Randall Flagg wrote:

misterID wrote:

We need to establish no evidence and refusing to consider ANY evidence. There's plenty of evidence. It's kind of fitting that a right wing parrot keeps repeating the same thing over and over...

Says the guy who's repeating far left talking points and can't point to any evidence to support his fantasy.

The second anyone comes forward from the intel committees or intelligence agencies and says "I have proof and will be sharing said information immediately with my peers before alerting the public" I'll eagerly listen. If Trump worked with Russia, he should be shot. But MO ONE has done that. McCain explicitly said there's no evidence supporting claims Trump coordinated with Russia.  You continue to "know" what really happened in the same way my mom knows my dad is in heaven watching over her.

I don't want a dossier dropped at my feet. I want a single credible person, including Schiff, to come forward and say "I found the evidence".  I don't want a bunch of internet Sleuths playing Colombo or James Brown talking about how racist Trump is while linking her campaign fund saying she'll impeach him and not offer a single objective reason why.

That's all any of you are doing at this point.  No different than the idiots who screamed Benghazi or birth certificate for 8 years.

When did I repeat left wing talking points? It was reported, by journalists I trust, that there was a group of FBI agents within the agency called Trumpland. It was then reported that they were close with Guliani. Rudy went on FOX bragging something BIG was going to drop. It did and was reported it was those FBI agents pushing it.

You can choose not to believe it, but you cannot tell us what we need to believe or decide what's universally credible for everyone. That's what you need to cut out.

The investigation into Russian collusion/meddling has only intensified. Clinton Watts told the Senate Intelligence Committee that Russia interfered in the general as well as the primary election. Flynn is now trying to offer testimony so he doesn't go to prison, and Flagg still calls it all a conspiracy.

Seriously...

Where did the article say Trump worked or coordinated with Russia?  That's what you believe and continually argue. So tell me what I'm cherry picking and what I'm ignoring from that article that gives any suggestion Trump's campaign was coordinating with Russia?

I asked you this last time an article came up, and you ignored it.  Show me where I'm wrong.

"The op-ed would not have mentioned whether the FBI was investigating Donald Trump’s campaign workers or others close to him for links to the Russians’ interference in the election, a second source with knowledge of the request tells Newsweek."

Randall Flagg wrote:

Quit being disingenuous.  No one is claiming Obama spied on Trump.

They're not? That's funny.

Randall Flagg wrote:

Comey wanted to inform us that Russia was actively working to impact our election by smearing Clinton.

Yes, but you're leaving out the other half of that equation. You're cherry picking that,and ignoring the rest of the article. You must accept the information in its entirety, not just what you like.

Randall Flagg wrote:

There's a difference between being a skeptic and someone who will believe anything about someone they dislike. You clearly fall into the latter, and all your diversions and interpretations of others opinions doesn't change that.

Again. Make a point without personally talking about me, Mitch, Snow, ID...whoever. You're incapable of doing that. You constantly misquote articles, posters you disagree with and even yourself when needed.