You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#3151 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 482 weeks ago
The kids speak English. I just can't wrap my mind around the woman who was deported recently who had been here for years, had kids here, and yet she couldn't speak English, even though her kids could fluently. That's ridiculous.
When I lived in El Paso it was a huge burden on the public schools. MOst of the younger kids didn't speak english, so they had to hire aides to translate and it slowed down the education of other students.
#3152 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 482 weeks ago
Randall Flagg wrote:mitchejw wrote:And then what? Ounce their gone and your life hasn't changed one bit....then what?
Blame someone or something else for the fact that you're always angry.
I don't blame them for anything besides breaking the law. We remove them, they no longer pop out children that take billions in public welfare they're not entitled to. They don't encourage their family to come here. They don't clog up our schools with children who don't speak English. I could go on and on, but the law is the law. Liberal guilt isn't a valid reason to stand by and watch the demographics of our country change and become a Mexican version of Pakistan.
Take "liberal guilt" out of it...what's tangibly going to change? Are taxes going to go down? Is cancer going to be cured? Is the economy going to return to 80s form?
Once all that is inevitablely accompmished...what difference is it all going to make...other than we can all pat ourselves on the back.
Billions upon Billions of our tax dollars going to citizens instead of people who flaunt our laws? Is this even a serious question. It's the law. That's how a society functions.
#3153 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 482 weeks ago
Randall Flagg wrote:AP is claiming the White House is preparing to mobilize the National Guard to help remove illegals. White House patently denies it, but I'd be 100% behind this depending on the manner they were used. I'd like the guard to be used as a counter pro-test force in case the nutters think violence is protected speech, and to help secure detention and holding areas. I'd establish holding tents on military bases (just try to tresspass and protest on a military base and see what happens) with air fields that could use C-17s and C-130s to fly those marked for deportation back. We have plenty of barracks and housing areas built up for training for the wars in Iraq and Afganistan. Would be perfect to use them to temporarily house civilians, and if it's good enough for our Soldiers, it's certainly good enough for illegals convicted of crimes.
And then what? Ounce their gone and your life hasn't changed one bit....then what?
Blame someone or something else for the fact that you're always angry.
I don't blame them for anything besides breaking the law. We remove them, they no longer pop out children that take billions in public welfare they're not entitled to. They don't encourage their family to come here. They don't clog up our schools with children who don't speak English. I could go on and on, but the law is the law. Liberal guilt isn't a valid reason to stand by and watch the demographics of our country change and become a Mexican version of Pakistan. Nearly 25% of that country has fled to the United States. That's nothing short of an invasion and can't be tolerated.
#3154 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 482 weeks ago
AP is claiming the White House is preparing to mobilize the National Guard to help remove illegals. White House patently denies it, but I'd be 100% behind this depending on the manner they were used. I'd like the guard to be used as a counter pro-test force in case the nutters think violence is protected speech, and to help secure detention and holding areas. I'd establish holding tents on military bases (just try to tresspass and protest on a military base and see what happens) with air fields that could use C-17s and C-130s to fly those marked for deportation back. We have plenty of barracks and housing areas built up for training for the wars in Iraq and Afganistan. Would be perfect to use them to temporarily house civilians, and if it's good enough for our Soldiers, it's certainly good enough for illegals convicted of crimes.
#3155 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 482 weeks ago
Randall Flagg wrote:PaSnow wrote:That's funny, but that equally applies to the hundred liberal groups that pop up yelling about nonsense. I'm not worried about losing the Bernie crowd at Wal-Mart either.
The wal-mart crowd can't afford Nordstrom
True, that's why I said it was a win win for Nordstrom when this shit started.
#3156 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 482 weeks ago
That's funny, but that equally applies to the hundred liberal groups that pop up yelling about nonsense. I'm not worried about losing the Bernie crowd at Wal-Mart either.
#3157 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 482 weeks ago
Anybody catch his press conference? Even clips of it? What a disaster.
I'm sure Trump fans will celebrate it though.
I listened to a lot of it in the cab on the way to the airport. A lot of it was cringeworthy. It's certainly irregular, and some of his comments were stupid as always, especially his electoral vote shit. But I liked what he said about Flynn. His obsession with ratings as if they have any importance needs to end.
#3158 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 482 weeks ago
Randall Flagg wrote:mitchejw wrote:http://fox2now.com/2017/02/13/gallup-po … t-new-low/
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls … -5493.html
It would be awesome if you could do your own research....
Check it out guys...Rasmussen poll is consistently the nicest to Trump and always his highest approval rating.
There's a reason why RF always resorts to it. And not even the most up to date poll number either. He always cites the most positive number from weeks ago.
What did I type? Read it for once. Think. Then apologize. 55% among who? What is your poll comparing.
Thanks for playing Mitch
Is this a riddle....or....er...
55% usually equates to 55 out of 100...
55% of fly over country?
My poll compares number of respondents who choose one answer choice or another...
I have a serious business proposition for you assuming you have a tolerable voice. You'll read news articles I send you, and provide commentary on them based on the information within.
We'll have 300k subscribers on YouTube in a month. You remind me very much of Wedjat from SLC's place. Are you her reborn as a man?
#3159 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 482 weeks ago
Randall Flagg wrote:mitchejw wrote:Even Fox news has approval at somewhere in the mid 40s...and you have to believe they tilt conservative...
keep quoting that POS Rasmussen report
Once again, Mitch proving he lacks basic reading comprehension.
http://fox2now.com/2017/02/13/gallup-po … t-new-low/
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls … -5493.html
It would be awesome if you could do your own research....
Check it out guys...Rasmussen poll is consistently the nicest to Trump and always his highest approval rating.
There's a reason why RF always resorts to it. And not even the most up to date poll number either. He always cites the most positive number from weeks ago.
What did I type? Read it for once. Think. Then apologize. 55% among who? What is your poll comparing.
Thanks for playing Mitch
#3160 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 482 weeks ago
Randall Flagg wrote:http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_co … rack_feb16
55% approval among likely voters.
Even Fox news has approval at somewhere in the mid 40s...and you have to believe they tilt conservative...
keep quoting that POS Rasmussen report
Once again, Mitch proving he lacks basic reading comprehension.
