Are you saying you think he’s receiving money from foreign governments or domestically? 

I’ve never understood this argument. He’s not managing the Trump corporation, and did Obama refuse to accept money from his books while in office?  I’m just trying to understand the actual crime here.

You accuse me of listening to Hannity and wonder why I didn’t take your claim of non-racism as legitimate.

The only talk radio I listen to is Stern

Haha, PASnow tried to imply I was a racist suggesting, because he associated pig farmers with illegal immigrants, that I was also associating pigs with illegals.  Turns out her murder was an .... illegal immigrant.  Well done, PASnow!

Is it just me, or are accusations of "racism" the new McCarthyism?  Accusations of racism don't have to be proven or evidenced before the label is applied and immediately accepted by a large segment of society.  I seriously can't think of a worse thing to be called in contemporary America.

Omarosa is touring the country on her "Let's call Trump a racist who wants a race war, while we forget the years of positive comments I've made and pay me lots of money" tour.  Just the mere suggestion that Trump used the "N" word is sufficient for CNN, MSNBC and all the garbage, left-wing online publications to pontificate for hours.  Don't get me wrong, if Trump used that word disparagingly, as in he referred to a group of black people with that word, rather than quote someone like the Papa John's guy did, he has to resign.  I choose not to type that word out because I think repeatedly presenting it is explicit.  You post one photoshopped celebrity as a goof, ok.  You fill the forum with porn, and we have a problem.  There's no law that white people have to pretend the word doesn't exist and can't use it in a proper context.  Saying only people of a certain color can use a specific word, is and of itself, racist.  And we're supposed to be rejecting that in all of its forms. I may consider it poor taste to use is contextually in mixed company, but I don't think it makes a person a horrible human being if they're not using it demeaningly, in private conversation; particularly one that was scrupulously recorded.

We reject racism by refusing to support leaders or public figures who espouse those kind of ideas.  If Trump used that word to refer to a person or group of people, yea, he's got to go.  But there's no evidence of it, and I personally believe if any dirt of Trump existed, much like the Access Hollywood tape, it would have made the circuits a long time ago.  A secret that juicy, that someone "played it" for Omarosa - a fucking nobody, and someone hasn't sold it for millions?  I refuse to suspend my disbelief that far.  But until then we don't convict someone by weaponizing accusations of "racism" for political gain.  So many news outlets want to run stories attacking Trump's honesty.  And that's an absolutely fair critique.  It really is.  But when they give lip service to these horrible and salacious allegations with zero evidence, who the fuck are they to lecture on the truth?  It gives the real Trumpkins all they need to ignore any criticism of Trump, and tells a lot of sane people that the media isn't worth listening too.

It was the same thing with the piss tape.  Those that hated Trump eagerly believe in its existence.  The kind of anti-intellectual gosip shit both sides accept because they want concrete proof their political opponent/enemy is truly dispicable is what really harms our political discourse.  Blanketly labeling someone a racist is no different than lashing out at your enemies and calling them a communist.