Really?  You face higher credibility and standards?  You just admitted yesterday you’re a conspiracy theorist.

My earlier comment was your reading of Mueller’s letter. How you inject things that aren’t there, and your complete ignoring of the WaPo article that preceded all this.

Mueller’s letter stated he thought more context was needed. In a phone call, he expressed his concern was due to the way the media was representing his obstruction findings.

1.) can we assume your POV on obstruction is indicative of the media at large or the Democrats comments in the hearing today?

If we can’t, how would you define the media’s portrayal of obstruction in the days following Barr’s original summary? Again, we’re talking about the media at large.

2.) Mueller said nothing in Barr’s letter was inaccurate, and refused the opportunity to proof read it/approve it/opine.

3.) Mueller didn’t make a determination on obstruction. Something that apparently surprised the DoJ.

4.) Mueller’s lack of a recommendation and the AG’s decision not to indict don’t preclude Congress from exercising their constitutional authority to impeach.

So I’m going to do some basic logic here. Tell me what I got wrong.

PaSnow’s opinion on obstruction = media narrative, or A=B

Mueller stated he didn’t like the confusion created by the media (which based in part their coverage on Barr’s letter), or B?C.

So A?C, or PaSnow’s interpretation isn’t equal to Mueller’s concerns.

3 months ago, Mueller was the defender of our institutions. He said no collusion happened, negating 2 years of Democratic fantasies. So now the left is calling Rosenstein a stooge and compromised.

I have a hunch when Mueller testifies in a few weeks and supports his argument the DoJ lacks the evidence to prosecute (the same decision none of you expressed outrage with when Comey exonerated Clinton), he’ll be called a stooge  too.

No one is attacking your credibility. I’m just saying you’re incapable of objectively looking at any piece of evidence. Again, if Mitch is cheering you on, you’re probably not on the side of informed discussion.

Edit:  fuck, the forum converts an equal sign with a slash through it to a question mark

From the WaPo article:

"In that call, Mueller said he was concerned that media coverage of the obstruction probe was misguided and creating public misunderstandings about the office’s work, according to Justice Department officials. Mueller did not express similar concerns about the public discussion of the investigation of Russia’s election interference, the officials said. Barr has testified previously that he did not know whether Mueller supported his conclusion on obstruction.

When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr’s memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not but felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said."

Might be because you're reading tidbits from CNN. 

But I'll give you the Flagg breakdown.

Republicans making allusions to how Clinton paid a foreign government to create the Steele Dossier and the improper conduct of the Trump hostile agents who started the investigation.  Barr saying he's looking into it and will release his findings.

Democrats trying to establish Obstruction of Justice and Barr repeatedly telling them their allegations aren't illegal and wouldn't meet the legal standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.

Mitch isn’t capable of coherent thought or a logical argument. The guy literally can’t read.

I’m sure he has a well thought out argument of why Trump is harming illegal immigrants, what an alternative is, and what we can do to further deter more people from flooding our system. Over 100k illegals rushing the border each month cause our system is broken, is a totally manufactured crisis.

Mitch definitely has a solution that applies to the current laws his party helped pass. I’m sure he has something intelligent for us.

Yea, linking this post is in no way calling me a chubby maga wearing beta male, the same insult Jason has worn out for 2 years.

Doesn’t matter who I voted for in 2016 or how many times I say Trump makes me sick. Just because I’m on team Mueller means I’m a Trump apologist.