You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#531 Re: Guns N' Roses » 2011-12 Guns n Roses Tour » 762 weeks ago
anyone going to the MN show?
#532 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
g'night all
#533 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
nothing new though
it has become his ritual that he starts tours out of practice and out of shape
#534 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
Is he on now, like good singing or is he out of tune and out of breath. Guess we will see. And of course it's like Baz says, the dude has to build up his stamina or what else but it doesn't let him off the hook at RIR.
are you going to ground him?
the clips we've gotten so far, although short, are enough to indicate that he has more than begun to correct the problem IMO
still room for improvement but a huge step in the right direction in just one show
#535 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
with vocals?
#536 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
war wrote:Bono wrote:he was by far better in 2010. At least from the shows I saw.
2006
Hammerstien - good vocals
Calgary - terrible vocals
Edmonton - terrible vocals2010
Calgary - amazing vocalsway to base it on one show
have u seen boots/youtube vids?
Are you fucking shitting me? I CLEARLY stated I based me opinion on "from the shows I saw" And yes from the boots I also saw I'd say 2010 was WAY better. I wasn't even going to see them in 2010 untill I saw the boots of how good his voice was.
Did you see them live in person in 2006 and 2010? What's wrong with basing my opinion on specific shows I saw in the same venue? NOTHING. Unreal.
down boy, down
u like to argue, dont you?
anyways....
you saw one show in 2010 and
you said your opinion was based on shows (not boots)
................................
all from your testimony
axlin and i were talking in depth about 06 vs 2010 vocals
not something you can base on only one show from either year
which is what you had done up to that point
i saw them in '06 and they havent come to my neck of the woods since
his voice was great in 2006 but, based on boots, i prefer 2010 cause it is raspier and more consistent IMO
#537 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
war wrote:Axlin08 wrote:Yes he does. Axl has a backing track on just about all of the CD songs.
It was especially noticeable at the Rio show when Axl would drop out. I could swear there was a backing track on This I Love when Axl dropped out that kept playing.
on til
he missed the first line of the second verse and there was nothing so no
He's ALWAYS had one on CD and Shackler's no question. I never notice dit ever on TIL
vocally, those songs are doubled in octaves live and in studio
#538 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
i think he was more consistent in 2010 as well
#539 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
lol
plus i am quite sure he can sing on request in his natural baritone range without warm up
#540 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Spaghetti Incident » 762 weeks ago
best tracks:
down on the farm
aint it fun
since i dont have you
black leather
hair of the dog
