You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1961 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 530 weeks ago

It's interesting that comment from the promoter wanting to know if Axl is going to take this seriously, and can he sing these songs.

I think the CD era was out of goodwill.

Slash and Duff buys him a pass to turn this into a legitimate big nostalga act along the lines of Aerosmith, Ac/DC (before this recent Brian incident) and Motley (at least until the farewell tour). But that's going to require a decent vocally. You can get away with it being a bit crap (Vince Neil live for example) if you bring a pro show and everything else is in place.

I think Axl has Slash and Duff back for that reason - it takes a lot of pressure of him. In a chinese demo band it's up to him to be the best. In a reunion band he can be the weaker link and it's still GNR.

That said. I think it's make or break time.

Hopefully he'll come out strong and these shows will be amazing, and then the label will look into some type of release to go with AFD next year.

#1962 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 530 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

I'll just say, I don't take the drum head as a definite sign of who is in or out.

Sorum for life wink

#1963 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 530 weeks ago

misterID wrote:
monkeychow wrote:
misterID wrote:

Why are we talking about Matt Sorum?

Just filling up the deafening silence from the band while we wait.

GNR fans have perfected the art of bitching about anything. 16

Yeah I forgot I'm required to be positive because it seems like something good might happen.

Of course we're supposed to overlook the fact that the band has self- sabotaged every single attempt at activity since 1993 one way or another.

It won't happen this time.

#1964 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 530 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

Why are we talking about Matt Sorum?

Just filling up the deafening silence from the band while we wait.

#1965 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 530 weeks ago

Major Mayhem wrote:

   They're all just playing other people's parts.

But are they? Did Adler come up with the You Could Be Mine Drum intro?

As for songwriting credits the normal practise is to credit the song to whomever wrote the lyrics and the melody of the song. Not "the music" but "the melody". This is inherently harsh on bass players and drum players who are often very creative in jams but are not formally writing "the molody" which is why a lot of bands have a practise of diving publishing among all members anyway to promote harmony. However some bands don't.

The bottom line is writing the words to YCBM or the guitar riff to YCBM will earn you a writing credit but that drum part won't. Yet it's kinda important to the song. So going off who has the writing credits is not the sensible way to test contribution to the band as it's full of legal shonkiness.

#1966 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 530 weeks ago

TheSundanceKid wrote:

I thought a lot of the Illusions albums had Steven all over it.

From memory he only plays on Civil War.

I see the style of those albums as distinctly Matt - it's quite similar to contraband.

TheSundanceKid wrote:

I don't think he did it diplomatically he had a choice and he choose the shitty hair metal band he belongs in.

I felt he was pretty tactful about it though. He gave a statement thanking Axl and the fans for his time - expressed how much he had enjoyed his time in the band. Then later said positive things about the return of Slash.

Sure he quit, but when you consider the chance he had to talk shit he was really very polite about it all. For instance we know he was songwriting with Axl on songs that never came out. He could easily rant on about how he tried to get Axl to release an album but Axl wouldn't or whatever.


TheSundanceKid wrote:

To conclude, Sorum hate is because he is a prick / dip shit.

I have two thoughts about this. The first is that if fandom of GNR required the band to be nice guys all the time there would be no fans. I mean Axl has a bit of a history with his wives, slash has the jet boy incident, Izzy used to deal drugs - no saints in GNR. I don't think anything sorum has done are worse than those incidents. Secondly, Sorum was very classy about Adler at the Rock hall - sharing the stage with him - saying he'd only do a reunion if he was involved - he didn't have to be nice to him but he was.

At the end of the day I'm sure the show will be good with just Axl and Slash....but I'm just saying I think Matt should be respected for his contributions and it's disappointing he's not involved.

#1967 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 530 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

We have Axl, Slash and Duff in the same band and it doesn't seem to be good enough.

Spot on.

I've been a fan since 87 or something but somewhere I've lost a bit of patience.

It started around 2009 when they let that amazing tour doco of the asian tour languish and die....just like they had the 2006 era doco...the second CD album...the cinema release and a bunch of other stuff.

Then it got worse  when Slash starting going solo and using up his best riffs with session musos instead of GNR and VR where he had world famous chemistry with people on his level. Just cos it's easier to do his own thing.

What was the turning point? Maybe it was Rock In Rio 2012 (Still referred to by the general public on youtube as "The Axl Rose Disaster") where you watch it back and academically wonder how a band with so much talent can do that to itself.

Maybe it the hall of fame, where Axl didn't rock up, Dizzy made some excuse, Izzy was too cool again, and we wound up with Myles kennedy and fucking greenday talking about GNR.

Maybe it's that there's unreleased songs being hoarded from 2001 and it's 2016 this year.

I think a MAJOR part of it started in 2014 in vegas when GNR faithfully promised us through it's mastabatory series of fernando and band hints that something special would happen - only to perform basically a rehash of it's previous vegas residency only with less rasp and less enthusiasm across the board.

But come to think of it - it might be that they chose one of those performances as the one to release on BD - all be it a couple years on as usual. Never mind all the asskicking stuff in the vault from better shows.

Then this reunion started. It's kinda disconcerting on some level. I mean Axl said he would die first. Slash and Duff have always been holding out for something to change. In a way it's disturbing for Axl to cave on his hatred and Slash to cave on his principles but fuck me....the world has needed GNR badly for 30 years (because basically Axl's solo GNR refuses to release enough to fill the void). So I was happy anyway. Fuck how can you not be happy about a GNR reunion with Axl and Slash right?

But then they cancelled that TV interview where they were going to explain what was going on. Then they decided it was best to play more secrecy shit like they have for 30 years. Can't tell us the line up. Can't explain if there's plans for a full tour. Can't tell us the status if there's new music or not. Can't even say who is in the fucking band.

And you know what i'm tired of it. I'm tired of everything being self sabotaged. I'm tired of them shitting all over their own artistic creation with the bullshit that's gone on - be it the petty fights, the vaulting of creative output or whatever. Axl can call me a cunt or whatever and say he owes us nothing - but i'm not so sure. At some point if you live in the luxury of fame, if you were gifted with the sort of talent Axl and Slash got from god, the universe or their genes or whatever you have a fucking responsibility to stop ruining it. It's like someone knowing the cure to illness but just not feeling like sharing it.

So yeah...obviously i'm happy to see Axl and Slash play together next month...but you know what I'm sick of taking the minimum - it's about time they did something properly but it's painfully obvious they don't give a fuck what fans want and scorn anyone who even likes them.

#1968 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 530 weeks ago

BLS-Pride wrote:

I gotta agree. It's a win/win for both parties. Slash and Duff get to come "home" and Axl gets legitimacy back to his brand.  And they all get to count the cash. 16

Exactly.

Both sides have given up the war of attrition.

Slash and Duff have realised they are never going to get back full control, but that it's better to do a handful of shows every few years on Axl's terms than to allow the reputation of the old band to be tarnished further. They have their solo projects to console themselves and get their rocks off. Then the occasional GNR gig will be like a party for old times and make some money.

Then on Axl's side of the fence it's no surprise that this happens when he can not drag the comatose brand any further alone. The replacements of the the replacement's replacements were getting frustrated and would soon need to be replaced again. The label wouldn't be giving a second industrial album with people who arn't in the band anymore and never were from the real band a proper push. The promoters would have more realistic ideas of what numbers the non-original band can pull in it's 3rd or 4th time out. The band has already done two vegas residencies. Meanwhile Axl only has the voice left in him for a few more years at most.

Where do we go now? The only sane thing for everyone was to reunite.

#1969 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 530 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

They wanted to join the CHINESE DEMOCRACY band. Not a reunion. They wanted back with Axl.

That's semantics though.

They wanted back in Guns N Roses because they founded it, because they wrote 83% of the bands songs, because newer bands were never accepted by the music listening public and Axl's instance that it is GNR is considered a joke to most , and because touring under the GNR brand will bring significantly more money than any of their solo efforts would.

It's not like they wanted in the band so they can play with Pittman and Frank. It's not like they've seen the light and want to start making industrial songs and follow that vision.

#1970 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 530 weeks ago

If it's a new line up then it  will need to do something like make some music, and it's curious that if it's not a reunion the entire branding of the band has reverted back to 1991.

I guess Matt would want to be paid properly though, much like Izzy would.

I'm excited about these shows, but I don't think the band is covering itself in glory here - selling out old members so they don't have to pay them - not even giving fans the respect of an interview to explain either why this happened or where it's headed. I mean i'm excited about the show...but as I said earlier in the thread...it's clear all of them are just always out for #1.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB