You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1311 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 501 weeks ago

PaSnow wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:

What is up my homies! 

In this thread we are in a "safe place" where you cannot attack anyone.

buzzsaw wrote:

So you think it's okay to be a total douche bag as long as you're attacking a candidate?

Wow, didn't last 2 hours.  16

Who did I attack?  I asked a legitimate question. 

I've never said I didn't share responsibility for the old thread.  I played a role there too long after the thread disintigrated into what it was. This concept that it was my fault is just the little gang trying to hang on to some dignity.

#1312 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 501 weeks ago

So you think it's okay to be a total douche bag as long as you're attacking a candidate?   

No.  Because that leads to exactly what happened in the last thread. Nobody was interested in facts. Nobody was interested in addressing actual issues. That threat was a microcosm of the whole election. It was a joke and an embarrasment.  That whole thread was a pile of shit and if you allow the same garbage minus you can't call someone the dumbest motherfucker to ever discuss politics, it will be the same thread. I will bury them again minus swearing and there won't be a thing they can do about it.  How does that help anyone?

Only way to do it is to require sources for everything. Even then people will gripe about the source instead of the issue. There's a reason you don't discuss religion and politics with friends. People are losing real life friends over this...I certainly don't care if I offend some schmuck I don't even know here, nor do I care if they like me. Their respect means nothing to me.

#1313 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 501 weeks ago

You've got it backwards. I'm pretty sure I played nice for 150 pages or so.  I watched 3 or 4 people attack and gang up on anyone that disagreed with them for a long time without saying a word about it. At some point I had enough of it.

They have made no attempt to be civil in this whole thread. They bash the absolute fuck out of trump mercilessly. It's ugly and if they did that about a member of the band they would all have been banned already, but since it's trump it's perfectly fine. There's no attempt to be balanced, there's no mention of any of the numerous failures of Clinton. There's no attempt to have an actual discussion for 200+ pages. Anyone questions her at all and they all jump in to bury the person questioning her not by defending her but by attacking trump or the person. So they don't swear and that makes it okay or means they are being civil?  Bullshit.

#1314 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 502 weeks ago

Lock this up and never let them start another one. This will never get better.

#1315 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 502 weeks ago

mitchejw wrote:
buzzsaw wrote:

You're not giving facts asshat.  You're ignoring facts.  This is how you play, and this is how I've continued to shut you down to the point you were crying and weren't going to post anymore a month ago.  Nothing has changed as I've sat quiet.  You still spew bullshit as fact, you bully people that disagree with you, and you have this false narrative of how much you know about politics.  You don't know shit dude, because if you did, you'd be agreeing with my assessment.

Good day.

I was censored for using a mans words against him....but this ass hat can froth at the mouth and directly insult people with no consequence?

Wtf is going on here? Hypocrisy....

I was right. I called it exactly as it was. He's a crybaby. Can't handle when people come back at him.  Everything I said was absolutely correct and I stand by it.

#1316 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 502 weeks ago

misterID wrote:
polluxlm wrote:

Buzz & ID

I see you two lovebirds are at it again. Something got lost in translation the last time we did this?

You can both take the weekend off. Buzz for calling people names, and ID for egging him on.

Lovebirds, interesting. You need to step down as a mod. I didn't break the rules. James said stopped insulting people pages ago, buzz said he wouldn't stop, actually said for you to ban him. But you allowed him to act like this, he's insulted nearly everyone in this thread.  But you did call out Mitch in this thread, and the reason wasn't subtle. And funny enough, buzz gets banned when bad mouthed Trump. Every post buzz made was filled with insults. Every. Single. Post. I reacted and got banned.

You need to lose your mod privlages because you abused it. Step down.

I insulted only those that deserved it. They should have banned you simply for the lack of intelligence of your posts. Before you get you panties in a bunch again,  I'm insulting your posts, not you, so have a great night.

#1317 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 502 weeks ago

There's no way to be civil with idiots that enjoy ganging up on people that have the nerve to disagree with them. Frankly you should lock this thread. 200+ pages that I have posted very little in and the children can't handle it. Not one single positive thing has come from this immature bashing of trump and anyone that won't back Hillary.

#1318 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 502 weeks ago

You're not giving facts asshat.  You're ignoring facts.  This is how you play, and this is how I've continued to shut you down to the point you were crying and weren't going to post anymore a month ago.  Nothing has changed as I've sat quiet.  You still spew bullshit as fact, you bully people that disagree with you, and you have this false narrative of how much you know about politics.  You don't know shit dude, because if you did, you'd be agreeing with my assessment.

Good day.

#1319 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 502 weeks ago

No douchbag, it's who is pulling the strings of your puppet that scares me.  It's you that needs to do some homework.  A lot of it actually.  You are one of the dumbest motherfuckers I have ever met when it comes to politics.

#1320 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 502 weeks ago

Cramer wrote:
buzzsaw wrote:

Because 200+ pages shows none of you are interested at all in anything other than trump sucks.  You repeat the same garbage over and over and gang up on anyone that dares to disagree. I completely get disliking trump. I do.  BUT if you're blasting him and following that with nothing about how bad Hillary is, you're just not interested in an honest discussion about the state of things. Why should I waste my time and energy on that?  Because you want me to?  No thanks.

Nobody here is under any obligation to present a balanced argument for you. You're welcome to use that as a dodge, but don't expect anybody to go along with it.

That said, plenty of left leaning posters have pointed out their grievances with Clinton.

Equating the two however is false equivalency. They are not even remotely the same.

You're immediate reaction to the USA Today article was to dismiss it and claim it was an establishment pushing back against and outsider. It appears you are a Trump apologist more than anything.

Trump is one of the most dangerous men to have ever run for POTUS in my lifetime. This is no exaggeration. The idea of him in the Oval Office is terrifying to many. Nobody is "repeating the same garbage" especially since he does something new almost every day. He leaves us with a never ending stream of antics to be concerned about.

Your ignorance is showing.  I don't support Trump, nor am I voting for him.  I don't condone what he says or does. 

You have no idea how terrifying the thought of Clinton in the White House is.  Anyone that claims it's terrifying is automatically dismissed.  Trump may be the worst man to run for POTUS in your lifetime.  She is the worst PERSON to run for President in my lifetime.  She's in the pockets of the establishment and says whatever she needs to say to get elected knowing she's lying her ass off.  All the shit you can say about Trump you can say about her except she's more guarded about running her mouth publicly.  That's it.  Privately she's proven she's just as cunning and manipulative as anyone out there.  She was anti-gay marriage until she realized there was a political advantage to be gained.  She has no respect for herself, much less other women based on decisions she's made in her personal life.  She failed miserably in Benghazi and has next to no accomplishments in foreign affairs herself.  She's a power hungry person that is only consumed by getting more power.  You guys mean nothing to her.  She's not looking out for you at all.

But all of that is okay because she's not Trump.  That's literally what you guys say.  We all know why it's all you say too...there is nothing going for her.  More failed policies.  More spending passed on to future generations.  You guys amaze me.  Fuck Gary Johnson because he personally doesn't have enough foreign policy knowledge or thinks that climate change is being way overblown for profit by the Dems, but you have no issue with Clinton's foreign failure or kicking the spending can down the road to those future generations Johnson thinks will get swallowed by the sun.  At the rate we're spending, they might be better off if the sun swallows the earth than dealing with the financial burden you guys are more then happy to dump on them.  He's a fucking idiot for "trying to ruin their future", but you guys burying them financially is a-ok. 

So no, you're under no obligation to be balanced, but you have to understand that is why nobody listens to you guys but yourselves.  It's pointless.  You're so clueless about everything and there's no way in the world to have any respect for anything you say when you're so one-sided.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB