You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#5791 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 916 weeks ago
The best way to help the band is to actually get people interested, not to make it look like people are interested. Imaginary people don't buy records.
#5792 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 916 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:This isn't grass roots, this is spamming (in my opinion to please a select few). Grass roots would be getting people interested, not faking people's interest.
I just can't imagine why you care about it at all.
No, the problem is that you assume you know something about me when you don't. You've pretty much had it in for me for awhile now and I'm not really sure why. If you have a problem with me, take it to PM, otherwise respect the fact that I have an opinion and I have the right to share it.
Fuck all of you that think I want this album to fail. It's actually quite the opposite, but what I see has failure written all over it. You see that as being negative, I see it as being honest with myself, which more of you should look into. Read what's going on around you, read the not so surreal thread...this isn't as great as you either think it is or want it to be. People are underwhelmed, and these are fans that have been on the forums for years.
I'm staying out of the celebration thread and any other thread specifically for that purpose. I'm responding to the threads that I'm interested in. Nobody asked me to stay out of that thread - I even deleted a post in a thread that I thought brought a bad vibe to a good thread. I'm sympathetic to your cause, but threads like radio's response are fair game for any comments (positive or negative).
#5793 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 916 weeks ago
This isn't grass roots, this is spamming (in my opinion to please a select few). Grass roots would be getting people interested, not faking people's interest.
#5794 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses to release Chinese Democracy single » 916 weeks ago
Buzz, you are being a bit of an ass....you made your point 20 posts ago.
Oh, so I get singled out in this? Would that be the case if I was posting over and over how great it was? I didn't think so.
Too bad. Skip the posts if you don't want to read it. I will respond when spoken to, so politely ask people not to address my opinions...then I can state my opinion once and leave it at that instead of either defending my opinion or defending my right to have an opinion.
#5795 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses to release Chinese Democracy single » 916 weeks ago
Another double standard...the only credible opinion is one that supports the band? Sorry, you're wrong. So wrong that even if you had a point somewhere in that post, it went away with that paragraph.
#5796 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 916 weeks ago
tejastech08 wrote:buzzsaw wrote:Wow, that was quick. I figured it would get full play for a day at least...
What's even funnier is that was the PREMIERE of it on that particular station. They didn't even play the full version of it ONE time.
I'm surprised any radio station bothered with that bit at all to be honest. It's fine as the opening to the album, it works great, but as part of the single it was always going to be cut by the radio. Unless you're somewhere with perfect reception and no background noise the whole chinese talking bit just sounds like dead air. If the track plays in your car you won't hear anything until those drum beats. Makes sense to cut it out imo.
Yet another reason it was a bad choice for a first single...
Bright Eyes, we get it. You want us to make the song appear more popular than it really is.
#5797 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 916 weeks ago
LOL, that 98.9 station played a shortened version of it. It started with the first guitar licks. The whole Chinese people talking part is cut out entirely.
Wow, that was quick. I figured it would get full play for a day at least...
#5798 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 916 weeks ago
bigbri wrote:I'm just going to request my local stations play it because I want to hear it in my car eventually. Sorry, not gonna call and email others. Don't have time.
That's mostly what I'm doing too. I haven't actually heard this song on the radio yet (I've managed to miss it every time WRIF played it so far today) so I'm gonna keep requesting it via phone until I do.
I have no problem with calling your local station and requesting it. It's this crap that Bright Eyes is doing that is bullshit. Flooding stations with e-mails that don't actually reflect what their listeners want is bad for EVERYBODY involved.
#5799 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses to release Chinese Democracy single » 916 weeks ago
russtcb wrote:Oh and I sincerely hope that CD is the opener at all future shows. That would just kick ass.
Because, as I've explained, in my opinion it's a good choice for a first single as well as the first song in a set!
FTFY
#5800 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses to release Chinese Democracy single » 916 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:Congrats! Following up weak with weak and hypocritical isn't an easy thing to do...most people would have let it go at weak.
You state your opinion (your "proof") as though it's fact, then get on me for it? Again, weak. Also hypocritical. There's no point in wasting time on you when you put nothing into it yourself. Come back with something credible and well thought out and I'll consider actually responding, otherwise, consider this discussion over.
Ok, here's how it works. The record label isn't dumb. They're not going to put poor marketing behind a multi-million dollar project and release a single that will turn people off to the album. That's what a single is: A marketing strategy to sell their product- the album. When the album is completed and they're preparing the release, they put together a 'listening panel'. The panel listens to the songs and vote on what they think is best, or what they would like to hear. The panel is made up of different sexes, ethnicities, etc. The idea is to get the opinion of the general public, not just the diehards and internet nerds (us.) This is how they arrive at what gets released as a single. Hence, CD won, and as I have previously stated, it has what a single needs. Later on in this thread you said that what you were saying was all your opinion. I called you out because in your original post, nowhere was there a "in my opinion", or "I think..". No, you said that releasing this as a single was going to make the album tank, that this was the next SBQM. You never stated that was just your opinion, you actually said it very matter of factly.
I'm sorry, where is your "I think" in this entire statement? After all, this is just what you think and not fact at all.
Fortunately for you, I understand when you say something, it is just your opinion where you do not seem to get that about others. You don't need to add "I think" for me to understand that it is just some guy having an opinion. Thank you for proving my point, unless you're implying that you were part of the decision making for the marketing of this album. 
