Randall Flagg wrote:

misterID wrote:

Lynch recused herself from investigations voluntarily. She never denied meeting with him. She never lied under oath. Jeff Sessions spoke to the Russian ambassador twice. He also pursued impeachment of Bill Clinton for lying under oath.

When did she recuse herself?  It wasn't right away. And no, Sessions didn't. Quit lying or buying liberal talking points. Sessions was asked under oath if he discussed the election with any foreign governments. Do you have any evidence his handshake involved discussing the election.

This is why your party is at its weakest point nationwide in over 100 years. You scream foul at the wind and pretend mentally ill people can really change their stripes.

You have the audacity to get worked up about Jewish cemeteries and blame Trump, but your party just appointed an openly anti Semitic, black nationalist as its number 2. No one who doesn't have their head shoved up their ass thinks your party has a single valid idea for moving forward. They're on fucking TV hand and hand with convicted felons and drug dealers, saying it's inhuman we're kicking them out for violating our laws.  You never see a Democrat standing with the widow of a police officer who was killed by a gang banger, but they'll sure as shit drag out the mother of a gang banger shot by a cop.

You all were jerking each other off because the father of a fallen soldier didn't want to shake Trump's hand. I've noticed you went fucking silent when his widow was in the audience Tuesday standing next to Ivanka.

Your party did nothing for 8 years besides pass Obamacare and wreck the insurance industry. Yes, even your beloved Bill Clinton said as much.

You had your chance and spent it worried about violent criminals and illegal immigrants and didn't give a fuck about the average American. You lost and now your party is a minimum of 4 years away from even having a say. Just shut the fuck up for a while and let the grown ups work. You guys have had long enough to play make believe.

Who is having yet another temper tantrum here? And don't call me a liar. Be a grown up and look it up. It's not hard. I haven't screamed foul, I have never mentioned anything about Jewish cemeteries. You're the one here lying, making up arguments, continuing to get riled up over a guy you didn't vote for who is painfully obviously either compromised by Russia or is really that much of a greedy, self absorbed idiot with a disturbing infatuation with Putin.

Republicans (and Sessions) are started to cave in to "recusing" him, whereas now Dems have moved onward to "resigning". lol, funny how it happens that way.

Randall Flagg wrote:

PaSnow wrote:

Well that's been a waste of money. Mitchjw has been calling you a 'neanderthal' for 387 pages in the other thread.

I won't tolerate your bigotry against my people.  You can't use the "N" word around me.  It's been used for centuries as a derogatory term implying lack of intellect. Your people came to my homeland 50k years ago and butchered and ate my people, driving them to extinction.  Where are my reparations!  I think all of Europe should be turned over to me and my kin so we can continue our legacy of cave paintings!

It's ok. We'll just go ahead and quarantine your kind up into a cold, remote wasteland in North Dakota then years later build an oil pipeline across your land so we can profit!

Randall Flagg wrote:

PaSnow wrote:

Or it would require overturning or rewriting the 14th Ammendment.

It would?  When did anchor babies gain US Citizenship?  Was it decided by a court case or was it decided by Lyndon Johnson in the 1960s?  This is the problem.  The left pushes the false narrative that the 14th amendment somehow grants citizenship to anyone born on US soil.  No court has ever ruled that this is how the 14th amendment is interpreted (Wong dealt with the children of legal residents) and "anchor babies" didn't receive citizenship until Johnson decided to do it that way in the 1960s.  All congress would have to do is pass a bill establishing new citizenship guidelines.  SCOTUS would be hard pressed (as well as any rational person) to interpret the meaning behind the 14th Amendment as granting citizenship to people who illegally enter our country instead of ensuring citizenship to former slaves and their children in the Reconstruction Era South.

Speaking of a "wall of text"

Entering this country "legally" has sure been a bulls eye that seems to move over the years.

You dug in your heels over anchor babies....but I have to ask....have you ever met one?

Likely not....