Really, an ignore feature would be great. Really great discussions devolve into stupidity. I don't want to see Mitch banned but I don't want to see his posts.

mitchejw wrote:

Smoking Guns wrote:

Kamala is such a raging bitch.

hmmm,  seems you like it when Trump is a bitch but you hate it when Kamala is a bitch. What could possibly explain it into the system? Why is it OK in one context but not the other? Will have to think on that one won’t we?

Is it possible that you were judging people unfairly? Is it possible that you’re not being consistent in your evaluation?

One of the cool things about not being a bleeding heart liberal is that you don't really care about petty things.  While most conservatives would prefer Trump to choose his words a little more wisely, they don't really have an issue with the message being delivered bluntly.  Frankly the message needs to be delivered even more bluntly, but certainly a little more eloquently in an ideal world.

Liberals on the other hand are a bit sensitive.  They need safe spaces where nobody is going to speak bluntly to them or tell them the truths that need to be said.  So while Trump can get away with being a "bitch" as you call it, Kamala can't.  Not because she's a woman or because she's not white as snow, but because the bleeding heart liberals don't like it.  They don't embrace toughness.

SG isn't judging people unfairly; he's acknowledging the playing field isn't the same.  You have never understood any of the differences that exist on both sides...you're too busy labeling everyone racist or sexist to even begin to comprehend any other options.  These things that make us different are actually the best thing we have going for us as a nation.  Too much of either side is bad; balance is needed because we can't survive being too liberal or conservative.  Either option would destroy the fabric of the country.