Federal Judge Ronnie Abrams has ordered a December status conference hearing after a woman, who calls herself “Jane Doe,” filed a lawsuit claiming that Trump raped her when she was 13 years old in the 1990s. This is the third attempt the plaintiff has made in filing this particular lawsuit. Last Friday, she filed an amended complaint, with a new “witness” named “Joan Doe.” The plaintiff and witnesses in the case are using pseudonyms, they say, to protect their identities.

“In the 1994-95 school year, I was told by the plaintiff in Jane Doe v. Trump and Epstein (1:16-cv-04642, SDNY) that the plaintiff was subject to sexual contact by the Defendants at parties in New York City during the summer of 1994,” one of the witnesses said in a declaration.

The complaint alleges billionaire convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein had a woman pickup teenage girls for his famous parties. One of these girls was “Jane.” Another witness, “Tiffany,” who also provided an affidavit in the lawsuit, said she witnessed Trump and Epstein rape the plaintiff several times. Trump has repeatedly denied the allegations.

“As I have said before, the allegations are categorically untrue and an obvious publicity stunt aimed at smearing my client,” Alan Garten, Trump’s attorney, told LawNewz.com last week, “In the event we are actually served this time, we intend to move for sanctions for this frivolous filing.”

Judge Abrams (who also happens to be the sister of LawNewz.com founder Dan Abrams) has called for a status conference hearing on December 16, 2016 at 11:30 am at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. She’s asked for both sides to provide information that could assist the Court in advancing the case to settlement or trial.

Her order is embedded below.

Alberto Luperon contributed to this report.

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal … suit-case/

Nobody cares what you want. Too bad!

Nobody here owes you anything, and certainly not that.

Edit: and the reality is that you don't want fair, you want your version of fair.

His birther non-sense alone is easily classified under "Racist asshole"

You're welcome to redefine his words I guess, but anytime somebody makes sweeping claims about an entire race of people that would be prejudice. Do you understand that concept?

Trump also settled a lawsuit for refusing to rent to blacks. There was overwhelming evidence against him on this. In fact he was sued not once, but twice.

He was also sued by the NJ casino commission for taking black people off the floor, and/or moving them to the back.

He claimed the judge was against him because he was Mexican.

See...it's you who drag this thread down with your nasty tone. As I said, you're the problem with this thread (and the previous one)

And again, what's the obsession with controlling what others say? Users are welcome to say whatever they want about Trump, we don't need clearance or approval from you. Trump is a racist and so are a majority of his voters. Does this offend you? The truth often does, but too bad.

Quit demanding a balanced argument. Nobody here is obligated to you in anyway shape or form. Why can't you understand this?

Can you guys ever just admit your guy is a racist POS? Must everything pivot back to Hillary? Take ownership of it. (yea yea, we know he's not your candidate, even though you defend him every chance you have.)

Byrd said that his participation in the KKK was the "greatest mistake of his life" and has moved on. I guess other people can not. Owning up to your mistakes, growing as a human being, and asking others to forgive you is a sign of an adult.

Trump is a racist, and I will call him out as such. Hillary is not.