You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#5671 Re: Guns N' Roses » And Here ... We ... Go. » 911 weeks ago

The truth doesn't give up bigbri.  So far, nothing (and I mean nothing) has happened to prove me wrong.  Where are the number 1 singles?  Do you really think the album is going to sell after the first couple of days based on 2 singles with mixed (at best) reviews?  Shit - you guys don't even know what songs are good and which ones suck.

Anybody that thinks Axl is a good singer go download some boots, then play the albums.  That will put a quick end to that debate.  Again, he didn't rerecord the live era vocals because they were good, did he?  Surely he could have found 25 songs that had good vocals on them with all the material out there, right?  Nothing wrong with admiring someone, but try to open both eyes.

#5672 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses - studio only band? » 911 weeks ago

Look around you...he's not alone.  CD = overrated.  And I'm not just talking about all the bloated expectations, the album is not even produced at an acceptable level for a "band" called Guns N' Roses much less performed at that level.  History will see this album as a joke and a failure.  It's still the butt of all the jokes and it's actually been released...people aren't saying "at least it was worth the wait" - they are still making jokes about the wait.  IF this is Axl Rose's statement to the world, I hope he goes back to being quiet.  Hopefully he just dropped this piece of crap to move onto his real work (whatever that might be).

#5673 Re: Guns N' Roses » And Here ... We ... Go. » 911 weeks ago

First off, I NEVER have said Slash didn't need Axl - quite the opposite as I've ALWAYS said that they needed each other and neither is close to as good as they were on their own as they were together.  Look it up.  End of that story.

You guys really think SCOM and NR are lyrical masterpieces?  Wow is all I can say.  A 10 year old could have written them to his first puppy love (especially SCOM).  Wake up.  Axl is not a fantastic singer (see his live performances as proof), he's not a magical song writer (see HIS whole body of work as proof - do you think he rerecorded some of the vocals for live era because they were good?).  He is a fantastic frontman (entertainer) that can sing very well if given enough takes in the studio and is as well known (likely more well known, but I'll be generous) for the shit he does than ANYTHING he has accomplished musically. 

I loved the old band as much as anybody.  I can look at it objectively enough to call it what it was and enjoy it for what it was.  Axl isn't a great singer but can put together songs very well.  Slash is limited with what he can write as far as song structure goes (which happens to be Axl's strong point) but can fit solos to songs like nobody I have ever heard.  Whoever said Axl can write rockers is nuts - Izzy mostly (and Slash/Duff a little) wrote the rockers.  Axl didn't write them on CD either...thank Huge/BH/Finck for the couple that exist.  You guys are so far lost in denial it is not even funny.

#5674 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR Evo members' Chinese Democracy reviews thread » 912 weeks ago

Axlin08 wrote:

Those Slash fans, those Welcome To The Jungle fans - don't bother. You'll be disappointed. You'll find it blasphemy. But to those Axl fans - you'll be in hog heaven.

What about the Slash fans that love the songs like Estranged and NR that were Axl's babies?  Axl's vision is a pile of shit without someone like Slash to take it to the next level and this album only proves that Axl can't do anything without a Slash or BH type of guitarist to bring the songs and GnR up from being the next sappy ballad playing band. 

Axl is a lot more like Hinder then some of you want to admit...he writes pussy songs that don't rock at all until someone else steps in to make it listenable.  Mock me all you want, but there's a lot of truth to that.

#5676 Re: Guns N' Roses » GN'R/CD Promotion Materials » 912 weeks ago

I thought the display was pathetic.  It was right by the door, but I had to go look for it because it didn't stand out at all.  There were a few CDs missing and the vinal all appeared to still be there.  Certainly none of the sell outs some people were predicting or at least worried about.  I didn't buy a copy...I'm going to wait for the price to come down.  As many as they bought, it may be in the bargain bin before next spring.

#5677 Re: Guns N' Roses » Surprise appearance at the AMA's? » 912 weeks ago

Really?  Finally releasing an album after 14 years, having brutal production value on songs that were finished 4+ years ago, not doing ANYTHING to promote it, and missing 2 of the key guys that wrote the songs doesn't sound a lot like someone that has their shit together to me, but maybe I just have higher standards than you guys do. 

The guy is AWOL (as is the rest of his "band" with very, very minor momentary exceptions) in the weeks before the most hyped album release ever and you guys think everything is ok with Axl?  I hope none of you are psychologists responsible for putting insane criminals back on the street because they seem to be ok.

#5678 Re: Guns N' Roses » Surprise appearance at the AMA's? » 912 weeks ago

In all sincerity, Spears and Axl are both train wrecks at this point.  Neither should be doing it.

#5679 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Slash Confirms RCA Split » 912 weeks ago

I'm glad they released it.  It's my favorite post GnR performance from Slash...it's too bad the mix on it was horrible and you can't hear his work through half of the album.

#5680 Re: Guns N' Roses » And Here ... We ... Go. » 912 weeks ago

I don't like Hinder and you're right - they will likely never make the HoF, but neither will this version of GnR other than Axl and probably Dizzy.  Maybe Tommy makes it for his other work (not likely, but I'm not a Replacements expert) and nobody else has a chance. 

I'd say Hinder has as much credibility to talk about music as Pitman, Dizzy, Frank, and anybody else that is more or less a hanger on to GnR.  Where would most of these guys be without GnR?  Sure you can say the same about Axl and Slash, but at least they contributed to what made GnR successful, not grabbed on after the heyday to make a few dollars (not that there's anything wrong with making money doing what you love).

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB