You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1801 Re: Guns N' Roses » May 24, 2013 - Rockalahoma, Pryor, OK » 677 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:Riad wrote:???
Just press the new thread button and dish the dirt and lets get it over with
Read what you just quoted and understand what it means. I bolded it to make it clearer for you.
Thank you that was helpful. I still don't see why you can't just screenshot the pms?
Because I don't have them. Thus why I can't prove anything.
#1802 Re: Guns N' Roses » May 24, 2013 - Rockalahoma, Pryor, OK » 677 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:A Private Eye wrote:Not in this thread guys, take it to PMs if you must continue going in circles.
There's nothing to take to PMs. PMs caused this problem to begin with. It's where they hide knowing nobody can prove anything. This discussion has to be out in the open. There is no other way. Once you guys decided to close the thread to discuss it in one place, this is what you're going to get. My advice: reopen one place to discuss it. It's not going away. It's not just going to be forgotten, so you may as well just let it be dealt with until a resolution can be made.
???
Just press the new thread button and dish the dirt and lets get it over with
Read what you just quoted and understand what it means. I bolded it to make it clearer for you.
#1803 Re: Guns N' Roses » May 24, 2013 - Rockalahoma, Pryor, OK » 677 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:There's nothing baseless monkey. Facts are facts and you're the only one (unfortunately) that can prove my claims. Obviously you're not going to do that, so you tell half truths and leave out little details that would make you look bad.
Do you really expect me to believe that your pms to nu bono were just "hey, you're a good guy done wrong" or something to that affect? Get real.
I KNOW what happened. You KNOW what happened, but are choosing not to come clean. You weren't alone in it. Your little gang of bonolovers are all nowhere near as innocent as you claim. You know it. I know it. Others here know it.
Dish the dirt or GTFO
I can't. It's not my dirt to dish. Stop reading it or STFU.
#1804 Re: Guns N' Roses » May 24, 2013 - Rockalahoma, Pryor, OK » 677 weeks ago
Not in this thread guys, take it to PMs if you must continue going in circles.
There's nothing to take to PMs. PMs caused this problem to begin with. It's where they hide knowing nobody can prove anything. This discussion has to be out in the open. There is no other way. Once you guys decided to close the thread to discuss it in one place, this is what you're going to get. My advice: reopen one place to discuss it. It's not going away. It's not just going to be forgotten, so you may as well just let it be dealt with until a resolution can be made.
#1805 Re: Guns N' Roses » May 24, 2013 - Rockalahoma, Pryor, OK » 677 weeks ago
There's nothing baseless monkey. Facts are facts and you're the only one (unfortunately) that can prove my claims. Obviously you're not going to do that, so you tell half truths and leave out little details that would make you look bad.
Do you really expect me to believe that your pms to nu bono were just "hey, you're a good guy done wrong" or something to that affect? Get real.
I KNOW what happened. You KNOW what happened, but are choosing not to come clean. You weren't alone in it. Your little gang of bonolovers are all nowhere near as innocent as you claim. You know it. I know it. Others here know it.
#1806 Re: The Sunset Strip » STONE TEMPLE PILOTS return with CHESTER BENNINGTON as their FRONTMAN! » 677 weeks ago
It is hypocrisy to be pro new GnR and against new STP though. Years don't define a band; if they did, this band would be GnR, not the old band, but a large, large percentage of people will never recognize this band as GnR. It's because of what they accomplished and the level they reached, not the number of years.
I don't consider either band to be the real thing. I don't consider Van Hagar to be VH either. Same with BS. I think the only one I recognize is AC/DC and a) the singer died...he wasn't fired or didn't run off with the band name; and b) they were more popular (at least in the US) with their new singer than they ever were with there old one (thus relating to what they accomplished).
#1807 Re: Guns N' Roses » River City Rock Fest - San Antonio, Texas May 26, 2013 » 677 weeks ago
Is 18 GnR songs (or officially released covers) pretty standard for a festival? I know there are some time limitations, but that seems low to me.
#1808 Re: Guns N' Roses » May 24, 2013 - Rockalahoma, Pryor, OK » 677 weeks ago
Buzzsaw was doing his best Axl by not actually stating what Monkey (Slash) did.
It's not my story to tell...I wasn't involved in any of it, I just know what happened.
#1809 Re: Guns N' Roses » River City Rock Fest - San Antonio, Texas May 26, 2013 » 677 weeks ago
I question whether he has as much money as you think. He's not in the poorhouse, but I'm not convinced he doesn't need to tour either.
#1810 Re: Guns N' Roses » May 24, 2013 - Rockalahoma, Pryor, OK » 677 weeks ago
Nobody cares about new music but the hardcores, and half of them don't care either. I thought dream world would have ended when CD had the limited success it did and everything went back to same old same old right away, but some of you never learn. Promoting it isn't going to help. People knew CD came out. It went to the $1.99 bin.
