You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#721 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 365 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:You understand wealth vs cash, right? Losing money on paper is just that. Why do we care what he lost? Wasn't he a Democrat at that point?
You're being willfully obtuse me thinks.
I mean fer chrissake, the news undermines Trump's entire platform for the most part. But MAGA peeps are like....eh, what's the big deal?
Propaganda, tribalism and the cult of personality is getting downright scary with you guys.
Dont think...its not helping you.
#722 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 365 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:PaSnow wrote:OJ Simpson?
Honestly, 1985-1995 wasn't much of a 'Run for the hills the economy isa crashing!!" era, lets not make it out like it was. 91-92 there was a recession, fairly mild one but the timing of it, added with 12 years of Reagan/Bush Presidency it was time for people to choose a new direction. It was not, however, a time where everyone lost everything. Especially the rich.
I may be mistaken but prove me wrong by naming names of those who were wiped out.
You understand wealth vs cash, right? Losing money on paper is just that. Why do we care what he lost? Wasn't he a Democrat at that point?
He’s a douche...whether he’s a rep or dem, he’s a douche
So its news if a douche loses some of his wealth?
#723 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 365 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:mitchejw wrote:Losses of over a billion dollars in a decade....and no one cares.
Why should we? You know how many wealthy people lost a shit ton of (theoretical) money over that time period?
OJ Simpson?
Honestly, 1985-1995 wasn't much of a 'Run for the hills the economy isa crashing!!" era, lets not make it out like it was. 91-92 there was a recession, fairly mild one but the timing of it, added with 12 years of Reagan/Bush Presidency it was time for people to choose a new direction. It was not, however, a time where everyone lost everything. Especially the rich.
I may be mistaken but prove me wrong by naming names of those who were wiped out.
You understand wealth vs cash, right? Losing money on paper is just that. Why do we care what he lost? Wasn't he a Democrat at that point?
#724 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 365 weeks ago
Losses of over a billion dollars in a decade....and no one cares.
Why should we? You know how many wealthy people lost a shit ton of (theoretical) money over that time period?
#725 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 366 weeks ago
Honest question: Does anyone else feel it's occasionally somewhat implied that the russian lawyer who met with Trump & Kush & all might have been a setup? Almost like a sting operation setup by the Feds.
I've gotten that impression once or twice, and can't quite get a grasp on it. If it was, I can't imagine her being much welcomed back in Russia.
If I cared, I'd be more interested in knowing why this matters this time, but not other times politicians have met with Russia. I don't get too excited about the selective outrage generated these days. Politicians meet with people from other countries. Business people meet with people from other countries. What exactly makes this one so special? Because you don't like him you assume something illegal happened? But it's okay when your side did it? If you're going to be pissed, get pissed about all of it, otherwise you get dismissed immediately as prejudiced.
#726 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 366 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:bigbri wrote:Buzz, I'm not quoting your post because it's a page or so back, but I totally agree with most of what you say about healthcare. It's screwed up. I don't have an answer. I do know that I think the cost of health care, drugs, rooms, even getting an education that gets you into the industry is incredibly overpriced and rising at astonishing rates. Why? I wish I knew.
I don't have a suggested plan. Universal healthcare? Sounds good. Who pays? We all do with higher taxes. I don't think dismantling what we have without giving the people who rely on it something else is wise. COBRA is laughingly expensive, and that's what many of my friends have had to do before the ACA.
You clearly have a much more intimate look at this topic with a deeper knowledge. I can only speak to what my dozens of laid off friends and family members have gone through. It's been shitty and as you say probably will remain so.
I think the solution has to start with controlling costs...any meaningful solution at least.
You’re right...i misinterpreted this i guess.
The problem will always be that quality health care is expensive and no one wants to pay for it but everyone wants it.
The private sector produced surgeons who used rusty saws in surgery and doctors who prescribed shots of whiskey.
When was this? Last year? Last week?
If you're not interested in a discussion, just skip it like all the other topics you don't have an answer for. This isn't an easy subject anyway, so you're probably better off sticking to trump is orange posts.
#727 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 366 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:bigbri wrote:Buzz, I'm not quoting your post because it's a page or so back, but I totally agree with most of what you say about healthcare. It's screwed up. I don't have an answer. I do know that I think the cost of health care, drugs, rooms, even getting an education that gets you into the industry is incredibly overpriced and rising at astonishing rates. Why? I wish I knew.
I don't have a suggested plan. Universal healthcare? Sounds good. Who pays? We all do with higher taxes. I don't think dismantling what we have without giving the people who rely on it something else is wise. COBRA is laughingly expensive, and that's what many of my friends have had to do before the ACA.
You clearly have a much more intimate look at this topic with a deeper knowledge. I can only speak to what my dozens of laid off friends and family members have gone through. It's been shitty and as you say probably will remain so.
I do know a lot about it, but I don't know everything, and admittedly I have my biases because I see things from a point of view that may not be a popular point of view. Here's what I do know...the government can't do anything efficiently. Ask a veteran about their VA experiences for example. I don't trust them to be able to effectively run healthcare. I know some disagree with that, but I've seen nothing that even hints they can do it.
How can you say this and call for price fixing? That is the definition of government getting involved.
Quite frankly I’m tired of this argument because it is so poorly thought out. OK government has a history of not running things very well, why does that imply or even serve as proof that the private sector is doing a good job? All the private sector serves to do is to accumulate more and more wealth in certain pockets of the country. Most of us continue to fall further and further behind. The goal is not to make sure we’re all fed and healthy and happy, the goal is to squeeze us until we submit. Until we submit into indentured servitude. Until were all willing to work for the absolute bare minimum.
So yeah, when someone tells me the government isn’t running things right, then I look at the private sector and its like well it ain’t too great over here either.
Well since I didn't call for price fixing, I'm going to skip the rest of your post as I'm sure it reflects an equal lack of reading comprehension.
#728 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 366 weeks ago
The sky isn't falling until you open your other eye.
#729 Re: The Sunset Strip » HBO's A Game of Thrones » 366 weeks ago
I've learned over the years to enjoy things for what they are instead of picking them apart piece by piece. It's good entertainment if you don't overanalyze it.
#730 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 366 weeks ago
In general, we have a government philosophy and zeitgeist of the past 35 years that has been all about tiny government, pour money into the private sector.
We apparently keep choosing this until shit hits the fan and then we get an Obama type. Obama rose to political power because the Conservative way of running our economy blew up again.
Republicans = loyal to the extremely rich and corporations
Democrats = that, but liteThat's the way 'we', the public keep wanting it. We vote for these people repeatedly. This is no one's fault but our own.
So you understand all of this, yet you take the positions you take instead of trying to be part of the solution. Until people figure out neither party right now is interested in making your life better, we're fucked. All of us.
