You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1711 Re: The Garden » Thinking of giving up Netflix » 383 weeks ago
For a while. It's just be blehhh lately. Original shows mostly suck, only a few good movies I could probably rent on Redbox. Anyone recommend either Showtime or HBO?
(Admittedly not a Game Of Thrones fan, but myb I could watch older series esp Boardwalk Empire). Also not too into MMA or boxing, how are the movies selection on either of these? Any insights appreciated.
I have both and recommend them both. Far too many amazing shows on each channel you’d enjoy. Give Billions on Showtime a watch. Ray Donovan and Homeland are also excellent, and I enjoy Shameless as well.
HBO hasn’t made a series I disliked, so you can’t go wrong. But Curb Your Enthusiam and Veep are excellent comedies. Westworld is absolutely beautiful.
Have you tried getting into FX or AMC shows? I find many of those to be as good as their premium counterparts.
#1712 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 383 weeks ago
Russian lawyer who infamously attended the "Russian Adoption Meeting" (lol, good one Hope Hicks, Real clever coverup you genius you) indicted for Obstruction. Seems it dates back to 2014-2015ish, a Russian Tax fraud of laundering Russian Tax money into the US (NY real estate). Might connect how her & the Trumps were long associates tho, and how she was an operative who reported back to Russian officials with Trumpian requests.
No Collusion tho, no collusion.
She's out of the country so will never face trial or charges. The timing of it being released today is curious. Almost like NY Prosecutors had this one sitting around since she'll never goto court so decided "Mehhh, let's drop this one now"
Didn’t you swear Trump would be impeached and out of office by 12/31?
I’m genuinely asking what it will take for you to drop the collusion shit? It’s painfully apparent your opinion isn’t based on fact. The articles out there go to great lengths to state that her crime is in no way related to Trump, the Tower meeting, or the election.
Yet you completely ignore that and inject your own conspiracy theories. That’s all you and the other 3 have done for months.
So it’s clear evidence to support your opinions isn’t necessary. Even if the article you quote tells you that you’re wrong, you ignore it.
Is there any pathway where you acknowledge you were duped, you spoke in error, and were no different than Alex Jones and the people who support him? Are you going to go full SLC on us and start linking to infowars?
Is your life so bad that the only happiness you find is derived from this fantasy?
I understand why the other two post this nonsense. They obviously don’t know any better. But I thought you and BigBri different.
#1713 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 383 weeks ago
#1714 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 384 weeks ago
mitchejw wrote:Smoking Guns wrote:Oh my goodyyou Debbie downers. Market up today due to strong Jobs numbers. Lol. You can’t look each day and determine the fate of our economy.
This sounds like a direct quote from Trump himself- incomprehensible and mostly a pile of words
312,000 jobs added. 176,000 was the forecast. 3.2% wage increases. PA Snow said we were in a recession. Lol
Dude, you’re arguing with people who just a week ago were pushing a debunked conspiracy that Cohen was in Prague. Nothing you say is going to change their mind, and they’re not having a discussion in good faith.
Save yourself the effort and irritation and ignore them.
#1715 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 390 weeks ago
Lol. Stupid Ivanka used her personal email often to discuss WH business. Lock Her Up!!
https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/11/19/politi … 2F%2Fwww.c
I guarantee you this barely becomes a story because something even more stupid happens tomorrow.
I had to chime in from my self imposed hiatus to remind you (and me) how obviously shitty and partisan CNN has become. Not a single mention that the entire Hillary thing was predicated on storing classified information and deleting 30k emails. Not a single mention of that by CNN (or you). It really is a fucking farce at this point. Read the original WaPo article. CNN is nothing but a progressive Breitbart clone.
Happy thanksgiving everyone. Hope you all have a great time with family or friends.
See you guys after Christmas.
#1716 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 393 weeks ago
Deleted
#1717 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 393 weeks ago
Deleted
#1718 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 393 weeks ago
Yep...i don’t make any sense...I’m not consistent....but here you are not following through on an argument.
Yep...I’m all over the place...my arguments can’t be comprehended...
You had 2 days and said/did nothing.
You’re just a shit stirrer.
No, Mitch. I'm just ignoring you. Because you embarrassed yourself, as you tend to do. You came in here with some numbers that completely disproved your own point. You tried to argue with Buzz, and then you tried to claim we were all wrong about statistical significance, and that swings of 300k voters wasn't a big deal.
You're no longer interesting to me, so I'm not going to waste my time responding to you when the end result will be you screaming "Fuck Trump" and telling us how unhinged and unhappy you are.
#1719 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 393 weeks ago
Mitch, the textbook definition of statistical significance is 5%.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statist … prov=sfti1
And that figure can be significantly lowered depending on the study. But let’s use the 5% standard. In many of the states you cited, they had a 5% or greater change from 2012. End of discussion.
Something like 35 people were killed by an assault rifle in 2017 out of 11,000 firearm homicides. 5 or 6 black men were shot and killed by police (to say nothing of the justification) and made the news out of 5,500 black men murdered in 2017.
#1720 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 393 weeks ago
Randall Flagg wrote:buzzsaw wrote:Is mitch the only one that doesn't see the irony in this?
Mitch is incapable of posting anything meaningful. Even when he tries, he posts nonsense. Case and point him arguing Republicans are a monolithic group that always votes the same, and post numbers and his own personal story that completely disprove what he just wrote.
Grasping at straws here with your interpretation. Do your own research for christsake...
You're too wrapped up in this notion of 'American Democracy' and hooray for America. There is copious amounts of literature out there that show what I'm talking about.
Your opinion about what is statistically significant and what a statistics calculation will show you are quite different. Your opinion about what is statistically significant in differences shows how ignorant your analysis has been.
Hillary didn't get the vote out, Trump received pretty much the same support Romney did with the exception of one state in our sampling.
I can't make it any clearer for you than that.
Yea, Mitch. I’m totally going to take advice from you on statistics. When Trump won some states by 30k votes, swings of 100-300k votes matter.
It’s an objective and self evident fact. Hillary lost 100k voters Obama got in 2012. Trump gained over 2 million from Romney.
But I agree with your larger point. So I won’t expect you to be commenting on mass shootings with an ar-15 or the next time some gang banger gets dropped by police for going for his gun. Because these events are incredibly rare and represent the statistically insignificant deviance you’re trying to apply to our last election.
We’ll see how consistent you are. Or if you’ll continue to make posts calling Trump a hate mongerer and tell us how much you hate Trump in the next sentence.
