You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#5461 Re: The Garden » Palin flunks mock debates » 919 weeks ago

Wow, CBS actually did her a favor. They cut off the "You know as a mayor, as a governor, as a VP if I were so privileged we would be in a position of changing those things but in supporting the law of the land as it reads today...." on the TV broadcast.


That statement doesn't make any sense!! I swear she just says words to fill in the time.

#5462 Re: The Garden » Palin flunks mock debates » 919 weeks ago

The Couric interview just keeps getting worse. She asks her & Biden seperately what Supreme Court decision they disagree with aside from Roe v Wade, Biden gives his answer, Palin says "Well, hmmmm, in the history of the country, I'm sure many of them. We'll never have a court where we all can agree with every court decision. But hmmm, Roe v Wade for example. I disagree with some of the principals of it..."


Tomorrow is the part where she asks what is the worst thing Dick Cheney ever did, Palin is reported to have answered "When he shot somebody while hunting"  Tomorrow nights gonna be awesome!!

#5463 Re: The Garden » Record plunge for the Dow » 919 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:

Oh and a highlight of this election season was during the debate when Lehrer asked Obama what he was going to cut, and Obama's answer had no mentions of any cuts but he mentioned an extra 25 billion in spending.

Neither answered that question, and I found that annoying, and both missed an opportunity to be straightforward. I mentioned that in the debate thread too. Obama should just come out & say his healthcare plan is on the backburner & in planning mode for the first two years, at least.


Anyway, I have a feeling this country is going to go into a BADDD recession for the next 12-18 months. 2009 is going to be a terrible year eeconomically & I bet alot of layoffs will occur between now & the end of the calendar year as companies forecast & prepare.

#5464 Re: The Garden » Palin flunks mock debates » 919 weeks ago

Axlin08 wrote:

They disowned Zel Miller & Liberman when they become pro-Iraq and pro-Bush.

Not entirely true. Lieberman LOST the 2006 Democratic primary for Connecticut to a relative newcomer. He raised a stink, filed an appeal etc etc. Basically was a weasel & sore loser. People in the Democratic party stood firm & felt he should acknowledge he lost. He eventually ran as an independent and gained enough Democratic & Republican votes in a 3 way race to win in the November Primary. Being bitter, and feeling the party alienated him & did not show support, he slowly drifted over more & more to the Republican side. Bi-Partisan?? or sore loser.


Anyway, RF as for a "Republican being bi-partisan" by showing at the Democratic convention... I didn't even know there was one, so much for that arguement. I guess Republicans made a bigger stink about it than Democrats.

#5465 Re: The Garden » Obama: Time for some facts » 919 weeks ago

Don't bother. It's well known Obama has been on the campaign trail for a year now, probably has missed alot of votes in that time period. However, here is how the voting went down on those bills, was his vote really needed, or did he know these would pass:

Yes   No
60 -33
79 -12
70 -22
79 -14
81 -16
91  -3
93 -10
92 -3

#5466 Re: The Garden » Record plunge for the Dow » 919 weeks ago

Randall Flagg wrote:

You lecture me on partisanship, and then post 500 words on how McCain and Republicans are to blame.

As I said, I wasn't so much trying to make a case 'For Obama' but was simply using your one-way biased tactics to make a point. Note how I also said "The whole system is fucked. Republicans fared no better than Dems in this." which makes the two on equal footing AND "Sure Obama & Dems fucked us also on many bills".


As for me, while I favored Obama over Clinton for a few reasons, I would not go so far as to say he's my favorite choice. If you asked me a year ago I would have sworn Al Gore would step in & win. I'm also & have been a big fan of Biden for some time (a couple years ago said to others why he never ran for President, I later found out he did). Ideally I think a Biden or Gore  with Michael Bloomberg ticket would be the best of all worlds. Experience, leadership, executive experience, foreign policy experience, economic knowledge.

As for Ron Paul, I'm gonna tell you why I never bought into him. He wants to do away with the income tax & implement a National Sales Tax. Well, most people who make under about $60K spend pretty much most of their money. Therefore they would in essence be taxed at 100%. Whereas people who make over say $300K, especially those making in the millions, spend relatively little, so they may only be taxed at 25% of their income, ince they might only spend less than $100K in a year. Therefore, the working class would be taxed on 100% of their salary, whereas the wealthy would be taxed at maybe as little as 10% of their salary or less. Sound to me like someone's not carrying their fair share of the load. Also, his whole plan to do away with IRS & it's programs is a backhanded way of doing away with gov't programs like welfare. Sounds great in theory, then there's reality.

#5467 Re: The Garden » Record plunge for the Dow » 919 weeks ago

Randall Flagg wrote:

This is good.  America needs this to happen to show that liberal economic and social programs destroy an economy.  This isn't proof of the free market collapsing, its proof that government medling in the market and forcing companies to give money to poor families with no collateral is poor fiscal policy.  This is going to send a much needed jolt to people to wake the fuck up and start living within their means.  It's going to teach people that they alone are responsible for their welfare and can't delude themselves into thinking the government will be there when it comes time to pay the piper.

The Republicans are right on this.  Even if their reason for doing it is political posturing, the outcome is still correct.  We need to ride this out and let the market correct itself and kick the government yoke.  Adding more fuel to the fire that was created by government intervention isn't going to help us.

Randall Flagg wrote:

This has nothing to do with the free market.  How can you call this evidence the free market failed when the whole reason it went under is because of regulations the government imposed on it.  These lenders would not have given money to a lot of people if federal law didn't require them too. 

This wasn't the free market at work here.  This was a market with its hands tied behind its back being told that it had to assume risks with a portion of the population because it made leftist feel good about themselves to force banks to loan money to poor minorities.

The answer here is to remove all regulation and force businesses and banks to compete which will lower costs. People buying homes they can't afford or thinking they could make a quick buck on credit are tied into this as well.  Ultimately this comes down to people buying shit they shouldn't have and the democrats saying go ahead and buy it anyway because you should have the best quality of life you can imagine.

Now with Obama coming into office, it's only going to get worse.  We're going to have a President and Congress with no fiscal sense who are going to increase our national debt and continue these warped market policies to provide people with homes and items they can't afford on their own. 
Just look at the Soviet Union to see my point.  Their economy collapsed because they government tried to control it and didn't let the market work itself out.  Greed is a the driver behing an economy.  Greed is good.  The whole Reagan generation has this sense of entitlement that is a complete 180 from the WW2 era.  People think everything should be provided for them rather than having to work for it.  We're a society of instant gratification that only sees why lies in front of us. 

This is an epidemic that stems far from consumerism alone.  A perfect example is animal right morons who bitch and moan about cattle farms and "cruelty" to animals while they goto wal-mart and buy their nice, clean steak wraped in plastic.  They don't connect the dots.

Every "socialist" European nation has instituted free-market changes over the past 15 years and seen an increase in their economy.  American liberals (and dipshit soccer moms/nascar fans) fail to look at history and the world around them and acknowledge that "Hey, maybe it's a bad idea to use the same principles that got us into this mess to get us out of it."

Randall give it up. Check your partisan bias at the door in this thread of all threads. Like John McCain "economy" is not your strong suit. At least James remains mostly impartial and blames Repubs & Dems, Clinton and Bush, you're one way blame game is getting tired.

The whole system is fucked. Republicans fared no better than Dems in this. Are you aware John McCains senior economic advisor is Phil Gramm, author of the Gramm Leach Biley Act, which DEREGULATED the banking industry in 2001?? And it goes without saying that McCain voted 'Yes' on the bill. And if is so blatantly obvious the dems ruined the economy why didn't the Republicans make the neccisary changes from 2001-2007 while they had a Reupblican President AND a majority in the Senate?!  Sure Obama & Dems fucked us also on many bills, but it's not the time to say "It's the lefts fault" that's fucking weak, and this Iraq War sank us $500 BILLION into the toilet. John McCain voted for it, Barack Obama didn't (I'm not making a case about this, just using Randalls biased logic to prove a point). To quote you, "It's only going to get worse" John McCains going to continue to start wars, with no responsibility or forsight, just more wars, more money spent. You talk about Dems being fiscally irresponsible?? The US balanced the budget under Clinton.

http://www.newslinker.net/news.php?viewStory=919

So you can keep on beleiving your 3 second sound bites, about "fically responsible" and "family values" that you love to hear, and Obama's gonna "raise taxes" & all... and while that's been going on, you can ignore the sight of our nations economy going into turmoil & any of us needed loans for college or a mortgage, or with money invested in the stock market. and are paying 3x's what we paid for gas than in 2000, and costs of eggs, milk & bread (my chicken wings at a local bar on Monday nights just went up from $.25 cents to $.35) getting higher while our paychecks aren't. And when you ask yourself "Why are people suddenly voting for Obama/Biden??" You can think really hard for that answer.

And you keep bringing up welfare & the dirt poor. Do you think people on welfare are buying $800k houses in Vegas or Miami?? Poor people rent Einstein... it's the middle class who buy McMansions & overspend, although I know for a fact mortgage lenders embraced risky loans to cash in at the moment. I spoke with a lender who left her company, she was told years ago to "push" loans onto people, they had quota's to do so to push their quarterly profits that's all corporations look at. Part of it was give them this loan now, with thousands of dollars in closing costs, then in 5 years they refinance, with thousands of dollars in closing costs. Only eventually the housing prices depreciated, so the house was worth much less than what they paid. Why bother refinancing & just not walk away. Do you know most old-money CEO's are Republicans?? Why, the tax breaks they give them. And for every Democratic inner-city welfare recepient that is overspending there's probably some republican, gun-toting Jerry Springer trailer park living recepient with Direct TV saying "Yeehaw I just got me a damn new HDTV at Walmart!!". I'm willing to bet that the poor make up a VERY small percent of our nations GDP. I'd guess less than 5%, the US could take that hit.

We're all fucked, each & every one of us. Sure we get nice little colored pamplets from work about how if we start investing at 22 just 6% of our salary into our 401k by the time we're 55 at 8% interest we'll be a millionaire.. It's all bullshit!!  The market won't yield an 8% return EVERY year for 30-40 years, it will go up, then down, then up. Yesterday the Dow closed LOWER than when Bush took office. Almost 8 years later. So, on average, if you put nothing new into your investment, you wouldn't have much more than in 2000. Maybe less!! Most of us don't have pensions anymore, a move which coincided with the gross oversalaries of Republican CEO's (Hello Carly Fiorino) Where do you think working class' pension money went to??, by the time we reach 65 Social Security will be all dried up from the baby boomers, so we'll have like $100,000 of 401k money if we're lucky to retire on.


We're fucked.

#5469 Re: The Garden » White House says No More Bailouts » 919 weeks ago

I don't know EXACTLY what this chart indicates, but the fact that it's on CIA.gov makes me believe it's legit. I think we operate on borrowed money, and are fast becoming just another country economically.


https://www.cia.gov/library/publication … 7rank.html

#5470 Re: The Garden » 2008 NFL season » 919 weeks ago

Yeah, Buff & Tenn have had great starts. Buff looks like they have a future in their QB, Tenn is doing great with a journeyman in Kerry Collins (can't believe he's still in the league but he's doing well). Buffalo getting some home field would be huge in January.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB