You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#16541 Re: Guns N' Roses » so stoked for chinese democracy! » 938 weeks ago

Very cool man. Hope it kicks ass.

#16543 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR Myspace Updates » 938 weeks ago

A better question is why are they trading off average musicians to begin with?

#16544 Re: Guns N' Roses » Izzy » 938 weeks ago

The Izzy talk was getting boring. Read back through the pages. It's got a 99% chance of being bullshit.

The Bullshit-O-Meter broke when the dude went all "I know a guy, who knows Izzy's housekeeper, who said he's rejoining his old band".

MyGNR deal with that kind of stuff daily.

#16545 Re: Guns N' Roses » Izzy » 938 weeks ago

Definitely. Axl should've just trust in Bucket & Mother Goose. Seriously. Those guys know what the fuck they are doing, he should've just let them go hog wild on instrumentals, Axl pinned lyrics and contributed some of his Freddie Mercury/Elton John-inspired ballads to it, and you would've had a legendary album in two years - tops.

#16546 Re: Guns N' Roses » Izzy » 938 weeks ago

And exactly what Shaq said, is the reason CD has some issues.

If Axl would've just let a raw band record the album - Axl, Bucket, Robin, Paul, Tommy, Brain, Dizzy & Chris... and just left that material OR when he re-recorded, had those same people involved, it would've came out more fluid to judge solos, technical ability, the layers of the album, etc.

But by having everyone, other than maybe Beta, on the album, it deluded the watering hole with too many people swimming in it.

I hope that new albums are on the way, AND they have solid contributors to them as a band effort. People bashed Oh My God for being Axl and a bunch of session musicians, and ironically, nearly 10 years later - that's exactly what haunted CD. The same exact thing.

I hope the next album has a straight lineup, whether a new variation, or a reunion.

#16548 Re: Guns N' Roses » (OLD NEWS!)The Limewire Leaks Discussion » 938 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:

Its now being sold in Michigan. Which means its potentially being sold elsewhere in the US as well. On Monday I'm gonna head to Best Buy and this record store in my area to see if I can buy a copy.

If any potential leakers want any glory, the time is quickly running out. Everyone knows now that you can go to one of these stores and get it. Had I known US stores were willing to hand out copies before release, I would have went earlier this week. I might go tomorrow after football, depending on how intoxicated I am.

GO INTOXICATED


That's Guns N' Fuckin' Roses all the way!


9

#16549 Re: Guns N' Roses » Izzy » 938 weeks ago

Axl is irreplaceable. Slash is not.

Period.


Just look at the Bucket arguments people have. Why? Because for the first time since Izzy, GN'R has a guitarist, they simply cannot be replaced on any level. He's one of a kind. He brings a uniqueness to the material. Izzy was never replaced after '91. Bucket, thankfully his work is still on CD, was never replaced since 2004. And i'm not talking about Ron. He's talented as hell. But watch those 2001-02 shows with Bucket. Bucket carries Robin's ass on almost every show. Ron stood apart from Robin in 2006-07, but that Bucket contribution still felt missing.

If you were to have a lineup of...

GN'R
Axl
Bucket
Bumble
Izzy
Tommy
Brain
Dizzy
Chris

That'd probably be the most talent the GN'R name has ever seen.

#16550 Re: Guns N' Roses » Izzy » 938 weeks ago

Mikkamakka wrote:

Hollywood Rose wasn't that great. Without Slash, AFD would have been a bulk of Anything Goes and Think About Yous, with no Jungle, no SCOM, no PC, no Brownstone etc. Axl, Slash, Duff and Izzy are all essentials. I'd like to add Steven, but he'll never be able to do a tour or record an album.

No they're not. CD is released in a week.


Seriously, you old Gunners need to re-read the memo, then read it again. Only Axl is an essential. Now if you believe that GN'R died in 1993, that's your personal belief.

But in reality, GN'R went on (in a limited fashion) with Axl & Dizzy teamed with a whole new group of guys.

Axl will get sponsors, label support, management, and at least 2/3 recognition as - Guns N' Roses.

I know you believe, what we all believe, that GN'R was Axl, Slash, Duff & Izzy... but in Axl's mind - he's GN'R.

GN'R = NIN

Axl = Trent

He's the only non-replaceable member of the band. I can honestly say that if Axl died, and left the GN'R name to Izzy in his will, then Izzy teamed up with Slash, Duff, Matt & Dizzy, and hired a new lead singer, called it Guns N' Roses.... I would NOT go see it. 'Cause it ain't GN'R without Ax.

Axl is traveling around on the name, that Axl, SLASH, DUFF, IZZY & STEVEN built. Funny, nobody had these issues when Steven was fired. When Izzy left. I didn't see any "it ain't GN'R without Popcorn" signs.

CD, an album over a decade in the making, is being released in a week. Slash & Duff should've just STAYED. They had no reason to leave. They had equal shares (no ownership tho) in profits. If they'd just done their thing, shut the fuck up and let Axl do his, sat back and recorded and collaborated on Axl's time table, they could've done ALL THEIR SHIT, solo work, VR, all that shit... and STILL been apart of GN'R.

They - fucked - up

'Cause now, when their solo careers are going downhill and VR is dead... Axl will still have GN'R. He'll survive.

They burnt bridges for no reason in the long run, except an estranged friendship and a loss of money. Smooth...

Axl is the essential. I wouldn't have said that, if it weren't for the fact that Axl turned around and REPLACED THEM with more talented and capable musicians (Bucket, Ron, Tommy, Brain).

In 15 years, even if a reunion is around the corner, Axl proved himself the victor. And if that reunion happens, the slightest slip, the least little bit of them getting out of line - bucket

22

shotgunblues1978 wrote:
nugdafied wrote:
Axlin08 wrote:

VR is the only project that Slash got a platinum album

It's Five O'Clock Somewhere & Contraband both went platinum.

21

Neither Snakepit album even sniffed platinum

Slash claims it went platinum on his website, but it never even went gold according to the RIAA.  I think I'll side with the RIAA in this argument

The thing opened at #70 on the Billboard albums charts and never climbed.  So people should put this nonsense to bed right now.  The album didn't even come close to platinum regardless of what Slash says

I knew 5:00 going platinum, sounded weird. No way that drink coaster went platinum.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB