You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#301 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR - VEGAS, T-Mobile Arena Show, 4/8 » 552 weeks ago

otto wrote:

It was during RiR 2011. In RiR 3(2001) the openers were Oasis. I was there smile

On topic: Stage setup is pretty boring. Seems half-assed.

I agree. I don't know if they are going for a throwback 90's, let's pick up in 1994 where we left off gimmick or what, but the first thing I noticed with that stage was "is that it?"

Seems dated, if not half-assed. I agree.

Maybe there's more digital shit with the monitors or pyro to come or something to spruce it up.

#302 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR - VEGAS, T-Mobile Arena Show, 4/8 » 552 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

That's a really short set.

Yeah I agree. I figured AIC would play at least 12 songs.

Especially considered how much money the attendees paid.

Maybe management didn't pay AIC as much as they thought?


I have no clue

#303 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR - VEGAS, T-Mobile Arena Show, 4/8 » 552 weeks ago

Swap out Got Me Wrong with Nutshell, and Stone with Phantom Limb... and I might would've passed out before GN'R ever hit the stage!


9

#304 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR - VEGAS, T-Mobile Arena Show, 4/8 » 552 weeks ago

Final AIC setlist:

1) Again
2) Check My Brain
3) Them Bones
4) Stone
5) Rooster
6) Got Me Wrong
7) Man In The Box
8) No Excuses
9) Would?

#305 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR - VEGAS, T-Mobile Arena Show, 4/8 » 552 weeks ago

Mama's Good Boy wrote:
FlashFlood wrote:

Arena was about 15% full when the lights went down. AIC put asses in seats the first note they played.

Aic was hands down the best opening act I've ever seen.    fantastic.


Amazing. I'm really hoping they open the whole tour. I've never actually seen them live. Just timing never worked out.

If I got to see my two favorite artists ever, GN'R & AIC in the same show. It'd more than makeup for the ticket price. As far as i'm concerned, it'd be a double-bill.

Hopefully AIC plays more songs than tonight tho.

#306 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 552 weeks ago

Cramer wrote:

This thing is going to the convention...for the GOP anyway. What a mess.


I hear rumors, believe it or not, the Democrats are thinking it too.

Bernie right now is on a winning streak, and like I told you before, there is a LARGE LARGE segment of the Democratic party who HATES Hilary, and would almost rather Trump win than Hilary. There's been rumors of an insurrection in the Democratic party that want to pull a brokered convention with the DNC in order to give Bernie a final push over Hilary, feeling the party more lines with Bernie, who's a TRUE progressive (gotta give him that), and Hilary is basically a neo-Con in a Democratic suit (which is true too).

Whether it'll happen? I doubt it. Hilary is a Bilderberger, an insider... she's already a lock. They might lose their stranglehold on the GOP with a Trump nom... they're willing to possibly let that happen. No way they let Hilary get up-staged by Bernie, even if it's the right thing to do.

The political system is shitting itself with the mere thought of a Sanders vs. Trump election (even if I think it'd be bad ass)

Those Bernie supporters ain't shutting up, and many people in the Democratic party have been pissed that people like Bill, Hilary & Obama in recent years have toed the line with liberal social policies, but leaving the door open for almost NEO-CON fiscal policies, with the exception of the tax code. They raise taxes on the upper class, but allow the uber-rich to go off scot-free, allow opt-outs to Medicaid-expansion in states like Florida with sitting Republican governments (which is why I am without health insurance, along with others in other states), and Bernie represents the disenfranchised on the other side who are jobless and saddled with college loan debt because they were sold a bill of goods, and see how the rest of the world works, albeit with VERY little understanding of the problems of socialism... but it means nothing...

In a nutshell, there are Democrats who feel like people like Bill, Hilary & Obama don't go FAR ENOUGH in instituting Democratic and progressive policies in the same manner Trump appeals to populists.

There are many people in the Democratic party in America that would love to see the party institute a system similar to how Canada is run, and don't understand why in the 21st century, when the rest of the world is Socialist, why the U.S. continues to argue about such trivial bullshit.

I can't blame them, even if I don't agree with them on half of what they say.

Bernie appeals to "the rest". Problem is "the rest" is the majority of the Democratic party, REGARDLESS of how many of the insider "Super delegates" Hilary has.

#307 Re: The Garden » Panama Papers Scandal » 552 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:

People are so used to crooked politicians that this only meets expectations. When I saw the news it was like hearing it will rain today. Of course the rich are hiding money.

Albeit here I am inclined to agree with the crooks, who wouldn't want to hide some money in this tax structure?


Because the problem is, government isn't the bad guy. They're both bad guys. The super rich and government have been in an incestuous relationship since the dawn of the industrial age. They've always been in bed with each other.


Even these Panama Papers only scratch the surface. They name names, but they name #3's, #4's... not the top of the pyramid. The Rothschilds & Rockefellars have been basically controlling the world for the last century and play all of us against each other.

What did John D. Rockefeller say on his dying bed... "i'd trade it all... for a little more". It'll never be enough.


Fuck the tax structure. Government isn't the savior of the people. The people are. The industrial age RUINED the world. They didn't end starvation and scarcity, they promoted it. And still do. We are all slaves on a slave colony for these people. We are nothing but rats & sheep to them. Nothing.


Again, shocking, but not shocking. And again... these papers don't name the real players.


How will they solve all this?

They'll find one scapegoat. They'll take the fall. The rest will get off scot-free and even the scapegoat will get a pardon.


And the sun will rise tomorrow

#308 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2016 Summer Stadium 'Not In This Lifetime' Tour » 552 weeks ago

I grabbed a ticket today for Orlando (July 29th).

I tried to get tix, right when they went on sale at 10am ET, and it was a fucking nightmare. The system was buggy as hell, said their was like ALL SEATS AVAILABLE (really?), then took them away, then shut it down and said it was experiencing technical difficulties.

Came back later around 5pm, and a totally different layout was there to select each seat, plus a classic 'Guns N Roses' banner above the sale.


But the prices... fuck... the prices man.

I wanted to get a side stage seat ticket, like I have the two previous NA tours, but none were on sale. The ones mid-range from the stage were $250 large. Then the ones down on the floor were like $400-450 bucks (not kidding), unless you wanted to sit back at the mixer and THAT was $250 bucks. They were selling 3rd tier seats, which at the Citrus Bowl are BENCHES... you know, like a High School football game... BENCHES, and they were $100 after fees.

Are you kidding?

Anyways, I kept trying to fuck with the system, and come up with something and finally I found the best value which was a 2nd-terrance seat, close to the stage, but one tier up, for $150. Even after all the bullshit endgame gimmicks, it was still over $200 bucks.

But it seems to be a good ass seat too, without the extra $100.

Either way... it better be a good goddamn show. These are fucking World Series prices man.

#309 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR - VEGAS, T-Mobile Arena Show, 4/8 » 552 weeks ago

AIC setlist so far:

1) Again
2) Check My Brain
3) Them Bones
4) Stone
5) Rooster

#310 Re: Guns N' Roses » DUFF MCKAGAN's Wife Says Troubadour Concert Was a Pretty Magical Night » 552 weeks ago

It's labeled new, because of two reasons. 1) Label never gave CD a proper rollout (which is why Axl defiantly toured it THREE times), and 2) most people, after the 2002 fiasco + 2006 fiasco, had already bailed by the 2008 release.

I think there's alot of people out there, that weren't the 5,000 people in attendence at nuGuns shows, just have never ever heard these Chinese songs. So they're new to them.

Even in 2006, which everyone saw as the holy grail reboot... I saw a show in front of 3,000 people. Maybe it was poor booking by Merck, I dunno... but all these hype that people thought was there, even in 2006 -- was not.

The band however was on fire musically.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB