You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#551 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
NICE
#552 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
war wrote:i agree with most of that but i prefer 2010.
the tiebreaker for me was i feel he had more tone to his voice in 2010 - a little flat at times in 2006
Yeah but I think there are times on the rockers in 2010 he puts more pressure on his vocals, and frankly sounds like he's taking a shit while singing.
I gotta be honest, I really cannot stand the 2009-11 performances of CD-the song.
Really REALLY liked the 2006 performances better. More rasp than 2002, less "cat in heat" than 2010.
you are entitled to your opinion
#553 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
i agree with most of that but i prefer 2010.
the tiebreaker for me was i feel he had more tone to his voice in 2010 - a little flat at times in 2006
#554 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
axlin - u think he was better in 06 or 2009/10?
#555 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
way different
#556 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
Hopefully after Rio... that's a good thing.
true
#557 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
gotta be mix.
when peeps are saying they couldnt hear him to know how the vocals were sounding
#558 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
yes i know to youtube
i was hoping to hear somethn tonight
#559 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
y u think that?
when and where are u thinking recordings will be available?
#560 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago
ah - any audio expected/cell phone recordings?

