See, this is the kind of shit I like to discuss.

Trump is wrong to use an EO here, just as Obama was wrong on DACA. But there’s a key distinction here.

Congress already established who could legally reside and be employed in the US. Obama lacked the authority to change that and confer legal status to potentially millions of illegals.

The 14th amendment doesn’t guarantee unrestricted birth right citizenship. It’s certainly the common view, but no court has ever ruled that, and the authors of the amendment certainly didn’t think it would apply to the children of non-citizens.

So IF Trump actually signs this, it will immediately be stopped by a federal court. Not just the 9th circuit, but any court. Because the stakes if Trump is wrong are too great. So it’ll work it’s way through the system to SCOTUS, who will once and for all settle the debate.

I don’t think any rational person can believe the 14th amendment applies to Chinese women who fly here a day before their due date on a tourist visa to get an anchor baby. But SCOTUS, and SCOTUS only gets to decide that.

Anyone claiming the matter is settled or pointing to a law or verdict is a liar or grossly misinformed.

Maybe you don’t think swings of 300k voters is a big deal, but they are.

Clinton lost 100k votes Obama had. Trump gained over 2 million from Romney. Your entire argument is wrong.

If anything, these numbers prove the opposite of your thesis. Votes for Obama and Clinton were statistically the same. Trump had approx 4% more votes than Romney.

But let’s test your theory right now.

I’m a “Republican”, and have voted for a bunch of democrats, Clinton being one of them. You’re a “democrat”. How many republicans have you voted for?

I didn’t say it was, Mitch. I said it was possible. That’s the difference between me and your fellow mouth breathers. I don’t commit to shit before the facts are out. If I’m wrong, I’m wrong. Your truther friend still thinks 9/11 was an inside job and Trump worked with Putin.

You think black people are oppressed in America and that Democrats don’t have violent rhetoric.

If you want to chalk this up as a victory, go ahead. I’m not upset to be wrong.

Now continue to shit post and talk about our cocks.

What the fuck does Trump have to do with this?  Why are you being so disingenuous?  Has he ever advocated people mail bombs to his political opponents?  NO!  HE FUCKING HASN'T. 

Hillary Clinton just said you can't be "civil" to Republicans.  Obama referred to Trump as a dictator.  And that is to say nothing of the hundreds of politicians and media personalities who have accused Trump of being a Russian plant in cahoots with Putin.  If you really thought Trump was a dictator and/or Hitler 2.0, what would you do?   What would a lot of people do if they genuinely thought Hitler was in the White House.

So spare me this bullshit.  Hyperbolic speech is on both sides.  Some Bernie Sanders nut actually fucking shot people.  Not mail bogus, inert bombs (though whether or not this was intentional remains to be seen) that harmed no one.  But actually fucking shot a member of congress and almost killed him.  So if Trump is responsible for this yahoo, who isn't responsible for the nut job that shot up Congress because "THEY'RE GOING TO TAKEAWAY YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE AND KILL MILLIONS OF PEOPLE" rhetoric.

Your argument is absurd.  People claiming this was condoned are absurd.  Blaming anyone but the bomber is absurd.  But I'll gladly wait for the list of names you hold responsible for the congressional baseball shooting and whomever mailed Susan Collins "ricin" last week.  Please let me know which Democrat I should be blaming for that.