The states that are solidly blue have built up a strong firewall for any Democratic candidate. That's why I said months ago she's got 240+ walking in the door.

Check out this scenario.

I gave Trump all the toss up states: FL, OH, NC, NV, IA and AZ.

Now IMO there is no way he's going to pick these all up. But even if he did, he's still short. The only way for him to win is to breach one of the democratic stronghold states (WI, MI, PA, VA, CO etc) and THEN pick up all those swings.

What are the odds of him doing that?

This poll is rigged!

haha, now you suddenly like polls again? I thought they were all "skewed"?

College of William and Mary  is "making up" this exit poll? Ummm, OK. roll

What's that even mean? Early voting is democratic.

I remember guys like you in 2012, before Obama kicked your ass and put the baby to bed before 11 PM. SAD!

If I had to choose between a data collection agency paired with a highly rated American college, or some guy off the internet who thinks he's a genius...guess who I'd tend to believe?

And this should be pointed out to you guys, since you're bad at math and don't like data: Hillary can lose Florida and Ohio and still beat Trump.

Even nutty right wing "Newsmax" is reporting this today:

Also noted in this early voter exit polling is that these same Republicans voted GOP down ticket, just not for POTUS.

How  many accusers must come forward before it means something? A dozen women are all making this up? These claims paired with that tape make it quite easy to believe these women. I guess if a woman is ugly in your eyes that negates her story? Yikes.

I don't know what to make of the underage Trump rape allegations, I haven't read much about it, however that doesn't mean Americans won't arrive at their own conclusions. It's out in the open, there will be more, it will continue. If he becomes president, it's not going to go away. That's my point. None of this will go away, no matter who is POTUS.

Despite what you righties may claim, I am not a Clinton apologist. I rarely speak about her and spend the majority of my time criticizing the tangerine dream of the Alt Right. She was not my first choice by any means. She wasn't in 2008 and she's not in 2016.

I've said this plenty of times, but you're not welcome to define my silence. Buzz expects "fairness" and "balance" in this topic, sorry but that's not how it works. I spend my time blasting Trump because I find him repugnant on many levels.

What do I believe about Clinton? That she's made lazy/arrogant mistakes, none of which were malicious in nature. The majority I suspect were born from secrecy (which is what happens when you have a political party up your ass with a magnifying glass for three decades, hardly a surprise.) What do I know? I know that no criminal charges were brought against this woman...again. I've also pointed out several times in this thread that the same group who spends millions to prosecute her, always end up exonerating her. Why do they fail so miserably? It's certainly not from a lack of trying, but from a lack of evidence.

The boy who cried wolf comes to mind often with the Republican party. There are valid complaints and issues buried underneath decades of rumors, lies, loose innuendos and conspiracy theories. But the crazies of your party drown out any legitimate grievances the potty trained Republicans may have. She should be held accountable for any misdeeds, but the GOP spend more time attacking a caricature of Clinton and whipping their base into a frenzy instead.

Let's not forget you voted for her too. We both came to that conclusion because we understand the choice we have here. It's the adult thing to do. You may be more vocal in your criticism, but that does not mean I am without my own complaints.