You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1741 The Garden » McCain and Obama on Energy » 947 weeks ago
- Saikin
- Replies: 4
Where the candidates stand
Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain has proposed a $300 million government-funded prize for the inventor who could produce a car battery '” one that would reduce electric vehicle costs by 70 percent.
McCain also said that he would offer a $5,000 dollar tax credit for every customer who buys a car that doesn't emit carbon dioxide.
The candidate has also pledged to eliminate mandates, subsidies, and tariffs that exclusively benefit producers of corn-based ethanol.
This would include the 54 cents-per-gallon tax on imported ethanol.
In 2006, Obama argued that the U.S. tariff on imported ethanol must be kept in place in order to protect "home-grown renewable fuels" from foreign competition.
McCain has proposed a temporary halt in the federal excise tax on gasoline during summer driving months, an idea Obama ridiculed.
Expressing concern over the environmental effect of greenhouse gas emissions, McCain is also encouraging the building of 45 new nuclear power plants '” an energy alternative without greenhouse gas emissions.
McCain has also said he would persuade Congress to end the current moratorium on oil and natural gas drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf.
In 1995 and 2005, McCain voted to open part of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to oil drilling.
But prior to the 2005 vote, McCain denounced Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, for attaching the ANWR drilling provision to a Pentagon spending bill, calling it 'disgusting' and 'disgraceful' for the Alaska senator to add an unrelated and contentious measure to a bill with money needed for troops overseas.
As it turned out, Stevens failed to get the 60 votes he needed and ANWR drilling was blocked.
McCain's opponent, Democratic Sen. Barack Obama, until recently opposed additional offshore drilling, arguing that it would take at least five years for the move to lower gasoline prices.
But in a significant change of position, Obama on Aug. 1 said he would be willing to support limited additional offshore drilling.
He said he would make this compromise if it were necessary to get enough votes in Congress to pass a comprehensive plan to encourage fuel-efficient vehicles and develop alternative energy sources.
"My interest is in making sure we've got the kind of comprehensive energy policy that can bring down gas prices," Obama said in an interview with The Palm Beach Post.
"If, in order to get that passed, we have to compromise in terms of a careful, well thought-out drilling strategy that was carefully circumscribed to avoid significant environmental damage '” I don't want to be so rigid that we can't get something done."
Both McCain and Obama support legislation to force American companies to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
Obama has said that the 2005 energy bill for which he voted "contained irresponsible tax breaks for oil companies that I consistently opposed, and that I will repeal as president.
"But the tax credits in that bill contributed to wind power growing 45 percent last year, the sharpest rise in decades," he continued.
"If John McCain had his way, those tax credits wouldn't exist."
McCain voted against that bill.
Obama has said that he would provide $150 billion in subsidies over ten years to companies that produce wind power, solar power, and bio-fuels.
The Democrat has also said he would seek to impose a new tax on energy companies' "windfall profits" and would send $500 to individuals and $1,000 to married couples to help with gasoline and home heating costs.
In 2006, Obama introduced a bill to allow the federal government to pay part of American automakers' retiree health care costs. In exchange, the companies would invest in building more fuel-efficient cars.
Unanswered questions
If Congress enacts a law to limit emissions of carbon dioxide, as desired by both McCain and Obama, how will American energy companies and manufacturers cope with its requirements? Will additional costs be passed on to consumers?
Neither Obama nor McCain has fully addressed how such a complex bill would be administered.
A version of that greenhouse gas legislation, which the Senate debated but did not pass last month, is almost certain to be brought up for reconsideration next year.
That bill would set up a Technology Development Fund which will have more than $500 billion at its disposal over 20 years '” money collected from carbon dioxide emitters.
How will that fund '” perhaps the most powerful federal agency created in many decades '” parcel out the money? Which "clean technology" firms will it subsidize?
Another uncertainty is technological innovation itself.
For instance, how quickly will major automobile manufacturers develop an electric car that middle-class Americans can afford?
Will innovators be able to respond to McCain's $300 million battery prize?
As for Obama's goal of helping to put one million plug-in electric vehicles on the market by 2015, questions remain. Will consumers choose to buy them? What will be the price and the dependability of such vehicles?
Full article... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25664638/
#1742 The Garden » Obama Blasts McCain on the Economy » 947 weeks ago
- Saikin
- Replies: 16
WASHINGTON - Video
Bush says economy can withstand 'adjustments'
Sept. 15: President Bush says he is confident the economy is strong enough to withstand "adjustments" in the financial markets.
MSNBC
Democrat Barack Obama laid into the economic policies of the Republican opposition on Monday and Republican rival John McCain called for a regulatory overhaul of the battered financial sector as Americans awoke to the disappearance of two Wall Street giants.
Obama called the fall of both Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch & Co. "the most serious financial crisis since the Great Depression" of the 1930s.
The Democrat is battling to overcome a significant boost in the polls for his opponent, who stunned Americans and solidified wavering support among his party's Christian conservative base with the choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as running mate. After trailing Obama throughout the run-up to both party conventions, McCain has pulled even or edged slightly ahead in national polling '” primarily riding the wave of Palin's initial popularity.
Deepening turmoil in the U.S. economy, the No. 1 issue among voters despite the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, could resonate in Obama's favor as he tries mightily to link McCain to President George W. Bush, whose stewardship of the United States has left him with near-record disapproval ratings.
McCain and Obama responded Monday to the news overnight that the investment banking firm Lehman Brothers, burdened by $60 billion in soured real-estate holdings, said it was filing for bankruptcy protection after attempts to rescue the 158-year-old institution failed. Its businesses in Britain were already placed in administration, said the administrator, accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Also, Bank of America Corp. said it was buying Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. in a $50 billion all-stock transaction.
Bipartisan agreement: No bailout
Over the weekend, advisers both to McCain and Obama said they did not favor a government bailout like that previously provided to mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The government also help engineer the recent sale of Bear Stearns Cos. to J.P. Morgan & Co.
In a fiery campaign speech in Grand Junction, Colorado, Obama said he did not blame McCain, but "I do fault the economic philosophy he subscribes to. It's a philosophy we've had for the last eight years '” one that says we should give more and more to those with the most and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else."
The address to an outdoor rally closely mirrored a statement Obama had issued shortly after dawn on Monday as Americans were awaking to the fearsome news from Wall Street.
"It's a philosophy that says even commonsense regulations are unnecessary and unwise, and one that says we should just stick our heads in the sand and ignore economic problems until they spiral into crises."
McCain said in a statement issued in advance of market openings that he agreed there should be no taxpayer-financed bailout of Lehman Brothers even as the investment banking giant faced the specter of liquidation.
"It is essential for us to make sure that the U.S. remains the pre-eminent financial market of the world. This will be a highest priority of my administration. In order to do this, major reform must be made in Washington and on Wall Street," McCain said.
Financial turmoil was overshadowing a campaign that has grown increasingly nasty.
A question of 'deception'
Earlier, Obama's campaign announced it would begin airing a new television ad that challenges McCain's campaign tactics '” questionable and, in some cases, untrue assertions about Obama, a first-term senator representing Illinois.
The commercial begins with videotape of McCain saying: "I will not take the low road to the highest office in this land," after which an announcer asks "What's happened to John McCain?"
The 30-second ad then quotes snippets of negative media commentary about the Republican's campaign tactics and concludes: "After voting with Bush 90 percent of the time proposing the same disastrous economic policies it seems 'deception' is all he has left." The word "deception" is attributed to The Washington Post.
McCain, when challenged on the issue last week, said the contest would not have reached this point had Obama agreed to the four-term Arizona senator's call for weekly joint appearances at town hall meetings.
The Republican's campaign also issued a new ad Monday, underscoring concern about the U.S. economy on the same day that he said he still believes the U.S. economy "fundamentals" are strong at a Florida campaign stop.
The ad said, "Our economy in crisis. Only proven reformers John McCain and Sarah Palin can fix it. Tougher rules on Wall Street to protect your life savings. No special interest giveaways. Lower taxes to create new jobs. Offshore drilling to reduce gas prices."
Out of touch?
The Obama campaign ridiculed the commercial.
"Today of all days, John McCain's stubborn insistence that the 'fundamentals of the economy are strong' shows that he is disturbingly out of touch with what's going in the lives of ordinary Americans," spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement. "Even as his own ads try to convince him that the economy is in crisis, apparently his 26 years in Washington have left him incapable of understanding that the policies he supports have created an historic economic crisis."
Obama appears to be refocusing his campaign on the issue distinctions between him and McCain after having spent much of the previous week trying to figure out a campaign strategy to blunt the Republican surge in the polls.
Obama was making campaign stops in the battleground state of Colorado on Monday, while running mate Sen. Joe Biden accused McCain of adopting what he termed the serve-the-rich policies of Bush and the divisive tactics of ex-Bush strategist Karl Rove.
McCain's appearance in Jacksonville, Florida, was his first solo rally since announcing Palin as running mate more than two weeks ago. He was greeted by a crowd of several thousand who filled less than a quarter of the Jacksonville Veterans Memorial Arena.
Palin attended a rally in Colorado, her first outside her home state of Alaska without McCain at her side. She said Obama "wants to raise income taxes and raise payroll taxes and raise investment income taxes and raise business taxes and raise the death tax."
"But John McCain and I know that's not the way you grow the economy," she added.
In fact, independent groups such as the Tax Policy Center have concluded that four out of five U.S. households would receive tax cuts under Obama's proposals.
#1743 The Garden » White House says No More Bailouts » 947 weeks ago
- Saikin
- Replies: 17
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration signaled strongly on Monday that troubled Wall Street shouldn't expect more rescues from Washington.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson declared that the current turmoil in markets and financial institutions ultimately will 'make things better.'
Both President Bush and Paulson worked to calm jitters about the latest developments '” the venerable Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. filing for bankruptcy, Merrill Lynch & Co. being forced to sell itself to Bank of America, and American International Group Inc., the world's largest insurance company, seeking emergency funding to shore up its balance sheet.
'Adjustments in the financial markets can be painful, both for people concerned about their investments and for the employees of the affected firms,' the president said, diverting from planned text for an appearance with visiting Ghanian President John Kufuor to address the economic situation. 'But in the long run I am confident that our capital markets are flexible and resilient and can deal with these adjustments.'
Paulson, making a rare appearance before reporters in the White House briefing room, also sounded notes of optimism.
'What we are going through in the short term doesn't make anything easier,' he said. 'But in the longer term, it's going to make things better, because we've got excesses we need to work through.'
Paulson said he is taking Monday's stock tumble as a good sign '” because the fall was less-severe than expected and occurred in a relatively orderly way. 'I think we're making progress,' he said.
Bush said that federal policymakers are 'focused on the health of the financial system as a whole' and Paulson added later that 'we do not take '” and I don't take '” lightly ever putting the taxpayer on the line to support an institution.' While Paulson didn't categorically rule out future Washington bailouts, his and Bush's comments, taken together, strongly suggested none will be forthcoming.
The federal government seized mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac last week, and engineered the sale of faltering Bear Stearns Cos. to J.P. Morgan & Co. in March by providing a government loan to complete the deal. But Paulson said the previous situations were 'very very different' than Lehman's circumstances.
'Moral hazard is something I don't take lightly,' Paulson said, referring to the belief that when the government steps in to rescue a private company it encourages other companies to engage in risky behavior.
He said he 'never once' considered having the federal government step in and supply any money to resolve the crisis at Lehman Brothers, the nation's fourth largest investment bank which faced huge losses on its mortgage holdings. Starting Friday, Paulson participated in three tense days of negotiations at the New York Federal Reserve Bank in which he held firm to this position, and other financial firms then lost interest in trying to buy Lehman. That forced Lehman to file for bankruptcy protection on Monday.
With the current financial crisis rooted in the problems in the housing market, Paulson sounded positive there, too.
'There is a reasonable chance that the biggest part of the housing correction can be behind us in a number of months '” I'm not saying two or three months but in months as opposed to years,' he said.
Bush said that he, his advisers at the White House and officials 'throughout my administration' are focused intently on the problems and how to 'reduce disruptions and minimize the impact.' Paulson said the government will need additional 'major authorities to wind down financial institutions that aren't banks' over the longer-term to deal with the fallout and prevent similar problems in the future. But he did not detail what those are and said they would take time to wind through Congress.
With candidates pointing at the Bush administration for some share of the blame for the economic turmoil, Paulson said he's not focused on politics and will 'leave history to the historians.'
But he said that Bush's economic policies have been sound and that some of the regulatory and legal structures that have been in place for years '” if not decades '” are part of the problem.
'I'm playing the hand that was dealt me,' Paulson said.
#1744 Re: The Garden » Financial disaster? » 947 weeks ago
McCain/Palin is starting to look better the more i research both sides of this election.
McCain just might be the better of the two options when it comes to the long term future of this country. To me, and this is just my impression, Obama and pretty much all liberals are just looking for easy ways out now, and not worrying about what effect it will have on the future. Now, you can say the same thing about the other side, but it's to a much lesser extent. The whole Obama campaign just looks like it's based off of making people happy in the shortrun.
We've got huge longterm issues to worry about though. Social Security, the value of the dollar, foreign relations, global warming, our dependence on foreign countries etc. Who seems to know more and have a better track record on these issues? McCain/Palin.
#1745 Re: The Garden » Obama camp in panic as ‘Xena’ Sarah Palin scythes through support » 947 weeks ago
McCain has a better energy policy than Obama- that is a pretty scary thought considering Obama is supposed to be all about change. Obama is basically keeping the same thing we have now, just throwing a bandage and some flowers over it.
Obama hasn't elaborated on his plans enough. Ever since he accepted the nomination he's been too busy attacking Palin to elaborate on his policies.
McCain is better people surrounding him than Obama does as far as i'm concerned. Brzezinski being a prime example of a horrible choice by Obama. I read that wikipedia article, and it doesn't look too good to me.
#1746 Re: The Garden » Obama figures it out » 947 weeks ago
I certainly care about what Palin has to say on any issue that pertains to the presidency of the United States.
Care to tell me why you don't care? Are you just going to blindly put your faith behind Obama without knowing what both sides have to offer?
I for one would like to know what both parties are bringing to the table and then making my decision on who can run the country better.
This is why i hate party politics. Just because someone's a democrat, it means they're voting democrat even if it means destroying their own country.
#1747 Re: The Garden » Financial disaster? » 947 weeks ago
So Obama wants to increase spending- which obviously is not doing anything but increasing the damage to the already wounded economy...
And McCain wants to cut taxes- something we also can't afford because the government doesn't have enough money as it is to pay off any debt or decrease any foreign dependency.
So what do we do? To be honest, i think cutting taxes is the lesser of the two evils. Obama wants to take on MASSIVE spending programs (healthcare), which would be the end of our country, because i don't think the American public would be content with half of their paycheck going for taxes.
I for one, am in favor of taxes being increased. Things may be hard on us in the shortrun, but it's the longrun we really have to worry about, and i don't think the longrun is even being thought of right now. All the government and all these corporations are doing is worrying about the shortrun, but if they had been taking into account longrun effects of what they've been doing, we wouldn't be in this mess right now.
I wouldn't even know where to begin with fixing this damage. Kudos to anyone who can start fixing it.
#1748 Re: The Sunset Strip » Pink Floyd member Richard Wright dies at age 65 » 947 weeks ago
Such bad news.
I will watch the Pink Floyd concert i have tonight.
#1749 Re: The Garden » Obama camp in panic as ‘Xena’ Sarah Palin scythes through support » 947 weeks ago
That is a pretty good article James.
Unfortunately it really shows how the American public is. Obsessed with celebrities.
I'd still love it if Obama elaborated on his plans. Still waiting for that.
If i'm not voting for him, i'm not voting.
#1750 Re: The Garden » Obama camp in panic as ‘Xena’ Sarah Palin scythes through support » 947 weeks ago
Obama's main foreign policy adviser is Brzezinski. I seriously urge all Obama followers to research him if you don't know him. He dates back to Carter, and this guy is VEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERY close to the neocons agenda. His actions and views are in full compliance with Bush Doctrine.
Yeah McCain has a hard on for Iran, but that is less scary than Obama's hard on over NATO expansion. Hell, Brzezinski has advocated Soviet/Russia containment for decades. I read a book in the late 90s about the Iran Hostage Crisis, and this guy made me want to puke. I remember when I first heard about his connections to Obama a year ago, I thought it was either a joke or conspiracy crap. Its actually true. I wonder if McCain's digs at Obama about being the "second Jimmy Carter" have anything to do with that connection.
EDIT: After getting a mini wiki crash course on Brzezinski, he actually dates back long before the Carter administration.
For those who never heard of this guy:
That's really not good news. Obama may be a smart man, but he picks the worst people to have around him.
McCain might be a not so smart man, but he picks some good people to be around him.
Which do you choose? I'd say the not so smart man. 
