song. Could this mean they are two totally different songs and we do have a name of a new song?

#11192 Re: Guns N' Roses » Brain in Modern Drummer (May 2009) » 917 weeks ago

I think there are probably a thousand different mixes of the songs. Like Axlin said, and MSL said, their could be an Acoustic Better mix out there, which the whoreders said there was.

#11193 Re: Guns N' Roses » Brain in Modern Drummer (May 2009) » 917 weeks ago

And a bonus re-mix would be killer. 22

That interview really does make me miss Buckethead, though.

#11194 Re: Guns N' Roses » Brain in Modern Drummer (May 2009) » 917 weeks ago

I was going to bitch about the watermarks (which can be viewed as infringement of the original copyright, btw) but James did it for me.

Man, these last few interviews from Tommy and Brain have been great. A really big window into the recording process. I wish they would have done this earlier, but I can kind of understand why they waited until after CD dropped.

It's funny, Axl comes off sooooo fucking good from these interviews and can come off so badly on his own.... This has a lot to do with who's conducting the interview. He really looks like a pretty awesome guy and bandmate from these interviews. Even when Tommy (who hit the nail right on the head) in his interview basically said Axl was a lot to blame for the wait and basically over doing (or over-producing) everything when left to his own devices.

#11195 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Possibility of a Guns N' Roses '09 Summer tour » 917 weeks ago

monkeychow wrote:
James Lofton wrote:

Really? An artist canceling 20% of its shows that fans bought tickets to has minor impact?

What i mean is....I think misterID said earlier that the band has lost its credibility due to cancelled shows and he specifically mentioned the 06 tour.

I felt that the 06 tour actually went part of the way to fix the peformance reputation damaged by the 02 tour - both in terms of image (Robin and Axl looking more traditional rock) and in terms of the cancellation rate (which was lower than previously).

But what i was trying to say is that I think when Axl cancels a show he looses fans and people think ge is an asshole. BUT I don't think it effects his credibility on the "this is or isn't GNR" factor for people. GNR has always had riots and cancells and problems...so if anything...Axl fucking up a tour actually makes it more credible that it's gnr 16

Perhaps we're talking about different things, I'm just saying - while i'm sure it costs them fans - cancelling a show isn't why people dont accept this as GNR. It might be why people call axl a prick. But it's not why they ask for reunions etc. I Think factors far more important to that are the loss of the old members, strange rearrangment of the old songs and solos, the massive wait for new material...those were the things causing credibility issues for the band. TBH I feel that if the AFD line up got back together there would still be cancelled shows. It's part of Axl's life it seems. It's annoying as hell...but it doesn't go towards what makes the band legitimate as GNR or not.

Nah, what I meant was that the cancelled shows added to the the deterioration of their cred not that it was the specific cause. The 06 tour did start to try and fix that image, but then it suffered the same fate as the last aborted tour. It didn't have anything to do with people thinking it was or wasn't GNR. But I also don't think it adds to the Axl Rose mystique either. Most people, I'd say, saw it as "The same old bullshit." and rolled their eyes and washed their hands of it. So it definitely effected their cred in that aspect because its going to push away the casual fan who isn't interested in what constitutes a Del James version of a "real rock show" which includes late starts and possible no shows and cancellations. That's not dangerous. It's just bullshit. Again, none of this goes to de-legitamize the newGNR. But I could see where someone would be giving the band a chance and then having to deal with Axl's touring bullshit ending up just saying "Fuck it."

#11196 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Possibility of a Guns N' Roses '09 Summer tour » 917 weeks ago

Neemo wrote:
misterID wrote:

And it didn't have to be loaded with sound. That's ridiculous. There's just so much going on with guitars that it is near IMPOSSIBLE to layer it all perfectly in the mixing process. That's why some of the unmixed demos come off better.

Again my point here is that its unfair to blame the shear amount of sounds on Ron, or any of the musician's, in the end it was Axl's baby and this is how he wanted it

Dude, I just said that like 2 posts before! cool16

Neemo wrote:
misterID wrote:

I know there's a school of thought that we're just attached to the demos and its our fault for listening to them. I can say I'd feel the same way if I didn't. But we did hear them. And they were better. I also prefer the 2001-02 live versions of Madagascar and The Blues and they sound nothing like the demos. And nothing I've heard studio wise has lived up to those live versions.

I'm not blaming anyone for listening to the demos and live cuts...i did so myself...i'm just of the opinion that if you listen to somethign continuously your brain starts to expect things to happen, when they dont it throws ya...one perfect example is the blues in Rio...how many peopel still say "OK Nevermind" in the middle 16 this happened to me back in the illusion days to, and to this day i prefer the Days of Thunder KOHD to the album cuz of the cut out lines...but otherwise the songs appears to be identical

I could really adapt to a new version of a song. If I really liked the changes. I just don't here.

Neemo wrote:
misterID wrote:

I think what James was talking about on IRS with Pittman is his work that's on the studio version, and you can barely make it out. Tommy's bass was killer on the IRS demos, especially on the 99 version.

so pitman was intitially drowned out...and now that its drowned out you are upset? 16 ok hmm As for Tommy, i was never really noticed his work on the demos we heard prior to the release...same with the final product...it still doesnt stand out much

As pointed out above, the real victim is Tommy. His bassline is what made CD cool, and you can't hear it over Ron. And his bass was heavy on the 99 demos of IRS and TWAT. Again, this all falls in Axl's lap.

If you listen real close to IRS you can hear the organ and some cool 'synth sounds--that weren't on the demos.'

#11197 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Possibility of a Guns N' Roses '09 Summer tour » 917 weeks ago

I have a problem with Scraped seeing how cut and pasted it is. That's a song Bob Ezrin could have done wonders for. But I can tell you right now I'd sill have problems with the songs I have a problem with now even if I had never heard the original demos. I know what I like and I know what I don't like. And it didn't have to be loaded with sound. That's ridiculous. There's just so much going on with guitars that it is near IMPOSSIBLE to layer it all perfectly in the mixing process. That's why some of the unmixed demos come off better.

I know there's a school of thought that we're just attached to the demos and its our fault for listening to them. I can say I'd feel the same way if I didn't. But we did hear them. And they were better. I also prefer the 2001-02 live versions of Madagascar and The Blues and they sound nothing like the demos. And nothing I've heard studio wise has lived up to those live versions.

I think what James was talking about on IRS with Pittman is his work that's on the studio version, and you can barely make it out. Tommy's bass was killer on the IRS demos, especially on the 99 version.

And I said Ron ruined the song CD. Not the album itself. I still love the album and think its very good, despite thinking there was a better version of it before.

#11198 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Possibility of a Guns N' Roses '09 Summer tour » 917 weeks ago

The truth is though, this band has not finished a tour since 1993. This new line up has NEVER finished a full tour.... And I agree, the 2006 tour was successful and better executed than 02, but they still didn't finish it and that's what looks bad on them.

There are a bunch of people here who like Bumble, too. You're not the only one, so don't feel you're alone smile

And while Bumble is a great guy, I don't see his contributions being that great to warrant a 4 year wait to tinker and finish up the album.

This is my opinion of course, but he ruined CD. He ruined The Blues. He's distracting on Prostitute. His solo was not that great to replace Bucket on Rhiad. There is so much going on with IRS because of him that he overpowers the song and you can barely make out some of the cool organ and keyboard parts, especially in the beginning... But that's not his fault, that's Axl's. I do like what he did for "If The World" and TWAT but his parts aren't that important to the album and there's nothing on there that makes me say, "Wow, now I see what Axl was waiting for all these years. Its exactly what the songs were missing!!"

I would kill to hear what Shackler's sounded like with just Buckethead.

#11199 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Possibility of a Guns N' Roses '09 Summer tour » 917 weeks ago

Not just losing fans, James, but opportunity as well. The 06 line up would have never been as big as the 02 would have been, but they had a chance to be pretty damn successful. But it was all fucked up. And that responsibility falls on one person, imo

Granted, I know I don't know everything that was involved with the band. And I'm sure the label did give them a hard time. And I'm sure RTB might have hurt the band, too. But it still falls on Axl's shoulders. From what we know the label supported Axl with money up to 2004. They tried to find him a producer. And despite what Axl said, he did have a great producer in Sean Beaven, who for still unexplained reasons was let go or walked away. Bob Ezrin was there for a time. We also know the album was in various stages of completion from 99 to 04. And all that was accomplished between 04-08 was Axl losing 2 of the most important members of the band in Robin and Buckethead, destroying their cred in the public eye even more by another aborted tour and lame cancelations, horrible interractions with the fanbase and the ridiculous continuation of tinkering of songs that only accomplished in creating bad cut and paste jobs and adding an outside guitarist to turn a potentially great album to just a good album. That sums up what the Axl waiting period has achieved.

The only bright spot in this whole mess was "If The World."

#11200 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Possibility of a Guns N' Roses '09 Summer tour » 917 weeks ago

My interest in GNR is up. Just not on the message boards. I've been listening to CD more and more lately. And I'm appreciating it a lot more.

But Bumble's "contributions" still piss me the fuck off 4

I'm sorry to be a hater, but fuck he just doesn't fit this band. GNR would totally have to reinvent itself for him to fit and center everything around his playing. I just don't see that happening. Especially when they're still a band centered around Buckethead and Robin's era.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB