Maybe because Obama didn't want to do anything about anchor babies or thought people committing felonies shouldn't be targets for deportation.  But why get into the details of a proposal.  You still seem to think any of the nonsense Bernie put forward was remotely realistic.

It's a joke, killer.

I never supported the Benghazi bullshit. I was upset that they lied and blamed it on a bullshit YouTube video, but the ambassador was warned and stayed.  If they realistically thought the marines could have helped, they should have been sent regardless if they believed some marines may die. But that wasn't the case, so casually sending armed marines into a civilian force with no chance of rescuing the Americans, was the right call. Hillary can't be faulted for the State department's response on Benghazi.

But our embassy being taken over is a hell of a lot more severe and concerning than any soldier dying in a combat mission. How many soldiers died last year?  Do you even know?  It happens fairly regularly even now, and there's no big story about it. That's what soldiers do in war. They kill and harm others while being killed and harmed.

None of us know the details of the operation. So assuming it is something worth of an investigation reaks of political opportunism rather than real concern. If McCain and others on the Armed Services committee have information the entire operation was flawed and somehow illegal, they should investigate. But losing lives and injuries is part of the military's job. There's no one doing it not aware of the risks.

He was only 14 votes off from getting it first round. Then the mayor guy you liked dropped out, and Ellison's team falsely alerted everyone he had thrown his support behind him. They retracted it, but that's some shady shit right there.

That's how close the DNC came to being taken over by the Sanders/Warren wing.  Way too close for comfort. Now they have a reasonable chair, while still progressive, who will be able to help the party get back on track as the advocate of the working class instead of the special snowflake crowd. If Trump continues to prattle off like a drunk fratboy, the opposition will have real, qualified candidates instead of angry morons trying to find offense at every word.

You make no sense.  You just point out stupid shit that has nothing to do with the point being made.  Yes. prohibition was stupid.  No argument here.  What the hell does that have to do with it not being a law legally passed (in your example, a constitutional amendment was passed)?  If your argument is "we shouldn't follow laws we don't like", I can't respond to that, because it's infantile and not realistic.  We don't get to pick and choose the laws we follow, otherwise I'd have a body count into the quadruple digits by now.  So change the law, but don't make half hearted, lazy comparisons that have no real similarity.