Answer me this then KV, Alan Nven got Peter Paterno to draw up a partnership agreement which Axl refused to sign so it sat in a draw. Axl then sacked Niven and post that event took control of the name.

How ethical do you think that was even if not illegal? Why would he not sign it other than the fact he wanted to fuck the other guys over?

Also what was the statute of limitations on them launching a claim for this shit too? Honest question, was it passed before they realized what had happened?

Just because something can't be proved in court to their burden of proof doesn't mean it didn't or some version of it never happened.

Re getting released from the lable, just had a thought maybe Axl wants this to occur before he would ever consider a reunion. I don't see a reunion happening although Axls cryptic letter did kinda leave the door somewhat ajar.

Anyhow my point is not about whether it will or won't happen, but rather hypothetically if it was going to wouldn't it make sense to be out of his contract before even going down this path. He then has the whip hand and is free to choose who they get into bed with etc. more importantly I'm sure they would be able to make much more money as they could negotiate a much better deal.

Oh good he gave us his email address so we can tell him what a TWAT he is.

I heard him mention the words hip hop and I fell asleep.