It has nothing to do with their wage and the fact something like 70%+ of illegal immigrants are reliant on welfare via their anchor baby.  They don't speak english, so their kids fucks up the class room for everyone else because the school has to hire an interpreter.  They're not paying payroll taxes and often live in large family settings, paying a lesser amount of property taxes, essentially getting a free education on citizens backs.  We don't owe non US Citizens the time of day, let alone an american standard of living.   

I could give two fucks about the color of their skin or what food they prefer.  I care that they adhere to our laws, contribute and adapt to our culture.  The DNC has removed speaking English as a requirement to amnesty/citizenship in their 2016 platform.  They're not doing what's in the best interest of America, but what is in the best interest of their party getting and keeping power.  Bring in all the immigrants you want so long as they're able to get work immediately and contribute to being an American.  I have no interests in bringing in poor foreigners who aren't interested in becoming American, only living under the comfort America provides.

And you don't think that's true of republicans in NY or CA?  The rules are based on the EC, so the candidates campaigned based on the EC.  If the popular vote was how they handled the election, both Trump and Clinton would have campaigned differently.  And yes ID, admitting millions of Hispanics and giving citizenship to their children is how California went from Reagan to solid blue.  Or are we supposed to be ok with the left desiring millions of unskilled laborers dropping off babies so they can't be deported.

That's horse shit. The EC had nothing to do with slavery. Another bullshit lie with no basis in fact. The EC was all about protecting low population states from the tyranny of the majority. Read the fucking federalist papers. Point in case, calling something racist because you lack the knowledge and ability to argue your point.

Get used to it because you're never going to get 38 states to pass an amendment changing it. California shouldn't dictate the election.

You misunderstand my comment on silence. Members of this forum will suffer a stroke if someone with an (R) next to their name does  something. But remain completely silent when that behavior is done with a (D). Point in case people calling Bush a war criminal and demanding he be tried for war crimes. Hundreds of posts on the topic. But not a single post on Obama's use of drones or assasinating an American citizen.

When their silence is brought up to question their conviction or whether or not it's just being a partisan shrill, their argument is "you can't define my silence."  So when 93% of blacks are killed by other blacks, yet someone only comments when the media feeds some bullshit story of a blood thirsty cop out to kill him a negro, I think it's perfectly acceptable to point out the hypocrisy and lack of real conviction.

Or when someone celebrated Wikileaks and Manning, or shared the Romney video, but feigns outrage that the truth was revealed by Wikileaks, I have to call their motives suspect.  Especially when weeks ago the President denied any involvement or influence from a foreign power and Clinton derides Trump for not agreeing to accept the results and calling the election fixed, then after they lose turn a 180 and do everything they criticized Trump for.

No, I think the GOP leadership joined Democrats in calling for an immediate hearing on the claims, and the CIA declined.  People are asking the Electorals vote anyone but Trump because of this claim, and the CIA won't provide any information to Congress before the EC votes?  If they have information that Trump worked with Putin to impact the election, that is treason and the American people should be made aware of that immediately.  If all they're going to say is what we already know, Putin was pissed that Clinton tried to influence his election so he returned the favor by only releasing DNC emails, that's not quite the same now is it?

I said when Comey released that letter a week before the election that it had to be something major, because I found it unfathomable he would do that with nothing new to provide.  I said that on this forum and have since stated he should resign for that stunt.  How much it impacted the election is impossible to say, but there is no denying it did.  We have the same thing here now with the CIA.  If they have something, brief Congressional leadership and the President behind closed doors if it's that sensitive.  But if our two major intelligence agencies are going to start playing politics to upset the American people, that's a hell of a lot bigger problem than if Russia leaked FACTUAL and ACCURATE emails from the DNC.