You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1611 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 369 weeks ago

To all those who don’t suffer a lack of  basic reading comprehension skills, it’s over. Trump is vindicated. The democrats couldn’t get the votes to impeach if they wanted to. What a fucking farce.

#1612 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 369 weeks ago

Translation:  Fuck the rule of law and standards that have been in place for decades. It doesn’t matter if not a single American colluded with Russia and countless government officials now look like assholes selling book deals. It doesn’t matter that countless citizens spread lies and a bonafide conspiracy.

Trump must be stopped at any cost!  Don’t break my fantasies! Yes, collusion and the basis for the Mueller investigation were all a lie, but Trump should have never taken any action as the chief executive to defend himself from what we now know were despicable lies and falsehoods.

No logic, no reason. Just raw passion. It doesn’t matter what happened under Obama or how Clinton actually obstructed justice by destroying evidence under subpoena. Because we’re not a nation of laws. We’re a nation of uninformed idiots who can’t read an indictment let alone a news article.

And 19 months from now when Trump wins re-election, we’ll bitch and moan and fabricate more corruption to handwaive our own horrible behavior and that of the politicians we support.

#1613 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 369 weeks ago

PaSnow wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
PaSnow wrote:

Took me :30 seconds moron!

_________________________________________________________________________________

4.

ROGER JASON STONE, JR. was a political consultant who worked for decades in U.S.

politics and on U.S. political campaigns. STONE was an official on the U.S. presidential campaign
of Donald J. Trump (“Trump Campaign”) until in or around August 2015, and maintained regular
contact with and publicly supported the Trump Campaign through the 2016 election.
5.

During the summer of 2016, STONE spoke to senior Trump Campaign officials about

Organization 1 and information it might have had that would be damaging to the Clinton
Campaign. STONE was contacted by senior Trump Campaign officials to inquire about future
releases by Organization 1.

6.

By in or around early August 2016, STONE was claiming both publicly and privately to

have communicated with Organization 1. By in or around mid-August 2016, Organization 1 made
a public statement denying direct communication with STONE. Thereafter, STONE said that his
communication with Organization 1 had occurred through a person STONE described as a “mutual
friend,” “go-between,” and “intermediary.” STONE also continued to communicate with members
of the Trump Campaign about Organization 1 and its intended future releases.

____________________________________________________________________________

It's on page 2 of the indictment, so hard to find & buried in the finer details (NOT!)


Like I said, not a fucking clue. What is he indicted for?  It ain’t Wikileaks. You peddled your conspiracy bullshit for 2 years and consistently get basic facts wrong (like this one).

He’s not on trial for “working with Wikileaks”. The indictment clearly makes the case he’s in trouble for lying about his involvement (process crimes). You don’t have a clue, you’re entering Jason and Mitch territory, and even when Mueller, Rosenstein and Barr tell you you’re wrong, you don’t give up. But call me a moron. I’m not the one who clearly can’t read and refuses to acknowledge they were part of a conspiracy and smear far worse than birtherism.

Read the fucking indictment and connect it back to your claim.

It’s in plain language on page 10. You’re embarrassing yourself.

Are you fucking stupid dude? I barely research this stuff & prove you wrong.

Organization 1 is widely believed to be WikiLeaks, which published a huge trove of stolen communications related to the Clinton campaign during the 2016 election.

https://www.businessinsider.com/roger-s … nts-2019-1

Are you daft. Talking to Wikileaks isn’t a crime. He’s not indicted for talking to Wikileaks. You clearly can’t read. They explain the charges, talking to Wikileaks isn’t one of them.  Call me all the names you want, but you clearly don’t have a clue what you’re talking about.  What crimes is Stone accused of?

You don’t even know. You’ve embarrassed yourself for the past 2 years talking about collusion and jail time and are losing your mind because your fantasy was just shattered. 

I genuinely feel sorry for you if you think you’re informed on this and are stating factual information. It’s sad your this off the rails.

It’s in your own fucking article. Bullet #2. Nothing about Wikileaks. C’mon dude. Don’t fucking insult me because you refuse to acknowledge your claims are total fabrications.

#1614 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 369 weeks ago

PaSnow wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
PaSnow wrote:

I beleive he stated it's not illegal to publish stolen documents (journalism). It is illegal to work with the purveyors of stolen documents. Stone worked with & corraborated with them to ensure their release. Hence, he's on trial.


That’s not why he’s on trial. Not at all. This is exactly what I mean. What you’re saying is objectively false.  You can read the indictments. It’s public. Yet you choose to remain ignorant and repeat this absolute falsehood. Link the article showing Stone is on trial for working with Wikileaks.

Took me :30 seconds moron!

_________________________________________________________________________________

4.

ROGER JASON STONE, JR. was a political consultant who worked for decades in U.S.

politics and on U.S. political campaigns. STONE was an official on the U.S. presidential campaign
of Donald J. Trump (“Trump Campaign”) until in or around August 2015, and maintained regular
contact with and publicly supported the Trump Campaign through the 2016 election.
5.

During the summer of 2016, STONE spoke to senior Trump Campaign officials about

Organization 1 and information it might have had that would be damaging to the Clinton
Campaign. STONE was contacted by senior Trump Campaign officials to inquire about future
releases by Organization 1.

6.

By in or around early August 2016, STONE was claiming both publicly and privately to

have communicated with Organization 1. By in or around mid-August 2016, Organization 1 made
a public statement denying direct communication with STONE. Thereafter, STONE said that his
communication with Organization 1 had occurred through a person STONE described as a “mutual
friend,” “go-between,” and “intermediary.” STONE also continued to communicate with members
of the Trump Campaign about Organization 1 and its intended future releases.

____________________________________________________________________________

It's on page 2 of the indictment, so hard to find & buried in the finer details (NOT!)


Like I said, not a fucking clue. What is he indicted for?  It ain’t Wikileaks. You peddled your conspiracy bullshit for 2 years and consistently get basic facts wrong (like this one).

He’s not on trial for “working with Wikileaks”. The indictment clearly makes the case he’s in trouble for lying about his involvement (process crimes). You don’t have a clue, you’re entering Jason and Mitch territory, and even when Mueller, Rosenstein and Barr tell you you’re wrong, you don’t give up. But call me a moron. I’m not the one who clearly can’t read and refuses to acknowledge they were part of a conspiracy and smear far worse than birtherism.

Read the fucking indictment and connect it back to your claim.

It’s in plain language on page 10. You’re embarrassing yourself.

#1615 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 369 weeks ago

PaSnow wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
PaSnow wrote:

He's full of sh!t. He said 'No one in the Trump campaign or on the peripheral" worked with Russia & Wikileaks in the release of the leaks. How about Roger Stone!!


No, your conspiracy about Stone is just wrong. Stone had nothing to do with the release from Wikileaks. You’d know that if you attempted to pay attention. Being told a release is coming isn’t working with them. Or is every journalist who breaks a story working with someone?

I beleive he stated it's not illegal to publish stolen documents (journalism). It is illegal to work with the purveyors of stolen documents. Stone worked with & corraborated with them to ensure their release. Hence, he's on trial.


That’s not why he’s on trial. Not at all. This is exactly what I mean. What you’re saying is objectively false.  You can read the indictments. It’s public. Yet you choose to remain ignorant and repeat this absolute falsehood. Link the article showing Stone is on trial for working with Wikileaks.

#1616 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 369 weeks ago

PaSnow wrote:

He's full of sh!t. He said 'No one in the Trump campaign or on the peripheral" worked with Russia & Wikileaks in the release of the leaks. How about Roger Stone!!


No, your conspiracy about Stone is just wrong. Stone had nothing to do with the release from Wikileaks. You’d know that if you attempted to pay attention. Being told a release is coming isn’t working with them. Or is every journalist who breaks a story working with someone?

#1617 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 369 weeks ago

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/na … 7da05e99f2

Lightly redacted. But let’s all predict the worst and continue to be ignorant and celebrate it.

Or even better...let’s not even read it and claim total exoneration.


Are you fucking for real?  You’re the most ignorant and uninformed person on this site. Literally nothing you say is accurate and you clearly suffer from an inability at basic reading comprehension. I legitimately think you have a learning disability.

You won’t read the fucking Mueller report or any credible news article on it, and continue to spout your nonsense. You’re a fucking retard and a bad person.

#1618 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 369 weeks ago

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/na … 7da05e99f2

Lightly redacted. But let’s all predict the worst and continue to be ignorant and celebrate it.

#1619 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 369 weeks ago

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:
mitchejw wrote:

Retards? Takes one to know know one RF.

Let me ask you something...do you ever get tired of not caring? You must a real sweet benefits package for that ‘knee injury’ to never care about anything.

Next time i need the opinion of someone who does absolutely no homework on the subject matter I’ll give you a buzz.

Say it out loud, “i don’t care about the truth.”



I see you and Jason are attacking my military service again.  Cool, I really care what a 9/11 truther who threatens to sue everyone and makes up lies about threats to their person, and a complete fucking idiot think about me.  How will I survive?

Oh you’ll survive off that sweet disability check and SS that i pay into every month.

I don't get SSI you fucking retard.  Once again, go fuck yourself.

#1620 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 369 weeks ago

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

I sense all the Russian Truthers losing their minds tomorrow at 9:30 as their conspiracy is shattered. Rather than admit they were duped by a bunch of morons and dishonest people, they’ll create more conspiracies. Then they’ll attack the intelligence and patriotism of anyone who lacks their religious devotion to said conspiracies. When confronted with their factual inaccuracies, they’ll launch personal insults and continue to spread dishonest accusations that demonstrate they haven’t read a single document that didn’t appear on a blog.

Any takers?

Oh, and Mitch will continue to embarrass himself by posting nonsense. Like saying there’s more evidence that Trump colluded than that he was “spied” on.  God must love retards cause there’s plenty of them.

Retards? Takes one to know know one RF.

Let me ask you something...do you ever get tired of not caring? You must a real sweet benefits package for that ‘knee injury’ to never care about anything.

Next time i need the opinion of someone who does absolutely no homework on the subject matter I’ll give you a buzz.

Say it out loud, “i don’t care about the truth.”


I see you and Jason are attacking my military service again.  Cool, I really care what a 9/11 truther who threatens to sue everyone and makes up lies about threats to their person, and a complete fucking idiot think about me.  How will I survive?

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB