You can talk about Islamaphobia while they behead you

I just don't see any other leader stepping up.  They're all too small and they're already doing what Trump is proposing - working in their bests interests.  Europe is only relevant as a standard bearer of human comfort and civility.  They're only desirable because in their major cities, it's quite comfortable and cultured.  I can't think of any other city so docile and refined as Paris.  It's a world class city that still has its own culture and isn't a concrete jungle like NYC or Hong Kong.  France's buying power is in the top 5, so of course smaller nations want to enter business partnerships and diplomacy with them.  But they're not a military power to be feared or an economy so powerful it can single handedly swing the balance of power. 

Regardless of your opposition to it, force projection is what keeps the world in line.  It's why China isn't taking over other countries.  It's why until Obama, Russia refused to provoke the US and the world order.   Right or wrong, the war in Iraq proved our force projection.  It accomplished what Vietnam didn't and embarrassed us for.  We, along with support from Britain and Australia, our closest allies, completely decimated an entire nation from their military, government and economy and rebuilt them to stability.  Iraq didn't completely fall after Barry pulled out, but it created ISIS and destabilized their entire country.  Obama objectively weakened our force projection and as a direct result, the world has suffered because he wasn't a leader.  He was an academic.  He relegated himself to the same status as Merkel or May, to the detriment of world order.

If you think any action is going to come from this from the rest of the world, you're wrong.  I didn't agree with Trump's airstrike in Syria.  I still don't.  But it accomplished the goal of telling the world that Obama is gone.  America will punch you in the fucking mouth if you fuck around.  That there are consequences for bad behavior.  Slapping sanctions and giving speeches resonates with the comfortable public.  The people that pretend America isn't a sheep dog in a field of wolves and sheep. 

So no, I don't see someone else stepping up.  Passionate speeches with no action behind them isn't leadership.  It's talk.  We had 8 years of that and the bad guys knew it.  Trump may be a fucking goofball, but there's not a single thing you can claim he's doing that he doesn't thoughtfully believe to be in the best interest of America, even at the detriment to other countries.  The EU will role their eyes, but they'll attend the fucking dinners, shake hands and make sure they don't bite the hand that not only feeds it, but keeps it safe.

He's not?  Who replaced him?

You don't know that.  That's my biggest grievance with your line of thought.  You accept any article or story that paints Trump as negative as fact.  You don't know what impact that memo had on Comey.  You don't know if it was fake.  You want to believe any story that the media generates about Trump.  Hillary wasn't corrupt or incompetent.  She doesn't suffer from blood clots or seizures.  All manufactured attack jobs to keep the glass ceiling from being broken. 

But Trump paid prostitutes to piss on a bed Obama slept in.  He hates America and worked with Putin.  Maher has said it best.  The left takes Trump literally but not seriously.  The right takes him seriously but not literally.  Trump didn't advocate Russia hack Hillary.  She hid 30k emails that her and her staff deemed irrelevant.  They never turned them over.  They claimed there was no wrong doing.  We know all of that was horseshit.  I don't want to rehash the email saga because it was boring and frankly I don't give a fuck.  But you make these wild accusations you know are untrue or you defy common sense to make a point.  Russia never even compromised Hillary's server (that we know of).  Trump made a joke because Queen Hillary hadn't done a press conference in 6 months and tried to argue that the same person who took money from half the people she met with, repeatedly lied (sniper, emails, benghazi to name an objective few) and fixed the primary was perfectly capable and objective enough to decide what information was relevant and what wasn't. 

You had no problem with any of this, and still argue Comey didn't say Clinton broke the law.  No, what he said was he wasn't going to prosecute because they never would have gotten a conviction due to the lawyers Clinton would have had and it wouldn't have been resolved for years.  So rather than follow that principle, you're all too eager to make assumptions that because someone met with someone CNN told you was a bad person, create a story about what happened behind closed doors without a single piece of evidence to support your conclusion.  Classified emails were recovered.  The footage of her never taking fire were released.  The intel from Benghazi has been made public.  The DNC leaks showed how her team coordinated with both the media and DNC to control the narrative.  Hillary was under investigation too (and she still might be) but she had no problem making numerous statements denying she was under investigation. 

But Trump is the evil fucking goon here.  You're making assumptions and accepting narratives as fact without any evidence to do so.

I totally agree with you he's a bad fit for the office.  He doesn't understand diplomacy.  It's why I didn't vote for him.  But you're trying to justify or associate that dislike with unproven and unsubstantiated allegations about illegal activity.  And let's be completely honest.  There's no way he can do a worse job than Obama when it comes to foreign affairs.  ISIS, refugees and all the chaos in the ME are entirely due to Obama's dovey/academic/naive understanding of the world.  No one gave a fuck about or feared Obama.  He was a well spoken and intelligent man with no real accomplishments.  Certainly none in government.  At least Trump turned 100 Million dollars into Billions and is one of the most well known and respected real estate tycoons in History.