You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1761 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 400 weeks ago

PaSnow wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

When not a single person connected to Trump has been charged with anything related to the election, when all the conspiracy nuts are proven wrong time and time again, that’s when a rational person acknowledges it’s all a farce.

Right, none 22

Manafort - Russia
Flynn - Russia
Papadopolous - Russia
Gates - Russia
Cohen - Finance Violations
Page - Admitted ties to Russia. Even visited Moscow while working for Trump campaign
Lewandowski - Claimed to not know Page, later admitted to knowing him.

I'm sure the investigation is just gonna end up being for some rando, not Donald J roll


Can you explain how any of those tie to the election? A single one. Keep preaching about how Moses parted the Red Sea.

#1762 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 400 weeks ago

PaSnow wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

Manafort is guilty as fuck. But none of it has anything to do with the election or anything the SC was tasked to investigate.

How can you say this, when you don't even know what he knows, has said to Mueller, or what dirt the SC has on him?

It's just mind boggling. It'd no different than someone saying 'Drew Brees is still playing good, but they're not going to go to the Super Bowl" Like, what, why? How do you know this already...?


I know what he pled guilty too. I know that Comey and Mueller have both said Trump isn’t under investigation. That’s how this works. You need evidence or something credible to accuse someone of wrong doing.

When not a single person connected to Trump has been charged with anything related to the election, when all the conspiracy nuts are proven wrong time and time again, that’s when a rational person acknowledges it’s all a farce.

You want to believe wrong doing occurrence because you hate Trump. But you nor anyone else can provide a single, objective reason why. Then you have the audacity to question my thinking, because I don’t profess to accept something without an ounce of proof.

Here’s the analogy you are avoiding: You’re the guy on the corner screaming God is real, Noah saved every animal on his arc, and Jesus died for our sins and was resurrected. I’m the guy saying you lack any evidence, and the premise is absurd on its face. Then you attack me for not accepting the Bible because so many others do.

#1763 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 400 weeks ago

mitchejw wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

What will the conspiracy crowd say when Manafort pleads to shit unrelated to the election and Trump and doesn’t “cooperate”?

Are we going to end the farce or try to find something, anything, like Trump paying a porn Star not to go on TV or sell a book, which they did anyway, to make it seem like justice is being served.

Manafort is guilty as fuck. But none of it has anything to do with the election or anything the SC was tasked to investigate.

I guess we just need more time. Maybe assign a second SC to investigate all the women Trump slept with without a condom while married.

Why are you so painfully unaware of history and how they got to Nixon?

You know when you lost credibility on this topic, RF? When you said that this process shouldn’t take much time at all because technology should speed up the legal system. Then you doubled down and said if it takes longer than that...then that’s an example of government ineptitude.

It told me right there that you had no interest in finding out what Trump did and did not do. You declared him innocent from the get go...

What you’re seeinb here is very similar to what happened in the 1970s. You have a lot of sketchy people with lots to hide....makes you wonder why so much stench surrounds our President doesn’t it?

Oh no...not you. You don’t wonder that.


So can you list evidence of one person on Trump's team helping Russia during the election.  Cause I can name a member of Clinton's team who paid a British agent to speak with the KGB and create a dossier on Trump of unverified, salacious accusations.

#1764 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 400 weeks ago

What will the conspiracy crowd say when Manafort pleads to shit unrelated to the election and Trump and doesn’t “cooperate”?

Are we going to end the farce or try to find something, anything, like Trump paying a porn Star not to go on TV or sell a book, which they did anyway, to make it seem like justice is being served.

Manafort is guilty as fuck. But none of it has anything to do with the election or anything the SC was tasked to investigate.

I guess we just need more time. Maybe assign a second SC to investigate all the women Trump slept with without a condom while married.

#1765 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 400 weeks ago

For real. That was horrible. Both of them looked like giant chodes

#1767 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 400 weeks ago

Smoking Guns wrote:

Michael Avanotti is about to be on Tucker Carlson. Tune in now. Will be good.

Guarantee he doesn’t make a single claim backed by evidence. He’s announced he’s running in 2020. His antics are no different than the embarrassment Booker performed this week.

#1768 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 400 weeks ago


You know he was moving to hug a cancer patient right?

#1769 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 400 weeks ago

Thanks for sharing a photo of you posting about Trump and Russian collusion. But there’s audio from Kerry’s mouth. Thanks, PaSnow!

#1770 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 400 weeks ago

If you bitched because Flynn communicated with Russia before Trump was sworn in, if you mentioned Logan Act, if you mentioned Treason, please do so again now. You know, to show you actually believe what you say.


https://freebeacon.com/national-securit … diplomacy/

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB